No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
In this paper I would like to consider Hell as a concept around which there cluster various different difficulties, and to see how and on what conditions some of these difficulties could be overcome, the whole paper illustrating, albeit by reference to a particular topic, and so with obvious restrictions, the character of theological argument, the nature of theological assertions, and the kind of empirical grounding that must be given to them.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1968
References
page 209 note 1 C. G. A. Harnack, History of Dogma (trans. J. Millar), 3rd ed., vol. 5, p. 114.
page 209 note 2 De Vera Religione, xl, 76, quoted in Hick, Evil and the God of Love (London, 1966), p. 89Google Scholar.
page 213 note 1 Evil and the God of Love, p. 184.
page 213 note 2 Downey, Richard, ‘Divine Providence’, in The Teaching of the Catholic Church (ed. Smith, G. D.) (rev. ed. London, 1952)Google Scholar, vol. i, ch. vii, p. 245.
page 214 note 1 Evil and the God of Love, p. 118.
page 215 note 1 Joumet, Charles, The Meaning of Evil (London, 1963), pp. 168-9Google Scholar.
page 216 note 1 Evil and the God of Love, p. 98.
page 217 note 1 Ibid., pp. 183, 184.
page 217 note 2 Ibid., p. 98.
page 218 note 1 See, e.g., Ramsey, I., Religious Language (London, 1957)Google Scholar, ch. ii.