No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
Wittgenstein was unreliable as an historian of philosophy. When he criticised other philosophers he rarely gave chapter and verse for his criticism, and on the rare occasions on which he quoted verbatim he did not always do justice to the authors quoted. I will illustrate this first in the comparatively unimportant case of Augustine and then in the more serious case of Frege.
page 2 note 1 Confessions, 1, 8Google Scholar: cum gemitibus et vocibus variis et variis membrorum motibus, edere vellem sensa cordis mei, ut voluntati paretur.
page 2 note 2 Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. Geach, Peter and Black, Max (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960)Google Scholar (hereafter GB), p. 63.Google Scholar