No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
In approaching the topic, ‘Objectivity and Cultural Divergence’, there is little doubt that certain styles of philosophizing will conceive of the task confronting them as that of devising or at least calling attention to standards of rationality by which distinctions between objectivity and divergence are to be drawn. This mode of philosophizing is marked by the confidence it has in its own methods. It seldom occurs to it to question its own operations; to ask whether the heterogeneity of our culture does not itself create difficulties for the practice of philosophy. It is to such questionings as these, however, that I want to direct attention in this lecture.
1 Malcolm, Norman, ‘The Groundlessness of Belief’, Thought and Knowledge (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), 204.Google Scholar
2 Nielsen, Kai, ‘On the Rationality of Groundless Believing’, Idealistic Studies XI, No. 3 (09 1981), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Tylor, E. B., Primitive Culture (London: John Murray, 1920), 453.Google Scholar
4 O'Connor, Flannery, Mystery and Manners, selected and edited by Sally, and Fitzgerald, Robert (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1969), 159.Google Scholar
5 Freud, Sigmund, The Future of an Illusion (London: Hogarth Press, 1962), 46.Google Scholar
6 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, ‘Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough’, The Human World No. 3 (05 1971).Google Scholar
7 Coles, Robert, Flannery O'Connor's South (Louisiana State University Press, 1980), 6–7.Google Scholar
8 Ibid. 10–11.
9 Op. cit. 168.
10 Ibid. 189.
11 O'Connor, Flannery, ‘The Lame Shall Enter First’ in Everything That Rises Must Converge (London: Faber, 1965), 161.Google Scholar
12 Ibid. 189–190.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid. 187.
15 Op.cit. 429.
16 Phillips, D. Z., Religion Without Explanation (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1976), 40–41.Google Scholar
17 Wittgenstein, , ‘Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough’, The Human World No. 3 (05 1971), 34.Google Scholar
18 Letters of Flannery O'Connor: The Habit of Being, selected and edited by Fitzgerald, Sally (New York, Vintage Books, 1980) 147.Google Scholar
19 Mystery and Manners, 193.Google Scholar
20 Ibid. 31.
21 For a discussion of these issues see my paper ‘Mystery and Mediation’, in Images in Belief and Literature, David Jasper (ed.) (London: Macmillan, forthcoming).
22 Mystery and Manners, 30–31.Google Scholar
23 The Habit of Being, 100.Google Scholar
24 Ibid. 456.
25 Whether this could be said with the same conviction now is another matter.
26 Mystery and Manners, 166.Google Scholar
27 For a discussion of some of these issues see my, ‘Alienation and the Sociologizing of Meaning’ (symposium with A. R. Manser), Proc. Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Volume LIII (1979).Google Scholar
28 Mystery and Manners, 33–34.Google Scholar
29 Quoted in, Coles, Robert, Flannery O'Connor's South, 154.Google Scholar
30 Mystery and Manners, 113.Google Scholar
31 Didion, Joan, The White Album (London, Penguin Books, 1981), 41–42.Google Scholar
32 Quoted in Coles, Robert, Flannery O'Connor's South xxviii.Google Scholar
33 The Habit of Being, 437.Google Scholar
34 Mystery and Manners, 97–98.Google Scholar
35 Ibid. 41–42.
36 The Habit of Being, 389.Google Scholar
37 O'Connor, Flannery, ‘A Good Man is Hard to Find’ in her collection of the same title (London, Faber, 1968), 29.Google Scholar
38 Mystery and Manners, 111–112.Google Scholar
39 The Habit of Being, 389–390.Google Scholar
40 Mystery and Manners, 113.Google Scholar
41 Ibid. 91.
42 Ibid. 180.
43 Wittgenstein, , Zettel, Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965), 455.Google Scholar
44 Mystery and Manners, 57.Google Scholar
45 The Habit of Being, 457.Google Scholar
46 Ibid. 147.
47 Mystery and Manners, 118.Google Scholar