Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T07:53:20.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Imaginative Cognition1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

Deena Skolnick Weisberg
Deena Skolnick Weisberg*
Affiliation:
The University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last ten years or so, many cognitive scientists have begun to work on topics traditionally associated with philosophical aesthetics, such as issues about the objectivity of aesthetic judgments and the nature of aesthetic experience. An increasingly interdisciplinary turn within philosophy has started to take advantage of these connections, to the benefit of all. But one area that has been somewhat overlooked in this new dialogue is developmental psychology, which treats questions about whether and to what extent children's intuitions about various aspects of aesthetic experience match those of adults, as well as the origins and developmental trajectories of these intuitions. The current paper reviews some recent work in developmental psychology that has the potential to inform philosophical research on a variety of topics – not necessarily because of this work tells us directly about what children think, but because learning what children's aesthetic intuitions are and how they develop can help us to better understand why adults have the intuitions that they do.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 75: Philosophical Aesthetics and the Sciences of Art , October 2014 , pp. 85 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The author would like to thank the organizers and attendees of the 2012 AHRC workshop on “Method in Philosophical Aesthetics: The Challenge from the Sciences” for their insightful comments and questions. Thanks also to Paul Bloom, Joshua Goodstein, Alison Gopnik, Alan Leslie, David Sobel, Lu Wang, and Michael Weisberg for their support of the projects reported in this paper.

References

2 L. Guillot & P. Bloom ‘Are children interested in negative stories?’ Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society (2011).

3 This is known as the “single code theory.” See Bosco, F. M., Friedman, O., & Leslie, A. M., ‘Recognition of pretend and real actions in play by 1- and 2-year-olds: Early success and why they fail,’ Cognitive Development, 21 (2006), 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gendler, T. S. & Kovakovich, K., ‘Genuine rational fictional emotions,’ in Kieran, M. (Ed.), Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar; Nichols, S., ‘Imagining and believing: The promise of a single code,’ The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62 (2004), 129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Leslie, A. M., ‘Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind,”’ Psychological Review, 94 (1987), 412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P., Mindreading: An integrated account of pretense, self-awareness, and understanding other minds (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D., ‘A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets,’ Psychological Review, 111 (2004), 3–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Lewis, D., ‘Causation,’ Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), 556–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weisberg, D. S. & Gopnik, A., ‘Pretense, counterfactuals, and Bayesian causal models: Why what is not real really matters,’ Cognitive Science, 37 (2013), 1368–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See Piaget, J., Play, dreams and imitation in childhood (New York: Norton, 1962)Google Scholar.

7 For example, Bourchier, A. & Davis, A., ‘Children's understanding of the pretence-reality distinction: A review of current theory and evidence,’ Developmental Science, 5 (2002), 397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Golomb, C. & Kuersten, R., ‘On the transition from pretense play to reality: What are the rules of the game?’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14 (1996), 203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Samuels, A. & Taylor, M., ‘Children's ability to distinguish fantasy events from real-life events,’ British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12 (1994), 417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woolley, J. D. & Cox, V., ‘Development of beliefs about storybook reality.’ Developmental Science, 10 (2007), 681–693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. For review, see Weisberg, D. S., ‘Distinguishing imagination from reality’ in Taylor, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

8 Woolley, J. D. & Wellman, H. M., ‘Young children's understanding of realities, nonrealities, and appearances’ Child Development, 61 (1990), 946–961CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

9 Study 1 of Wyman, E., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M., ‘Normativity and context in young children's pretend play,’ Cognitive Development, 24 (2009), 146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Leslie, A. M., ‘15-month-old infants detect violations in pretend scenarios,’ Acta Psychologica, 124 (2007), 106–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; D. S. Weisberg, L. Wang, & A. M. Leslie, ‘How do young children conceptualize socially constructed pretend scenarios?’ (under review).

11 Skolnick, D. & Bloom, P., ‘What does Batman think about SpongeBob? Children's understanding of the fantasy/fantasy distinction,’ Cognition, 101 (2006), B9–B18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

12 Harris, P. L. & Kavanaugh, R. D., ‘Young children's understanding of pretense,’ Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; D. S. Weisberg, L. Wang, & A. M. Leslie, ‘How do young children conceptualize socially constructed pretend scenarios?’ op. cit.; E. Wyman, H. Rakoczy, & M. Tomasello, ‘Normativity and context in young children's pretend play,’ op. cit.

13 Study 1 of Weisberg, D. S. & Bloom, P., ‘Young children separate multiple pretend worlds,’ Developmental Science, 12 (2009), 699–705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

14 For example, Currie, G., The nature of fiction (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lewis, D., ‘Truth in fiction,’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 15 (1978), 37–46Google Scholar; Walton, K. L., Mimesis as make-believe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

15 Ryan, M., ‘Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure,’ Poetics, 9 (1980), 403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 For example, Gerrig, R. J., Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Marsh, E. J., Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., ‘Learning facts from fiction,’ Journal of Memory and Language, 49 (2003), 519–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., & Bailis, D. S., ‘What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts,’ Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4 (1997), 416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Weisberg, D. S. & Goodstein, J., ‘What belongs in a fictional world?’ Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9 (2009), 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 I am grateful to Gregory Currie for his insightful discussion of these issues.

19 Weisberg, D. S., Sobel, D. M., Goodstein, J. & Bloom, P., ‘Young children are reality-prone when thinking about stories,’ Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13 (2013), 383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Sobel, D. M. & Weisberg, D. S., ‘Tell me a story: How children's developing domain knowledge affects their story construction,’ Journal of Cognition and Development (in press)Google Scholar.

21 See Gendler, T. S., ‘The puzzle of imaginative resistance,’ Journal of Philosophy, 97 (2000), 285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T. S. Gender, ‘Imaginative resistance revisited’ and Weinberg, J. & Meskin, A., ‘Puzzling over the imagination: Philosophical problems, architectural solutions,’ in Nichols, S. (ed.), The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretense, possibility and fiction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

22 D. S. Weisberg & J. Goodstein, ‘What belongs in a fictional world?’ op. cit.

23 Brédart, S., Ward, T. B. & Marczewski, P., ‘Structured imagination of novel creatures’ faces,’ American Journal of Psychology, 111 (1998), 607–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, T. B., ‘Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation,’ Cognitive Psychology, 27 (1994), 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, T. B. & Sifonis, C. M., ‘Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same?’ Journal of Creative Behavior, 31 (1997), 245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 T. B. Ward, ‘Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation,’ op. cit.

25 Shtulman, A., ‘The development of possibility judgment within and across domains,’ Cognitive Development, 24 (2009), 293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shtulman, A. & Carey, S., ‘Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events,’ Child Development, 78 (2007), 1015–1032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

26 Weisberg, D. S. & Sobel, D. M., ‘Young children discriminate improbable from impossible events in fiction,’ Cognitive Development, 27 (2012), 90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 See D. S. Weisberg & A. Gopnik, ‘Pretense, counterfactuals, and Bayesian causal models: Why what is not real really matters,’ op. cit.

28 For example, Byrne, R. M. J., The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Gopnik, A., The philosophical baby: What children's minds tell us about truth, love, and the meaning of life (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2009)Google Scholar; Hoerl, C., McCormack, T. & Beck, S. R., Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Seligman, M., Railton, P., Baumeister, R., & Sripada, C., ‘Navigating into the future or driven by the past,’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (2013), 119–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Weisberg, D. S., ‘The vital importance of imagination’ in Brockman, M. (ed.), What's next? Dispatches on the future of science (New York: Vintage Books, 2009)Google Scholar.