Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:34:18.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Conversation between the Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

I choose this somewhat awkward title because it seems to me to be necessary to insist on the uncertainty, the lack of structure, in the connection between the generations. This is due to a large extent of course to the multiple character of the expression ‘generation’ itself; it is a word with such a tangle of related and overlapping meanings attached to it that it is surprising to find that it goes on being used without qualificatory adjectives. Let us look at a few of the notions which ‘generation’ covers.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 175 note 1 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, 1st ed. (London, 1790) pp. 143–4. Burke's easy assumption of ethical continuity between even distant generations may be compared with Hooker's statement that ‘the act of a public society five hundred years sithence standeth as theirs which are presently of the same society’. Both thinkers betray the unhistorical attitude characteristic of contractarian political thinking, and both are also assuming a metaphysical, revelationary principle of continuity over time no longer at the disposal of late twentieth-century social and political inquiry. See below.Google Scholar

page 184 note 1 For the generational depth of the pre-industrial domestic group, see Laslett, , ‘Size and Structure of the Household in England over Three Centuries’, Population Studies (07 1969)Google Scholar, and for an attempt to appreciate the implications of the change from this norm of familial relations over time, see Laslett, , The World we have lost, 2nd ed. (1970)Google Scholar. References are supplied in that volume to the historical demographic research supporting the conclusions cited above; see especially Wrigley, E. A., Population and History (1969).Google Scholar

page 185 note 1 Indeed it appears to have been doubtful whether a parent was legally obliged to support his children, which is a further incoherence of behaviour from the point of view of the present thesis. The attitude seems to have been, however, that no legal sanction was either necessary or likely to be effective in a situation where to offer nurture was a spontaneous and entirely ‘natural’ matter. The same curious reasoning is found in those lawyers of earlier times who justified the right of fathers to punish their children with death, on the grounds that men love their offspring so dearly that they could be relied upon never to exercise such a right unnecessarily or unjustly.