Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T11:36:29.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Art and Technology: An Old Tension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Anthony O'Hear
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is not the first time the title ‘Art and Technology’ has been used, but to distinguish what I have to say from Walter Gropius's Bauhaus exhibition of 1923, I am subtitling my paper ‘an old tension’, where the architect spoke of ‘a new unity’. In a way, Gropius has been proved right; the structures of the future avoiding all romantic embellishment and whimsy, the cathedrals of socialism, the corporate planning of comprehensive Utopian designs have all gone up and some come down. We have a mass media culture also largely made possible by technology. Corporatist architecture, whether statist ‘social housing’ or freemarket inspired, films, videos, modern recording and musical techniques are all due to technological advances made mostly this century. Only in a very puritanical sense could what has happened be thought of as inevitably bringing with it enslavement. All kinds of possibilities are now open to artists and architects, which would have been imaginable a few decades ago. No one is forced to use these possibilities in any specific way.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 38 , March 1995 , pp. 143 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pevsner, N., An Outline of European Architecture. 5th edition, (Harmondsworth:Penguin, 1957), p. 281.Google Scholar

2 Watkin, David, A History of Western Architectur. (London 1986), p. 557.Google Scholar

3 Ibid. p. 558.

4 Ruskin, John, Deucalio. (1875–1883), Vol. I, Ch. II, Section 4.Google Scholar

In writing this paper. I found myself increasingly drawn to Ruskin, and to what he has to say on the subjects of art and technology. This paper is not a paper on Ruskin, nor I do not accept everything Ruskin said on everything. (How could I when Ruskin is notoriousl. inconsistent?) But even though Ruskin is not normally regarded as a philosopher, what I write could be nevertheless regarded as a philosophical homage to our greatest writer on art (not that he would have been pleased at being so described).

5 All this was revealed in the great exhibition of Titian and his contemporaries in the Grand Palais in Paris in 1993. See the catalogue of that exhibition, Le Siecle de Titie. (Paris, 1993), especially illustrations 176, 250,251.

6 Richard Long, Words after the Fact. text in his 1980 catalogue for the d’Offay gallery, London.

7 Plato, Gorgias. 5O3e.

8 Ruskin, John, Lectures on Ar. (1870), Lecture III, Section 71.Google Scholar

9 Ruskin, John, Elements of Drawin. (1857), Section 135.Google Scholar

10 Kant, I., Critique of Judgemen. (1790), Section 46Google Scholar

11 Walden, Sarah, The Ravished Imag. (London 1985), p. 139.Google Scholar

In what I have said about cleaning I have relied closely on Mrs Walden's excellent analysis.

12 See Kant, Critique of Judgement. Section 46.

13 Ruskin, John, Modern Painter. (1860), Vol. 5, Part IX, Section 2.Google Scholar

14 Ruskin, John, Seven Lamps of Architectur. (1849), Ch. II, ‘The Lamp of Truth’, Section 19.Google Scholar

15 Wollheim, R., Painting as an Ar. (London, 1987), p. 86.Google Scholar

16 Eliot, T. S., ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’, in The Sacred Woo. (Methuen, 1960 edition), pp. 47–59, p. 58.Google Scholar

17 Palmer, F., Literature & Moral Understandin. (Oxford, 1992), p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Ruskin, , Lectures on Art. Lecture III, Section 71.Google Scholar

19 Ruskin, John, The Stones of Venic. (1853), Vol. 2, Ch. VI, Section 15.Google Scholar

20 Reynolds, Joshua, Twelfth Discourse to the Royal Academ. (1789).Google Scholar

21 de Tocqueville, A, Democracy in America. Vol. II (1840), Pt IV, Ch. 6.Google Scholar