No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Old Wine in New Bottles? Tillich and Spinoza
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2010
Extract
I Shall begin by making a brief comparison between Spinoza and Tillich and then, in the second half of my paper, ask a few questions, and discuss some details, with regard to the nature of the type of thinking they exhibit which, in the broadest sense of the word, is metaphysical. My interest is not purely historical, although I believe that historical comparisons can throw light on what very many of our contemporaries have in mind. In fact, this is in part my justification for this paper, and it is perhaps as well, at the outset, to make clear the point of view from which I propose to look into the matter.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1968
References
page 134 note 1 Systematic Theology (Chicago, 1951)Google Scholar, i, p. 72. The full discussion of this feature of his thought is to be found on pp. 71–105.
page 135 note 1 Systematic Theology, i, p. 237.
page 136 note 1 Ibid., p. 235.
page 136 note 2 Systematic Theology, ii, pp. 6–10.
page 136 note 3 Systematic Theology, i, p. 245.
page 137 note 1 Systematic Theology, ii, p. 6.
page 137 note 2 Ibid., p. 7.
page 138 note 1 Ibid., p. 7.
page 139 note 1 Ibid., p. 7.
page 139 note 1 Paul Tillich's filosofische Theologie (Utrecht, 1961), p. 52Google Scholar.
page 140 note 1 Systematic Theology, ii, p. 8.
page 140 note 2 Ibid., p. 8.
page 141 note 1 Systematic Theology, i, p. 9.
page 142 note 1 The Courage to Be (New Haven, 1952), p. 180Google Scholar.
page 142 note 2 Systematic Theology, ii, p. 6.
page 142 note 3 ‘Reply to Interpretation and Criticism’, in Kegley, Charles W. and Bretall, Robert W. (eds.), The Theology of Paid Tillich, 4th ed. (New York, 1959), p. 341Google Scholar.
page 146 note 1 Cf. Stutterheim, C. F. P., Problemen der Literatuurwetmschap (Antwerpen Amsterdam, 1953), pp. 238-9Google Scholar.
page 146 note 2 English Philosophy since 1900 (London, 1963), p. 161Google Scholar.
page 146 note 3 Ibid., p. 109.