Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:18:58.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2018

Michael Hauskeller*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Lewis Coyne*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Throughout the remainder of this introduction – and in most of the contributions, unless otherwise stated – “moral enhancement” and “moral bioenhancement” are used interchangeably.

2 Persson, Ingmar and Savulescu, Julian, ‘The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 25:3 (2008), 162–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Persson, Ingmar and Savulescu, Julian, Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Cf. Hauskeller, Michael, Better Humans? Understanding the Human Enhancement Project, London: Routledge, 2013Google Scholar.

5 Harris, John, How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar: ‘[a]ll moral philosophers, and indeed all ethicists, must have an interest in moral enhancement’.