Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:01:51.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution and the Human Mind: how far can we go?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Henry Plotkin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a close coincidence in time between the appearance of psychology as a science and the rise of evolutionary theory. The first laboratory of experimental psychology was established in Germany by Wilhelm Wundt just as Darwin's writings were beginning to have their enormous impact, especially as they might be applied to understanding the human mind (Darwin, 1871). Psychology is an important discipline because it straddles the boundary between the biological sciences and the social or human sciences (defined as those sciences that study exclusively human characteristics) of anthropology, sociology and economics. Given that importance, and given that new sciences lack the conceptual history within which older, established sciences might be mired, it might have been expected that psychology would have embraced in a way that established sciences did not the equally new, sensational and central theorem of biology which spoke to the origins of species as well as the origins of their traits and, crucially, the functions of those traits. Yet for over a century evolutionary theory had virtually no presence in psychology, despite having powerful friends like William James at court (James, 1880).

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 49 , March 2001 , pp. 267 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1959. ‘Methodological suggestions from a comparative psychology of knowledge processes’, Inquiry, 2, 152–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man (London: Murray).Google Scholar
Deacon, T. 1997. The Symbolic Species (London: Norton).Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. 1990. ‘Personality structure: emergence of the 5-factor model’, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1967. ‘Concepts of ethology and their significance in the study of human behaviour’, in Stevenson, H. W., Hess, E. H. and Rheingold, H. L. (eds) (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K. 1996. Rethinking Innateness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. 1957. ‘Cultural anthropology and linguistics’, in Garim, P. (ed.) Report of the 7th Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study. Georgetown University Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 9, 167–73.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1991. ‘Exaptation: a crucial tool for evolutionary psychology’, Journal of Social Issues, 47, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. 1880. ‘Great men, great thoughts, and the environment’, Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–59.Google Scholar
Mandler, G. 1997. Human Nature Explained (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1961. ‘Cause and effect in biology’, Science, 134, 1501–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, H. W., Hess, E. H. and Rheingold, H. L. (eds) 1967. Early Behaviour (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1971. Biology and Knowledge (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct (London: Penguin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotkin, H. 1994. The Nature of Knowledge (London: Allen Lane).Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. 1997. Evolution in Mind (London: Allen Lane).Google Scholar
Razran, G. 1971. Mind in Evolution (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Rose, S., Kamin, L. J. and Lewontin, R. C. 1984. Not in our Genes (London: Penguin).Google ScholarPubMed
Skoyles, J. R. 1997. ‘Evolution's missing link: a hypothesis upon neural plasticity, prefrontal working memory and the origins of modern cognition’, Medical Hypotheses, 48, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. 1996. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics and Creative Lives (New York: Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1963. ‘On the aims and methods of ethology’, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, P. V. 1995. The Communication of the Dead: Earliest Vestiges of the Origin of Articulate Language. 17th Kroon-Voordracht Lecture. Amsterdam, Nederlands Museum.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1974. ‘Parent-offspring conflict’, American Zoologist, 14, 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar