No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2009
1 Robinson, C. J., Register of Merchant Taylors' School (2 vols., Lewes, 1882), i. 100Google Scholar; Bannerman, W. Bruce and Bannerman, W. Bruce (eds.), The registers of St Stephen's Walbrook, and of St Benet Sherehog, London (Harl. Soc. xlix, 1919), p. 14.Google Scholar
2 Wills of John and Thomas Juxon in appendices, pp. 171–92; Visitation, 1633–35, ii 23Google Scholar; Boyd 3723. John Juxon was baptised on 10 April 1579 in Christ Church: Littledale, W. A. (ed.), The registers of Christ Church, Newgate, 1538 to 1754 (Harl. Soc. xxi, 1895), p. 28Google Scholar. In his 1662 will, Archbishop Juxon made a bequest to ‘my cousin Thomas Juxon of Mortlake’: Waters, H. F., Genealogical gleanings in England (2 vols, Boston, Mass., 1901), ii. 1379.Google Scholar
3 Boyd 3725.
4 Guild., Ms. 7670, fos. 106, 111.
5 Thomas was the youngest boy in his class when admitted to the school on 9 December 1619 (all of his classmates had been born between 1607 and 1612) and was last included in the probation list on 11 March 1621: Guild., Merchant Taylors' Company School, probation books, vol. 1 (1607–1651), fos. 88, 90, 92, 97.
6 Arthur Juxon was free of the salters' company and was also engaged in the family's trade of sugar baking in Walbrook: Visitation, 1633–35, ii. 23Google Scholar; Harvey, W. J. (ed.), List of the principal inhabitants of the City of London, 1640 (1886), p. 18.Google Scholar
7 Guild., apprentice binding book of the merchant taylors' company, 1629–35 (MF 316/10), fo. 120.
8 Presentment books of the merchant taylors' company (MF 324/28), vol. 2, unfol.: 25 October 1637.
9 VCH, Surrey, iv. 71Google Scholar; below, appendices, pp. 178, 180–82.
10 Boyd 3726. Nicholas Rainton served as sheriff in 1621–22, lord mayor in 1632–33 and was knighted on 5 May 1633: Beaven, , ii. 55.Google Scholar
11 George Langham was alderman's deputy for the ward of Vintry in 1634 and a City militia captain: Boyd 35379; Visitation, 1633–35, ii. 45Google Scholar where John Juxon is mistakenly called John Jackson of Mortlake.
12 International Genealogical Index, London, St Augustine Watling Street, marriages 27 November 1627; Woodhead, , p. 76Google Scholar; Lindley, , p. 206Google Scholar & n. 35.
13 BL, Harl. Ms. 986, fos. 19, 21. Matthew Sheppard was the half brother of John Juxon, senior, by his mother's third marriage: Visitation, 1633–35, ii. 23, 234Google Scholar. He had a very high rating of £50 in the 1638 London tithe assessment and in 1641 he and Thomas were jointly assessed in London at £8 42s [sic] 8d for the first two subsidies: Dale, p. 182; PRO, E 115/444/57. Sheppard was assessed at £1 is 4d for the latter in Mortlake.
14 The names, dignities and places of all the colonels, lieutenant-colonels, sergeant majors, captains, quarter-masters, lieutenants and ensigns of the City of London [April 1642], BL, 669 f. 6/10; BL, Harl. Ms. 986. fo. 19; Nagel, L. C., ‘The militia of London, 1641–49’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1982) pp. 317–19Google Scholar. On 29 May 1638, Thomas had become a member of the Honourable Artillery Company: Raikes, G. A. (ed.), The ancient vellum book of the Honourable Artillery Company (1890), p. 54.Google Scholar
15 Guild., court minute books of the merchant taylors' company, vol. 9, fos. 233–33v.
16 He was a councillor in 1643–45 and 1648: PRO, SP 19/79/86; CLRO, Jor. 40, fos. 100, 128; Firth and Rait, i. 1146.
17 Below p. 150 & n. 565 and appendices, pp. 189–90 & n. 659; VCH, Somerset, iv. 44Google Scholar; Somerset archaeological and natural history society, xv (1868–1869), i. 41–6Google Scholar; G. E. C., The complete peerage (1932), viii. 488–9.Google Scholar
18 The parish register of St Thomas the Apostle (Harl. Soc. vi, 1881), p. 57Google Scholar; below appendices, p. 190.
19 Boyd 35385; below, appendices, pp. 189–90. Unfortunately, there is no surviving plaque to examine in St Mary Islington as the church was destroyed by bombing during the second world war.
20 Stieg, M. F. (ed.), The diary of John Harington, MP, 1645–53 (Somerset Record Soc. 74, 1977), pp. 28–9, 32, 34, 46, 61, 68.Google Scholar
21 DNB, xxi. 387Google Scholar; G. E. C., Complete baronetage (Exeter, 1903), iii. 306Google Scholar; Kearney, H. F., Strafford in Ireland 1633–41: a study in absolutism (Manchester, 1959), pp. 73, 83, 254–5Google Scholar; Dunlop, R. (ed.), Ireland under the Commonwealth: being a selection of documents relating to the government of Ireland from 1651 to 1659 (2 vols., Manchester, 1913), ii. 603, 655, 698–9Google Scholar; CSP Ireland, 1666–69, p. 651.Google Scholar
22 Burke, , Peerage and baronetage (1967), p. 597Google Scholar. Juxon's will also refers to a loan made by him of £1,000 on statute staple to Colonel Thomas Coote, the brother of Sir Charles Coote, the first earl of Mountrath. Thomas Coote died without issue on 25 November 1671 (below, p. 189). Like Juxon, the Merediths and Cootes held lands in Meath and Queen's counties.
23 Bottigheimer, K. S., English money and Irish land: the ‘adventurers’ in the Cromwellian settlement of Ireland (Oxford, 1971), p. 185Google Scholar; National Archives Ireland, salved chancery pleadings, 2/688.
24 Bottigheimer, , pp. 185, 205.Google Scholar
25 PRO, C 54/3829/39–40, 43–5; ibid., 3918/4, 6; ibid., 3921/17; ibid., 4038/7; CSP Ireland: adventurers 1642–1659, pp. 22, 188, 215, 284, 343, 344, 347, 353.Google Scholar
26 Below, p. 11.
27 PRO, C 54/3547/31. His joint purchaser was Michael Handcorne of High Holborn, gentleman.
28 In his 1659 will, John Juxon (Thomas's nephew) left a bequest of £20 to ‘my kinsman William Juxon in the Barbados’ with the request that his uncle, lieutenant Colonel Thomas Juxon, should take care of it. This may be the same William Juxon, cousin of Thomas Juxon, who was described as ‘late of Virginia’ in the latter's will: PRO, PROB 11/295/206 will of John Juxon of London, merchant; below, p. 190.
29 His 1672 will records that his son William had been left in Dublin to be cured of his ‘melancholy distemper’. It also reveals that he was hopeful that his second marriage would produce a son: below, appendices, p. 188.
30 Below, appendices, pp. 193–6. John Juxon's eldest son, John, had died in 1659 and been buried near his father in St Lawrence Pountney: PROB 11/295/206 the will of John Juxon. Legal action over Thomas Juxon's will may have been taken by agreement among the parties to ensure its implementation and defend it against claims under any previous will or wills. The relevant entry in the probate act books, dated 17 February 1673, gives the opinion that, as the will relates to property in Ireland, it should be sent to Ireland for the authorities there. There is also a reference to material witnesses in Chester and that the bishop of Chester should take evidence from them there: PRO, PROB 29/56, fo, 402.
31 She had undergone a conversion experience in her early twenties and had subsequently become extremely devout (for example, when resident in London, she heard nine or ten sermons each week) and she opposed the stigmatising of the godly as ‘puritans and precisians, and irregular persons, or the like.’ She was also said to have had a strong influence on the religious development of her husband: Denison, Stephen, The monument or tombstone: or a sermon preached at Lawrence Pountney's church in London, November 21, 1619, at the funeral of Mrs Elizabeth Juxon, the late wife of Mr John Juxon (1620), pp. 85–7, 89, 103, 115.Google Scholar
32 Below, p. 175 & nn. 652–4. John Juxon had especially close relations with another minister, Stephen Denison, described as ‘mine especial friend’, a beneficiary of the will and one of its overseers. Denison had apparently lived in the Juxon household for twelve years or more and preached the funeral sermons for both John and his wife. Those sermons had an unmistakenly godly tone, and he was from the very start a determined opponent of Arminianism: below, pp. 174–5, 185; Denison, , The monument or tombstone;Google Scholaridem, Another tombstone; or a sermon preached at Lawrence Pountney's church, London, upon the last day of August… 1626 at the celebration of the funeral of Mr John Juxon, late citizen of the honourable City of London; Tyacke, N., Anti-Cabinists: the rise of English Arminianism c. 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 258–9, 262–3.Google Scholar
33 Burn, J. S., Registrum ecclesiae parochialis (1862), p. 107Google Scholar; Lambeth Palace Library, VH 96/1508, the will of John Juxon of Mortlake, Surrey.
34 PRO, PROB 11/221/69 will of Arthur Juxon. Brooks had been a preacher at St Thomas the Apostle and had previously preached the funeral sermon for Colonel Thomas Rainborowe, who may also have been a member of his church: Greaves and Zaller, i. 101–2; Tolmie, M., The triumph of the saints: the separate churches of London 1616–1649 (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 118, 171, 178Google Scholar. Arthur Juxon also left a bequest of £15 to be distributed to ‘some godly poor people’ chosen by his wife, one of his sons and Thomas Brooks.
35 Below, pp. 187, 190.
36 Lindley, pp. 39–40, 68–9.
37 Below, pp. 49, 50, 58, 61, 70, 72, 74–5, 80, 85, 86, 87, 88–90, 94–5, 97, 99, 106, 107–8, 112, 115,121, 128, 134, 138, 145, 150. A ‘Juxon’ without a forename is recorded as one of the ruling elders chosen on 30 October 1649 for the third classis in the records of the London provincial assembly: Lambeth Palace library, Sion College Mss., I 40.2/E 17, records of the provincial assembly 3 May 1647 — 15 August 1660, fo. 101V. However, Thomas Juxon's parish of St Thomas the Apostle (where his son William was baptised on 14 October 1649) was located in the second classis: Firth and Rait, i. 750. It is more likely, therefore, that the Juxon referred to is Thomas's uncle, Arthur Juxon of St Stephen Walbrook in the third classis, despite the fact that he was apparently a religious Independent: above p. 6 & n. 34.
38 Below, pp. 86, 140. He may also have come under the influence of Thomas Brooks when he preached in St Thomas the Apostle, possibly through his uncle Arthur, but this is purely conjectural.
39 Below, pp. 95–6.
40 Lindley, pp. 278–9. Thomas Juxon's family connections, for example, included Presbyterians such as Richard Byfield and Maurice Gethin, a leading City Independent, Daniel Taylor, and the former Presbyterian turned Independent, Colonel Edmund Harvey: Lindley, , pp. 70, 311Google Scholar; Greaves, and Zaller, , iii. 226–7Google Scholar; PRO, PROB 11/295/206 will of John Juxon. Daniel Williams was also apparently on intimate terms with Juxon and was to subsequendy marry his widow: DNB, xxi. 387.Google Scholar
41 PRO, SP19/1/42; CLRO, militia accounts: money lent for the support of City forces, accounts c.1643–1647/8, book 3, fo. 18. Thomas lent £26–13–4.
42 BL, Harl. Ms. 986, fos. 19, 21; Dillon, H. A. (ed.), ‘On a Ms. list of officers of the London trained bands in 1643’, Archaeologia 3 (1890), p. 138Google Scholar. Captain John Juxon died in the Allhallows, Bread Street, home of his brother-in-law, Maurice Gethin, where he had been nursed during his last days by his sister, Mrs Elizabeth Gethin. Thomas Juxon was also at his dying brother's side. John was buried in St Lawrence Pountney near his late parents on 16 October 1643 after a hero's funeral, with military honours provided by Colonel Harvey and his horse regiment: Lambeth Palace Library, VH 96/1508, will of John Juxon; Guild., Ms. 7670, fo. 119v; Wilson, H. B., A history of the parish of St Lawrence Pountney, London (1831), pp. 135–6Google Scholar; Burn, , Registrant ecclesiae parochialis, p. 107.Google Scholar
43 BL, Harl. Ms. 986, fo. 19; ibid., Sloane Ms. 2035B, fo. 27.
44 Below, pp. 29–32.
45 Below, p. 92.
46 Below, pp. 73, 98, 133, 144. This is a view of Charles I largely confirmed by recent research.
47 Below, p. 93.
48 Below, pp. 47, 68, 72.
49 Below, pp. 102, 157–8.
50 Below, p. 51.
51 Below, p. 103.
52 Below, p. 94.
53 Below, p. 103.
54 Below, p. 137.
55 Below, p. 169.
56 Nagel, ‘The militia of London, 1641–49’, appendix 4, p. 318; Lindley, , pp. 377–8.Google Scholar
57 Nagel, appendix 5, p. 319; Lindley, , p. 388Google Scholar; A pair of spectacles for the City (4 Dec 1647), BL, E419/9, p. 9.Google Scholar
58 C 219/46/11; CJ, vii. 595, 600, 609, 622–3, 634, 637, 711–12Google Scholar; Rutt, J. T. (ed.), Diary of Thomas Burton (4 vols., 1828), iii. 560; iv. 211.Google Scholar
59 CSPD Ireland, 1660–62, pp. 101, 337Google Scholar. His 1672 will suggests he had been a resident of Dublin for some time. There is a reference to plate and other goods in Dublin; bequests were made to two Dublin parsons; his son William had been left there to be cured of his ‘melancholy distemper’; and an earlier will made by Thomas Juxon had been lodged with an official of the exchequer in Dublin: below, appendices, pp. 188–91.
60 He was elected fourth warden of the merchant taylors on 30 July 1669; was sworn a warden's substitute and an assistant of the company on 6 August 1669; was elected head or master warden on 12 July 1670; and was attending meetings of the court of assistants in April 1672: Guild., court minute books of the merchant taylors' company, vol. 10, pp. 245, 248, 321, 445–7.
61 His will refers to a bequest to his new wife of all his plate and goods in Dublin ‘and going thither’, indicating that a move of household was in progress at the time the will was made: below, appendices, p. 189.
62 National Library of Ireland (Genealogical Office), funeral entries, vol. 4, Ms. 67, fo. 178; ibid., vo. 11, Ms. 74, fo. 8. The design of Juxon's shield is laid out in the first entry. His widow was to marry Daniel Williams in 1675: DNB, xxi. 387.Google Scholar
You have
Access