Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:19:06.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

Extract

Early modern English Parliaments were institutional events: institutional because they occupied a significant role in the governance of the realm, and after the Reformation Parliament statute law became omnicompetent. Furthermore, they established and followed (more or less) fixed procedures and had a permanent clerical staff. However, they were also events, summoned and dissolved at irregular intervals by the monarch, at least until the passage of the Triennial Act in February 1641. The very nature of the assembly and its power, influence and role in English society and politics has been hotly debated by historians for many years and continues today to fill the pages of scholarly journals and the catalogues of publishers. No less controversial than the nature and role of the assembly is the impact and validity of its sources, official and unofficial. It is the aim of this introduction and the ensuing editorials and documents to discuss and deconstruct the nature of parliamentary sources and how they can be utilised in the study of parliamentary history.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Elton, G. R., The Parliament of England, 1559–1581 (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 32–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, David L., The Stuart Parliaments, 1603–1689 (London, 1999), p. 205 n. 99.Google Scholar

2 16 Charles I cap. 1. But see the contemporary discussion on the frequency and calling of Parliaments discussed in Pauline Croft, ‘Annual Parliaments and the Long Parliament’, HR lix (1986), pp. 155–71Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Debate on Annual Parliaments in the Early Seventeenth Century’, PER xvi (1996), pp. 163–74.Google Scholar

3 Croft, Pauline, ‘Libels, Popular Literacy and Public Opinion in Early Modern England’, HR lxviii (1995), pp. 266–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘The Reputation of Robert Cecil: Libels, Political Opinion and Popular Awareness in the Early Seventeenth Century’, TRHS 6th ser. i (1991), pp. 4369.Google Scholar

4 Cust, Richard, ‘News and Politics in Early Seventeenth Century England’, P&P cxii (1986), pp. 6090Google Scholar; idem, ‘Politics and the Electorate in the 1620s’, Conflict in Early Stuart England, ed. Cust, Richard and Hughes, Ann (London, 1989), pp. 134–67Google Scholar; Cust, Richard and Lake, Peter, ‘Sir Richard Grosvenor and the Rhetoric of Magistracy’, BIHR liv (1981), pp. 4053.Google Scholar

5 Cogswell, Thomas, The Blessed Revolution: English Politics and the Coming of War, 1621–1624 (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar; idem, ‘Thomas Middleton and the Court, 1624: A Game at Chess in Context’, HLQ xlviii (1984), pp. 273–88.Google Scholar

6 Jones, Norman L., God and the Moneylenders: Usury and Law in Early Modern England (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar

7 Kelsey, Sean, Inventing a Republic: The Political Culture of the English Commonwealth (Manchester, 1997).Google Scholar

8 The volume Parliament at Work Parliamentary Committees, Access and Lobbying under the Tudors and Stuarts (Boydell and Brewer, forthcoming) edited by myself and Jason Peacey, adds further to our knowledge of how Parliament operated on a day-to-day basis.

9 Morrill, John, ‘Reconstructing the History of Early Stuart Parliaments’, Archives xxi 91 (1994). 67.Google Scholar

10 See below n. 45.

11 CJ, i. 1391057.Google Scholar

12 It is tempting to attribute the loss of the fair-copy Journals not to fire, but to the light fingers of Sir Simonds D'Ewes. His ‘borrowing’ of the Elizabethan Journals is well known and his parliamentary diary for 1624 (BL, Harl. 159) is based partly on the Underclerk's Journal. On D'Ewes and the Elizabethan Journals see Dean, David, Lawmaking and Society in Late Elizabethan England (Cambridge, 1996), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 See Proceedings 1628, p. 2Google Scholar; Lambert, Sheila, ‘The Clerks and Records of the House of Commons, 1600–1640’, BIHR xliii (1970), pp. 215–31.Google Scholar

14 CJ, ii. 12Google Scholar. I am grateful to Jason Peacey for this reference.

15 Hexter, J. H., ‘Parliament under the Lens’, British Studies Monitor iii (19721973), pp. 415Google Scholar; idem, ‘Quoting the Commons, 1604–1642’, Tudor Rule and Revolution, ed. Guth, DeLloyd J. and McKenna, John W. (Cambridge, 1982), pp. 369–91Google Scholar; Morrill, , ‘Reconstructing the History’, pp. 6772Google Scholar; idem, ‘Paying One's D'Ewes’, PH xiv (1995), pp. 179–86Google Scholar; idem, ‘Getting Over D'Ewes’, PH xv (1996), pp. 221–30Google Scholar; Jansson, Maija, ‘Dues Paid’, PH xv (1996), pp. 215–20.Google Scholar

16 Russell, Conrad, Parliaments and English Politics, 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979), p. xixCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ruigh, Robert E., The Parliament of 1624: Politics and Foreign Policy (Camb. MA, 1971).Google Scholar

17 Smith, , Stuart Parliaments, pp. 1314Google Scholar; Morrill, , ‘Reconstructing the History’, p. 71Google Scholar; Jansson, , ‘Dues Paid’, p. 220.Google Scholar

18 See Morrill, , ‘Reconstructing the History’, p. 71.Google Scholar

19 Ibid. p. 70.

20 Morrill, , ‘Paying One's D'Ewes’, pp. 185–6.Google Scholar

21 Hexter, , ‘Quoting the Commons’, p. 391.Google Scholar

22 Notestein, Wallace and Reif, Frances, eds, Commons Debates 1629 (Minnesota, 1921)Google Scholar, CD 1629, pp. xxxliGoogle Scholar; Gust, , ‘News and Politics’, pp. 6090Google Scholar; idem, The Forced Loan and English Politics 1626–1628 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 155, 158, 168Google Scholar; Cogswell, Thomas, ‘Politics and Propaganda: Charles I and the People in the 1620s’, JBS xxix (1990), pp. 187215CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Underground Verse and the Transformation of Early Stuart Political Culture’, Political Culture and Cultural Politics in Early Modern England, ed. Amussen, S. D. and Kishlansky, Mark A. (Manchester, 1995), pp. 277300.Google Scholar

23 See, for example, the correspondence of John Lister with the Hull corporation in Hull RO, L. 166–70, and the numerous letters reproduced in the Yale Proceedings in Parliament volumes. I am grateful to Simon Healy for the Hull references.

24 Snow, Vernon, ed., Parliament in Elizabethan England: John Hooker's Order and Usage, (New Haven, 1977), p. 172Google Scholar. For a specific incidence see HLRO, Main Papers, 13 March 1624, order for Lord Danvers to have a copy of the Goathland manor bill.

25 Kyle, Chris R. and Peacey, Jason, ‘“Under cover of so much coming and going’: Public Access to Parliament and the Political Process in Early Modern England’Google Scholar in idem. eds, Parliament at Work (forthcoming).

26 See for example the Guildhall collection noted below, p. 7. Scribal petitions can be found in vast quantities in HLRO, Main Papers.

27 Proceedings 1614, p.99Google Scholar; CD 1621, ii. 32.Google Scholar

28 PRO, STAC 8/128/11, pt. 2; GL, Broadside 23.105. I am grateful to Andrew Thrush for the PRO reference.

29 Hirst, Derek, The Representative of the People? (Cambridge, 1975), p. 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Peacey, Jason, ‘Making Parliament Public: Privacy, Print and Political Accountability during the Civil Wars and Interregnum’Google Scholar. I am grateful to Dr Peacey for showing me a copy of his paper in advance of publication.

31 See, for example, Cromartie, AlanThe Printing of Parliamentary Speeches, November 1640–July 1642’, HJ xxxiii (1990), pp. 2344Google Scholar; Lambert, Sheila, ed., Printing for Parliament, 1641–1700 (List and Index Society, xx, 1984)Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Beginning of Printing for the House of Commons, 1640–1642’, The Library, 6th ser. iii (1981), pp. 4361.Google Scholar

32 GL, Broadsides. These are scattered throughout the Guildhall collection. They are undated, but are identifiable by cross-referencing against the 1621 Journals and debates and by annotations in the same hand.

33 Gardiner, S. R., ed., Reports of Cases in the Courts of Star Chamber and High Commission (Camden Society, new ser., xxxix, 1886), 3740Google Scholar; PRO, STAC 8/128/11, pt. 2. In 1641 Robert Jager, attending at Westminster to help with business for Sandwich, informed the corporation that with their case to be freed from the subsidy, ‘I have put it forth to print that every men of the House may have one’. CKS, Sa/C4, unbound letters, Robert Jager to Sandwich, 10 March 1641. I owe this reference to Jason Peacey.

34 Jackson, William A., ed., Records of the Court of the Stationers' Company, 1602–1640 (London, 1957), p. 166.Google Scholar

35 I am currently engaged in research on these petitions. My preliminary findings were given in a paper entitled ‘Parliament, Print and Petitions in Early Seventeenth Century England’ at the North American Conference on British Studies (Cambridge MA, 1999).

36 Prayers for the Parliament (?1604); Prayers for the Parliament (?1605–6); A Prayer for the Speaker of the Commons House of Parliament (London, ?1606); Society of Antiquaries, Broadside no. 176, Prayers for the Parliament (1621)Google Scholar; Wilson, John F., Pulpit in Parliament (Oxford, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trevor-Roper, H. R., ‘The Fast Sermons of the Long Parliament’, Essays in British History Presented to Sir Keith Feiling, ed. Trevor-Roper, , (London, 1964), pp. 85138.Google Scholar

37 Society of Antiquaries, Broadside no. 182.

38 Herford, C. H., Percy, and Simpson, Evelyn, eds, Ben Jonson (ii vols, Oxford, 19251952)Google Scholar, viii in Epigrammes (1612)Google Scholar, no. 24. See also jonson's description of the King's procession to Parliament in 1604, ft Jon[son]; His Part of King James his Royall and Magnificent Entertainement… (London, 1604).Google Scholar

39 Dee, John, To the Honorable Assemblie of the Commons in the present Parlament (1604)Google Scholar, Corpus Christi College, Oxford, F.A.1.10 (38, 39); Henry E. Huntington Library, San Marino, California, RB 41808, 41809; Bodleian, 40.S.2 (73, b)JUR; Ashmole MS 133 (3, 4); Lincoln College, Oxford, 0.3.15; BL, RB C.21.b.25 (2).

40 Taylor, John, The Subjects Joy for the Parliament (1621)Google Scholar, Society of Antiquaries, Broadside no. 177.

41 See for example BL, Harl. 7608, fols 382v–87; GL, Broadside 23.120. Alford took notes on the dorse of his copy of this petition whilst sitting in the House that morning. For other examples see GL, Broadside 24.31; Society of Antiquaries, Broadside no. 216; Hampshire Record Office, Jervoise Papers, Scrapbook TD/54O; BL, Harl. 7607, fols 393–404; The Queen's College, Oxford, Sel.b.229, no. 2; GL, Broadsides 23.122, 123.

42 Society of Antiquaries, Broadside nos 281, 282. See also no. 221 for a rare engraving of Convocation with a list of the Members present in 1624. See, for example, The Names of the Knights for Parliament 1625 (1625)Google Scholar. Numerous other lists are noted in the STC, 2nd edn, i. 351–2.

43 Russell, , Parliaments and English PoliticsGoogle Scholar; Kishlansky, Mark A., Parliamentary Selection: Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gust, , ‘Politics and the Electorate’, esp. pp. 136, 158–62.Google Scholar

44 Hartley, T. E., ed., Proceedings in the Parliaments of Elizabeth I (3 vols, Leicester, 19811995).Google Scholar

45 Foster, Elizabeth Read, ed., Proceedings in Parliament 1610 (2 vols, New Haven, 1966)Google Scholar; Jansson, Maija, ed., Proceedings in Parliament 1614 (House of Commons) (Philadelphia, 1988)Google Scholar; Notestein, Wallace, Reif, Frances Helen and Sirapson, Hartley, eds, Commons Debates 1621 (7 vols, New Haven, 1935)Google Scholar; Jansson, Maija and Bidwell, William B., eds, Proceedings in Parliament 1625 (New Haven, 1987)Google Scholar; Bidwell, William B. and Jansson, Maija, eds, Proceedings in Parliament 1626 (4 vols, New Haven, 19911996)Google Scholar; Keeler, Mary Freer, Cole, Maija Jansson, and Bidwell, William B., Proceedings in Parliament 1628 (6 vols, New Haven, 19771983)Google Scholar; Notestein, Wallace and Reif, Frances Helen, eds, Commons Debates for 1629 (Minneapolis, 1921)Google Scholar; Notestein, Wallace, ed., The Journal of Sir Simonas D'Ewes from the Beginning of the Long Parliament to the Opening of the Trial of the Earl of Strafford (New Haven, 1923)Google Scholar; Coates, Willson H., ed., The Journal of Sir Simonds D'Ewes from the Final Recess of the Long Parliament to the Withdrawl of King Charles from London (New Haven, 1942)Google Scholar; Jansson, Maija, ed., Proceedings in the Opening Session of the Long Parliament (3 11 16401620 03 1641, 2 vols, London, 2000)Google Scholar; idem, ed., Two Diaries of the Lang Parliament (Gloucester and New York, 1984)Google Scholar; Coates, Willson H., Young, A. S. and Snow, Vernon F., eds, The Private Journals of the Long Parliament (3 vols, New Haven, 19821992)Google Scholar. See also the parliamentary volumes in die Camden series: Samuel Rawson Gardiner, ed., Parliamentary Debates in 1610 (Camden Soc., OS, xxxi, 1862)Google Scholar; de Villiers, Lady, ed., ‘The Hastings Journal of the Parliament of 1621’, in Camden Miscellany (Camden Soc., 3rd ser., xxxiii, 1953)Google Scholar; Gardiner, Samuel Rawson, ed., Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords 1621 (Camden Soc., OS, ciii, 1870)Google Scholar; Relf, Frances Helen, Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords, 1621–1628 (Camden Soc., 3rd ser., xlii, 1929)Google Scholar; Gardiner, Samuel Rawson, ed., Notes of the Debates in the House of Lords, 1624 and 1626 (Camden Soc., 2nd ser., xxiv, 1879)Google Scholar; idem, ed., Debates in the House of Commons in 1625 (Camden Soc., 2nd ser., vi, 1873).Google Scholar

46 Willson, David Harris, ed., The Parliamentary Diary of Robert Bouyer, 1606–1607 (Minneapolis, 1977).Google Scholar