Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:18:57.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workspaces of a walking machine and their graphical representation. Part I: kinematic workspaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

S. J. Zhang
Affiliation:
The Machines, Kinematics and Robotics Group, Research Institute for Design, Manufacturing and Marketing, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT (U.K.)
D. J. Sanger
Affiliation:
The Machines, Kinematics and Robotics Group, Research Institute for Design, Manufacturing and Marketing, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT (U.K.)
D. Howard
Affiliation:
The Machines, Kinematics and Robotics Group, Research Institute for Design, Manufacturing and Marketing, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT (U.K.)

Summary

This paper addresses the kinematic workspaces of a walking machine and their graphical representation. The workspaces for walking machines are denned and the methods for investigating various workspaces are presented; the kinematic workspace constraints are established; the displacement is analysed; an algorithm for investigation of kinematic workspaces is presented; and the position and orientation kinematic workspaces are analysed and graphically represented for an example walking machine design.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gosselin, C., “Determination of the Workspace of 6-Dof Parallel ManipulatorsASME, J. Mechanical Design 112, 331–33 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Clement, M., Gosselin, C., Eric, L. and Pierre, T., “An Efficient Algorithm for the Graphical Representation of the Three-dimensional Workspace of Parallel ManipulatorsProceedings of 22nd ASME Mechanisms Conference,Scottsdale, AZ.(1992) DE-45, pp. 323328.Google Scholar
3.Gupta, K.C., “On the Nature of Robot WorkspaceInt. J. Robotics Research 5(2), 112121 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kumar, A. and Waldron, K.J., “The Workspace of Mechanical ManipulatorASME. J. Mechanical Design 103, 665672 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sugimoto, K. and Duffy, J., “Determination of Extreme Distances of a Robot Hand. Part 1: A General TheoryASMEJ. of Mechanical Design 103, 631636 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sugimoto, K. and Duffy, J., “Determination of Extreme Distances of a Robot Hand. Part 2: Robot Arms with Special GeometryASME. J. of Mechanical Design 103, 776783 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gupta, K.C. and Roth, B., “Design Consideration for Manipulator WorkspaceASME. J. of Mechanical Design 104,704712 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Davidson, J.K. and Hunt, K.H., “Rigid Body Location and Robot Workspace: Some Alternative Manipulator FormsASME. J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 109(2), 224232 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Masory, O. and Wang, J., “Workspace Evaluation of Stewart Platforms” Proceedings of 22nd ASME Mechanisms Conference,Scottsdale AZ(1992) DE-45, pp. 337346.Google Scholar
10.Zhang, S.J., Sanger, D.J. and Howard, D., “The Mechanics of Parallel Mechanisms and Walking Machines” Proceedings of IMechE, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 208(C6), 367377 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar