Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:26:28.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VAL-II, a language for hierarchical control of a robot-based automated factory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

C. A. J. Braganca  and
P. Sholl
C. A. J. Braganca
Affiliation:
Unimation (Europe) Ltd, Unit C, Stafford Park 18, Telford, Shropshire TF 3 3AX (U.K.)
P. Sholl
Affiliation:
Unimation (Europe) Ltd, Unit C, Stafford Park 18, Telford, Shropshire TF 3 3AX (U.K.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

SUMMARY

The goal of manufacturing system development today is the integration of basic production elements to suit a variety of industrial and shop floor requirements. This may seem an awesome goal, but the authors suggest that careful assessment of requirement at each level and an appreciation of the true level of complexity needed at each level for control purposes, systematic integration will be possible as products become commercially available.

Six levels of integration can be defined for robot-based applications: Level 1 - the single robot application level Level 2 - the system with robots working in teams Level 3 - the combination of different robot systems Level 4 - the combination of feeding work automatically to islands of automation from fully automated warehouses. Level 5 - the integration of planning and control functions Level 6 - the integration of CAD based design functions.

The approach to integration and the level to which it extends will to a large extent be determined by a company's objective, present computer capacity, general production capability and availability of appropriate flexible automation products and systems for use in a given industrial environment. This paper examines the global needs of hierarchical integration, the level of control needed and the implication of VAL-II to this end.

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 265 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Albus, J.S., Barbera, A.J. and Fitzgerald, M.L., “Programming a hierarchical robot control System” Proc. 12th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Paris, France (9–11 06, 1982).Google Scholar
2.Hasegawa, K., Suzuki, K., Masuda, R. and Kodo, M., “Programming and teaching methods for industrial robots” Proc. 4th Int. Symp. Industrial Robots (11 19–21, 1974).Google Scholar
3.Albus, J., McLean, C., Barbera, A. and Fitzgerald, M., “Hierarchical control for robots in an automated factory” 13th Intern. Symp. of Industrial Robots, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. (17–21 04, 1983).Google Scholar
4.Braganca, C., “Designing a real-time robot system” 2nd International conference on F.M.S., London, U.K. (26–28 10 1983).Google Scholar
5.Espejo, R., “Complimentarity Control-Autonomy” Working Papers Series, University of Aston, England (06, 1982).Google Scholar
6.Braganca, C., “An advanced robot programming language for sensor based robot systems” I.E.E. Conference on Flexible Automation Systems, London, U.K. (07, 1984).Google Scholar
7.Sholl, P. and Laughlin, C., “Practical solution to real time path control of a robot” Rovisec, London (1984).Google Scholar
8.User's guide to VAL-II, Version 3, Unimation Inc.Google Scholar