Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:23:14.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A smart hydraulic joint for future implementation in robotic structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

J. Berring ,
K. Kianfar ,
C. Lira ,
C. Menon  and
F. Scarpa
J. Berring
Affiliation:
MENRVA Group, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
K. Kianfar
Affiliation:
MENRVA Group, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
C. Lira
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, UK
C. Menon*
Affiliation:
MENRVA Group, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
F. Scarpa
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A hydraulic flexible joint inspired by the actuation system of spiders is investigated in this paper. Its design and characteristics are discussed and a mathematical model is developed to describe its static behaviour. Results of experimental tests are presented to validate its performance. A comparison to other hydraulic actuation systems is performed. The use of the proposed hydraulic flexible joint in adaptive robotic structures is addressed and discussed.

Keywords

Hydraulic systemSmart actuatorFlexible structure
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 28 , Issue 7 , December 2010 , pp. 1045 - 1056
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anderson, J. F. and Prestwich, K. N., “The fluid pressure pumps of spiders (Chelicerata, Araneae),” Z. Morphol Tiere 81, 257–277 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Menon, C. and Lira, C., “Active articulation for future space applications inspired by the hydraulic system of spiders,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 1, 52–61 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Pilkauskas, K., Gaidys, R. and Lira, C., , C., “Adaptive Structures Based on Smart Stick Concept for Robotic Applications,” Proceedings of the IMAC XXV Conference on Structural Dynamics, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
4.Lira, C. and Pilkauskas, K., “Embedded Novel Actuators for Toy Applications,” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, Baden bei Wien, Austria, pp. 228–231 (2006).Google Scholar
5.Lira, C. and Scarpa, F., “Adaptive Structures for Manipulation in Clean Room,” Proceedings of SPIE 15th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, California. Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies pp. 9–13 (2008).Google Scholar
6.Schulz, S., Pylatiuk, C. and Bretthauer, G., “A New Ultralight Anthropomorphic Hand,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Seul, Corea (2001).Google Scholar
7.Kargov, A., Asfour, T., Pylatiuk, C., Oberle, R., Klosek, H., Schulz, S/ and Regenstein, K.., “Development of an Anthropomorphic Hand for a Mobile Assistive Robot,” IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics June 28–July 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, USA (2005).Google Scholar
8.Schulz, S., Pylatiuk, C., Reischl, M., Martin, J., Mikut, R. and Bretthauer, G., “A hydraulically driven multifunctional prosthetic hand,” Robotica 23, 293–299 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Osswald, D., Martin, J., Burghart, C., Mikut, R., Wörn, H. and Bretthauer, G., “Integrating a flexible anthropomorphic, robot hand into the control, system of a humanoid robot,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 48 (4), 213–221 (31 Oct. 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pylatiuk, C., Schulz, S., Kargov, A. and Bretthauer, G., “Two multiarticulated hydraulic hand prostheses,” Artif. Organs 28 (11), 980–986 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Kargov, A., Pylatiuk, C., Oberle, R., Klosek, H., Werner, T., Roessler, W. and Schulz, S., “Development of a Multifunctional Cosmetic Prosthetic Hand,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, The Netherlands (12–15 Jun. 2007).Google Scholar
12.Ikuta, K., Ichikawa, H., Suzuki, K. and Yamamoto, K., “Micro Hydrodynamic Actuated Multiple Segments Catheter for Safety Minimally Invasive Therapy,” Proceedings of the 1003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan (14–19 Sep. 2003).Google Scholar
13.Fukuda, T., Shuxiang, G., Kosuge, K., Arai, F., Negoro, M. and Nakabayashi, K., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1994).Google Scholar
14.Shuxiang, G., Fukuda, T., Kosuge, K., Arai, F., Oguro, K. and Negoro, M., “Micro Catheter System with Active Guide Wire,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1995).Google Scholar
15.Ikuta, K., Ichikawa, H., Suzuki, K. and Yajima, D., “Multi-Degree of Freedom Hydraulic Pressure Driven Safety Active Catheter,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2006).Google Scholar
16.Ikuta, K., Ichikawa, H., Yajima, D., “Hydraulic Pressure Drive with Multi-degrees of Freedom Motion for Safety Active Catheter,” IEEE International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (2005).Google Scholar
17.Bailly, Y., Chauvin, A. and Amirat, Y., “Control of a High Dexterity Micro-Robot Based Catheter for Aortic Aneurysm Treatment,” IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (2004).Google Scholar
18.Peirs, J., Reynaerts, D. and Van Brussel, H., “A Miniature Hydraulic Parallel Manipulator for Integration in a Self-Propelling Endoscope,” EUROSENSORS XIII The 13th European Conference on Solid-State Transducers, The Hague, The Netherlands (12–15 Sep. 1999).Google Scholar
19.Peirs, J., Reynaerts, D. and Van Brussel, H., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors Actuators A 92 (1–3), 343–349 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Barai, R. K. and Nonami, K., “Robust Adaptive Fuzzy Control Law for Locomotion Control of a Hexapod Robot Actuated by Hydraulic Actuators with Dead Zone,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China (9–15 Oct. 2006).Google Scholar
21.Barai, R. K. and Nonami, K., “Locomotion control of a hydraulically actuated hexapod robot by robust adaptive fuzzy control and dead-zone compensation,” Robotica 25, 269–281 (2006) (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Barai, R. K. and Nonami, K., “Optimal two-degree-of-freedom fuzzy control for locomotion control of a hydraulically actuated hexapod robot,” Inf. Sci. 177 (8), 1892–1915 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hartikainen, H. and Lehtinen, K., “Control and Software Structures of a Hydraulic Six-Legged Machine Designed for Locomotion in Natural Environment,” Proceedings of IEEEDSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems (1992) pp. 590–596.Google Scholar
24.Becker, O., Pietsch, I. and Hesselbach, J., “Robust task-space control of hydraulic robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2003).Google Scholar
25.Urban, V., Wapler, M., Neugebauer, J., Hille, A., Stallkamp, J. and Weisener, T., “Robot-assisted surgery system with kinesthetic feedback,” J. Image-Guid. Surg. 3 (4), 205–209 (1999).Google Scholar
26.Oelhydraulik, H., “HEXAMOVE Product Information (Lucerne, Switzerland 1997).Google Scholar
27.Mutzenich, S., Vinay, T. and Rosengarten, G., “Analysis of a novel micro-hydraulic actuation for MEMS,” Sensors Actuators A 116 (2004)525–529 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.De Voldera, M., Peirsa, J., Reynaertsa, D., Coosemansb, J., Puersb, R., Smalc, O. and Raucentc, B., “A novel hydraulic microactuator sealed by surface tension,” Sensors Actuators A 123–124, 547–554 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Wu, C. L., Yang, J. Ch., Chen, Y. Ch., “Low Power Consumption PZT Actuated Micro-Pump, Microsystems, Packaging,” Assembly Conference Taiwan, 2006. IMPACT 2006. International, IEEE (2006) pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
30.Laser, D. J. and Santiago, J. G., “A review of micropumps,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 14, R35–R64 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Fichter, E. F., Fichter, B. L., “A Survey of Legs of Insects and Spiders from a Kinematic Perspective,” IEEE (1998).Google Scholar
32.Beer, F. P. and Johnston, E., Mechanics of Materials (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981).Google Scholar
33.Howell, L. L., Compliant Mechanisms (Wiley, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
34.Timoshenko, S. P. and Gere, J. M., Theory of Elastic Stability (McGraw Hill, 1961).Google Scholar
35.Menon, C., Li, Y., Sameoto, D. and Martens, C., “Abigaille-I: Towards the Development of a Spider-Inspired Climbing Robot for Space Use,” IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA (2008).Google Scholar
36.Sameoto, D., Li, Y. and Menon, C., “Multi-scale compliant foot designs and fabrication for use with a spider-inspired climbing robot,” J. Bionic Eng. 5 (3), 189–196 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Pretto, I., Ruffieux, S., Menon, C., Ijspeert, A. J. and Cocuzza, S., “A point-wise model of adhesion suitable for real-time applications of bio-inspired climbing robots,” J. Bionic Eng. 5 (1), 98–105 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Menon, C. and Sitti, M., “A biomimetic climbing robot based on the gecko,” J. Bionic Eng., Elsevier, 3 (3), 115–125 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Kim, S., Spenko, M., Trujillo, S., Heyneman, B., Santos, D., Cutkosky, M. R., “Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 24 (1) (2008).Google Scholar
40.Lira, C., Menon, C., Kianfar, K., Scarpa, F. and Mani, M., “Mining Smartness from the Hydraulic System of Spiders: A Bioinspired Actuator for Advanced Applications,” Advances in Science and Technology (Trans Tech Publications, 2008) vol 58, pp. 114–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Rotomation, A032 Subminiature Dual Rack Actuator, Data Sheet and Ordering Information, [Online]. Available <http://www.rotomation.com/download/minact.pdf> (Jul. 2009).+(Jul.+2009).>Google Scholar
42.Prior, S. D., White, A. S., Gill, R., Parsons, J. T. and Warner, P. R.. A Novel Pneumatic Actuator (Advanced Manufacturing and Mechatronics Centre, Faculty of Technology, Middlesex University).Google Scholar
43.Prior, S. D. and White, A. S., “Measurements and simulation of a pneumatic muscle actuator for a rehabilitation robot,” Simul. Pract. Theory 3, 81–117 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.FSETO, DSR-DSRL Datasheet. [Online]. Available <http://www.festo.com/rep/de/assets/pdf/722824d6.pdf> (Jul. 2009).+(Jul.+2009).>Google Scholar
45.De Greef, A., Lambert, P. and Delchambre, A., “Towards flexible medical instruments: Review of flexible fluidic actuators,” Precis. Eng. 33 (4), 311–321 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar