Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:37:56.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust and adaptive position/force stabilization of robotic manipulators in contact tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Y. Ekalo  and
M. Vukobratović
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Control laws are described for solving the task of stabilization of motion and force of interaction of a robot with its environment with a prescribed quality of transient processes with respect to position and in the presence of control, motion, and interaction force constraints. The robustness of these laws to parametric perturbations and their stability with respect to initial and external perturbations and measuring sensor errors have been proven.

Keywords

Adaptive stabilizationContact tasksControl lawsRobot's environment.
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 373 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Raibert, M.H. & Craig, J.J., “Hybrid Position/Force Control of Manipulators” Trans. ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 102, No. 3, 126–133 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mason, M.T., “Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators” IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-11, No. 6, 418–432 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hogan, N., “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation” Part 1-Theory, Part 2-Implementation, Part 3 - Application, J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 107, 1–24 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Paul, R.P., “Problems and Research Issues Associated with the Hybrid Control of Force and Displacement” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1987) pp. 1966–1971.Google Scholar
5.Yoshikawa, T., Sugie, T. & Tanaka, M., “Dynamic Hybrid Position/Force Control of Robot Manipulators-Controller Design and Experiment” IEEE J. Robotics and Automation 4, No. 6, 699–705 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.De Luca, A. & Manes, C., “Hybrid Force/Position Control for Robots in Contact with Dynamic Environments” Proc. of Robot Control, SYROCO '91, (1991) pp. 377–382.Google Scholar
7.De Luca, A. & Manes, C., “On the Modelling of Robots in Contact with a Dynamic Environment”Proc. 5th Intern. Conference on Advanced Robotics,Pisa(1991) pp. 568–574.Google Scholar
8.Timofeev, A.V. & Ekalo, Yu.V., “Stability and Stabilization of Programmed Motion of Robot-Manipulator” (in Russian) Automatics and Remote Control No. 10, 148–156 (1976).Google Scholar
9.Kelly, R., Carelli, R., Amestegui, M. & Ortega, R., “On Adaptive Impedance Control of Robot Manipulators” Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation(1989) pp. 572–577.Google Scholar
10.Timofeev, A.V., Control of Robots (in Russian) (Leningrad University Publisher, 1986).Google Scholar
11.Yakubovitch, V.A., “Finite-Convergent Algorithms of the Systems of Inequalities Solving and their Applications to the Tasks of Adaptive Systems Synthesis” (in Russian), USSR Academy of Science Reports 189, No. 3, 495–498 (1969).Google Scholar
12.Timofeev, A.V. & Ekalo, Yu.V., “The Industrial Robots Adaptive Control Systems” Proc. 20th ISIR, Tokyo, Japan (Oct. 4–6, 1989) pp. 1111–1116.Google Scholar