Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:14:48.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A qualitative theoretical framework for ‘common-sense’ based multiple contact robotic manipulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Summary

This paper presents a qualitative theoretical formulation for synthesis and analysis of multiple contact dexterous manipulation of an object, using a robot hand. The motivation for a qualitative theory is to build a formalisation of ‘human-like’ common-sense reasoning in robotic manipulation. Using this formalisation, a robot hand can perform finger-tip manipulative movements by analysing the physical laws that govern the robot hand, the object, and their interaction. Traditionally, such analysis have been framed in quantitative terms leading to mathematical systems which become intractable very quickly. Also, quantitative synthesis and analysis, often demand an accurate specification of the parameters in the universe of discourse, which is almost impossible to provide. The qualitative approach inherently encounters both these problems successfully.

The qualitative theory is presented in three developmental stages. A qualitative framework of spatial information in the context of dexterous manipulation has been provided. Qualitative models of an object configuration and transformations in them that occur during a manipulation process, have been developed. Finally, the development of a ‘quasi-static’ qualitative framework of a dexterous manipulation process that performs the desired object transformation, has been presented.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Elliott, J.M. and Conolly, K.J., “A Classification of Manipulative Hand MovementsDevelopment Medicine and Child Neurology 26, 283296 (1984)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hay, L., “The Development of Movement Control” The Psychology of Human Movement (Academic Press, New York, 1984) pp. 241266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Feigenbaum, E.A., “The Art of Artificial Intelligence: Themes and Case Studies in Knowledge EngineeringProcs. of IJCAI (1977) pp. 10141029.Google Scholar
4.Minsky, M., The Society of Mind (Simon and Schuster, NY, 1985).Google Scholar
5.Lenat, D.B. and Feigenbaum, E.A., “On the Thresholds of KnowledgeProcs. of IJCA1 (1987) pp. 11731182.Google Scholar
6.Moore, R.C., “The Role of Logic in Knowledge Representation and Common-Sense reasoningProcs. of AAA1–82 (1982) pp. 428433.Google Scholar
7.Dekleer, J. and Brown, J.S., “A Qualitative Physics Based on ConfluencesAI-24 (1984) pp. 783.Google Scholar
8.Dekleer, J., “Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Classical MechanicsMIT AI-TR-352 (Dec., 1975).Google Scholar
9.Forbus, K.D., “Qualitative Process TheorymAl–24 (1984) pp. 85168.Google Scholar
10.Forbus, K.D., “A Study of Qualitative and Geometric Knowledge in Reasoning about MotionMiT Al-TR 615 (02., 81).Google Scholar
11.Kuipers, B., “Qualitative SimulationAI-29, (1986) pp. 289338.Google Scholar
12.Kuipers, B., “Common-sense reasoning about causality: deriving structure from behaviourAl-24 (1984) pp. 169–.Google Scholar
13.Nielsen, P., “Qualitative Statics of Rigid bodies” Technical Report, TR-UIUCDCS-R-87–1354 (University of Illinois, 1988).Google Scholar
14.Joskowicz, L., “Shape and Function in Mechanical DevicesAAAI (1988) pp. 347352.Google Scholar
15.Li, Z., Canny, J.F. and Sastry, S., “On Motion Planning for Dexterous Manipulation, Part-1: The Problem Formulation Procs. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf on Robotics and Automation (1989) pp. 775780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Fearing, R.S., “Simplified Grasping and Manipulation with Dexterous Robot Hands”, IEEE.J. Robotics & Automation 2, 4, 188195 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Salisbury, J.K. and Craig, J.I., “Articulated hands-Force Control and Kinematic Issues”, int. J. Robotics Research 1, No 1, 417 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Yoshikawa, T., “Manipulability of Robot MechanismsInt. J. Robotics Research 4, No. 2, 39 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kerr, J.R., “An Analysis of Multi-fingered HandsPh.D dissertation (Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Stanford University, 1984).Google Scholar
20.Mason, M.J. and Salisbury, J.K., “Robot Hands & the Mechanics of Manipulation” (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar
21.Li, Z. and Sastry, S., “Dexterous Robot Hands: Several Important IssuesIEEE 1988 Workshop in Grasping and Manipulation (04, 1988) pp. 3339.Google Scholar
22.Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Goldenberg, A.A.Mylopoulos, and.J., “Qualitative Static Analysis of a Two-Fingered Planar GraspProcs. CSME Forum, July 90, Toronto. (1990) pp. 5360.Google Scholar
23.Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Goldenberg, A.A.Mylopoulos, and.J., “Qualitative Theory of Grasping - A Formalised Approach to Intuitive Robot GraspingProcs. of the Int. Symp. on Intelligent Control, Philadelphia (1990) pp. 364369.Google Scholar
24.Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Goldenberg, A.A.Mylopoulos, and.J., “Qualitative Modelling and Reasoning In Dexterous Robot Grasping and ManipulationInternal Report (Robotics and Automation Laboratory, University of Toronto, 01., 91).Google Scholar
25.Nii, H. Penny, “Blackboard Systems: The Blackboard Model of Problem Solving and the Evolution of Blackboard ArchitecturesAl Magazine 38–53 (08., 1986).Google Scholar
26.Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Goldenberg, A.A. and Mylopoulos, J., “A Blackboard Architecture for Synthesis of Dexterous Manipulation30th CDC, Brighton, UK, 1991) pp. 10711.Google Scholar
27.Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Gershon, D., Goldenberg, A.A. and Mylopoulos, J., “Introducing Robotic Common-Sense in Real Time of Dexterous ManipulationIEEE Int Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France (05, 1992) pp. 27762781.Google Scholar