Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:00:38.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precision Grasp Planning for Multi-Finger Hand to Grasp Unknown Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2019

Wenyu Yan ,
Zhen Deng ,
Jinbao Chen ,
Hong Nie  and
Jianwei Zhang
Wenyu Yan*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Zhen Deng
Affiliation:
TAMs, Department of Informatics, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Jinbao Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Hong Nie
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Jianwei Zhang
Affiliation:
TAMs, Department of Informatics, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Determining an appropriate grasp configuration for multi-finger grasping is difficult due to the complexity of robotic hands. The multi-finger grasp planning should consider not only geometry constraints of objects but also kinematics and dynamics of robotic hand. In this paper, a precision grasp-planning framework is presented for multi-finger hand to grasp unknown objects. First, the manipulation capabilities of the robotic hand are analyzed. The analysis results are further used as bases for the precision grasp planning. Second, the superquadric (SQ) fitting method is used for approximating unknown object models. Finally, a local–global optimization method is implemented to find appropriate grasp configurations for dexterous hand. The presented planning framework is validated in simulation experiments. Simulation results demonstrated that the presented grasp-planning framework enables the multi-finger hand to grasp unknown objects effectively.

Keywords

Grasp PlanningRobotic handsPose Estimation and RegistrationOptimization Robot Kinematics
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 37 , Issue 8 , August 2019 , pp. 1415 - 1437
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cutkosky, M. R., “On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5(3), 269–279 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahrenkamp, N., Westkamp, L., Yamanobe, N., Aksoy, E. E. and Asfour, T., “Part-Based Grasp Planning for Familiar Objects,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Cancun, Mexico (2016), pp. 919–925.Google Scholar
Song, P., Fu, Z. and Liu, L., “Grasp planning via hand-object geometric fitting,” Vis. Comput. 3(4), 1–16 (2016).Google Scholar
Ciocarlie, M. T. and Allen, P. K., “Hand posture subspaces for dexterous robotic grasping,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 28(7), 851–867 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunis, H. A., Rimon, E. D., Golan, Y. and Shapiro, A., “Caging polygonal objects using equilateral three-finger hands,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2(3), 1672–1679 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hang, K., Li, M., Stork, J. A., Bekiroglu, Y., Pokorny, F. T., Billard, A. and Kragic, D., “Hierarchical fingertip space: A unified framework for grasp planning and in-hand grasp adaptation,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 32(4), 960–972 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osa, T., Peters, J. and Neumann, G., “Experiments with Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning of Multiple Grasping Policies,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Roppongi, Tokyo (2016), pp. 160–172.Google Scholar
Jaklic, A., Leonardis, A. and Solina, F., “Segmentation and recovery of superquadrics,” Comput. Imaging Vis. 20 (2000).Google Scholar
Chevalier, L., Nautibus, B., Jaillet, F. and Baskurt, A., “Segmentation and superquadric modeling of 3D Objects,” J. WSCG 11(1) (2003).Google Scholar
Duncan, K., Sarkar, S., Alqasemi, R. and Dubey, R., “Multi-Scale Superquadric Fitting for Efficient Shape and Pose Recovery of Unknown Objects,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany (2013), pp. 4238–4243.Google Scholar
Bohg, J., Morales, A., Asfour, T. and Kragic, D., “Data-driven grasp synthesis: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30(2), 289–309 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahbani, A., El-Khoury, S. and Bidaud, P., “An overview of 3D object grasp synthesis algorithms,” Robot. Autonom. Sys. 60(3), 326–336 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gori, I., Pattacini, U., Tikhanoff, V. and Metta, G., “Ranking the Good Points: A Comprehensive Method for Humanoid Robots to Grasp Unknown Objects,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Sydney, Australia (2013), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Marton, Z. C., Goron, L., Rusu, R. B. and Beetz, M., “Reconstruction and verification of 3d object models for grasping,” Robotics Research. Springer (2011), pp. 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blodow, N., Rusu, R. B., Marton, Z. C. and Beetz, M., “Partial View Modeling and Validation in 3D Laser Scans for Grasping,” Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Paris, France (2009), pp. 459–464.Google Scholar
Vezzani, G., Pattacini, U. and Natale, L., “A Grasping Approach Based on Superquadric Models,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Singapore (2017), pp. 1579–1586.Google Scholar
Makhal, A., Thomas, F. and Gracia, A. P., “Grasping Unknown Objects in Clutter by Superquadric Representation,” 2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC), Laguna Hills, CA, USA (2018) pp. 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfeder, C., Allen, P. K., Lackner, C. and Pelossof, R., “Grasp Planning via Decomposition Trees,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy (2007), pp. 4679–4684.Google Scholar
Ferrari, C. and Canny, J., “Planning Optimal Grasps,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France (1992), pp. 2290–2295.Google Scholar
Pokorny, F. T. and Kragic, D., “Classical Grasp Quality Evaluation: New Algorithms and Theory,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan (2013), pp. 3493–3500.Google Scholar
Roa, M. A. and Suarez, R., “Computation of independent contact regions for grasping 3D objects,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25(4), 839–850 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roa, M. A., Chen, Z., Staal, I. C., Muirhead, J. N. and Maier, A., “Toward a Functional Evaluation of Maniplation Performance in Dexterous Robotics Hand Design.” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China (2014), pp. 6800–6807.Google Scholar
Yan, W., Nie, H., Chen, J. and Han, D., “Optimal design and grasp ability evaluation of four-finger tendon-driven hand,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 14(6), (2017). doi: 10.1177/1729881417748444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solina, F. and Bajcsy, R., “Recovery of parametric models from range images: The case for superquadrics with global deformations,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. 12(2), 131–147 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calli, B., Walsman, A., Singh, A., Srinivasa, S., Abbeel, P. and Dollar, A. M., “Benchmarking in manipulation research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley object and model set,” IEEE Robot. Automat. Mag. 22(3), 36–52 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar