Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:47:46.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel Robust Model Reference Adaptive Impedance Control Scheme for an Active Transtibial Prosthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2019

Siamak Heidarzadeh
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Tehran, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Mojtaba Sharifi
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Tehran, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Hassan Salarieh*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Tehran, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Aria Alasty
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Tehran, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In this paper, a novel robust model reference adaptive impedance control (RMRAIC) scheme is presented for an active transtibial ankle prosthesis. The controller makes the closed loop dynamics of the prosthesis similar to a reference impedance model and provides asymptotic tracking of the response trajectory of this impedance model. The interactions between human and prosthesis are taken into account by designing a second-order reference impedance model. The proposed controller is robust against parametric uncertainties in the nonlinear dynamic model of the prosthesis. Also, the controller has robustness against bounded uncertainties due to unavailable ground reaction forces and unmeasurable feedbacks of accelerations at the socket place. Moreover, an appropriate Series Elastic Actuator (SEA) mechanism for the prosthetic ankle is included in this work and its effects are discussed. Tracking performance and stability of the closed-loop system are proven via the Lyapunov stability analysis. Using simulations on an overall amputee prosthetic foot system, the effectiveness of the proposed RMRAIC controller is investigated for the task of level ground walking.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rice, J. J., Schimmels, J. M. and Huang, S., “Design and evaluation of a passive ankle prosthesis with powered push-off,J. Mech. Rob. 8, 021012 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. H. and Kuo, A. D., “Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking,PLoS one 5, e9307 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateni, H. and Olney, S. J., “Kinematic and kinetic variations of below-knee amputee gait,JPO 14, 210 (2002).Google Scholar
Colborne, G. R., Naumann, S., Longmuir, P. E. and Berbrayer, D., “Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees: A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet,Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 272278 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molen, N., “Energy/speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 31, 173185 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, S. K.-W., Powered ankle-foot prosthesis for the improvement of amputee walking economy. Ph.D. Dissertation (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007).Google Scholar
Bellman, R. D., Holgate, M. A. and Sugar, T. G., “SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics,” 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, AZ, USA (2008) pp. 511516.Google Scholar
Sup, F., Bohara, A. and Goldfarb, M., “Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis,Int. J. Rob. Res. 27, 263273 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, R., Sawada, T., Kobayashi, N. and Hofer, E. P., “Control method for powered ankle prosthesis via internal model control design,” 2011 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), IEEE, Beijing, China (2011) pp. 237242.Google Scholar
Versluys, R., Desomer, A., Lenaerts, G.,Van Damme, M., Beyl, P., Van der Perre, G., Peeraer, L. and Lefeber, D., “A pneumatically powered below-knee prosthesis: Design specifications and first experiments with an amputee,” 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2008, BioRob 2008, IEEE, Scottsdale, AZ, USA (2008) pp. 372377.Google Scholar
Hitt, J. K., Bellman, R., Holgate, M., Sugar, T. G. and Hollander, K. W., “The sparky (spring ankle with regenerative kinetics) project: Design and analysis of a robotic transtibial prosthesis with regenerative kinetics,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA (2007) pp. 15871596.Google Scholar
Au, S. K., Weber, J. and Herr, H., “Biomechanical design of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis,” IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, Netherlands (2007) pp. 298303.Google Scholar
Caputo, J. M. and Collins, S. H., “A universal ankle-foot prosthesis emulator for human locomotion experiments,J. Biomech. Eng. 136, 035002 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, D. H., Characterizing Ankle Function During Stair Ascent, Descent, and Level Walking for Ankle Prosthesis and Orthosis Design (University of Boston, 2004).Google Scholar
Palmer, M. L., Sagittal Plane Characterization of Normal Human Ankle Function Across a Range of Walking Gait Speeds (MIT, 2002).Google Scholar
Klute, G., Czerniecki, J. and Hannaford, B., “Development of powered prosthetic lower limb,” Proceedings of the 1st National Meeting, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service,Washington, DC, USA (1998).Google Scholar
Au, S. K., Weber, J. and Herr, H., “Powered Ankle–Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy,IEEE Trans. Rob. 25, 5166 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. W., Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-loop Actuator Force Control (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000).Google Scholar
Williamson, M. M., Series Elastic Actuators, A. I. Technical Report, No. 1524 (1995).Google Scholar
Holgate, M. A., Sugar, T. G. and Bohler, A. W., “A novel control algorithm for wearable robotics using phase plane invariants,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA’09, Kobe, Japan (2009) pp. 38453850.Google Scholar
Hollander, K. W., Ilg, R., Sugar, T. G. and Herring, D., “An efficient robotic tendon for gait assistance,J. Biomech. Eng. 128, 788791 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, K., Zhu, J., Wang, Q. and Wang, L., “Finite-state control of powered below-knee prosthesis with ankle and toe,IFAC Proc. 44, 28652870 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., Wang, Q. and Wang, L., “PANTOE 1: Biomechanical design of powered ankle-foot prosthesis with compliant joints and segmented foot,” 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Montreal, ON, Canada (2010) pp. 3136.Google Scholar
Pratt, G. A. and Williamson, M. M., “Series elastic actuators,” Intelligent Robots and Systems 95.’Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots’, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, vol. 1 (1995) pp. 399406.Google Scholar
Hogan, N., “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation,J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107, 17 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaya, J. A. and Herr, H., “Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait,IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 12, 2431 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mai, A. and Commuri, S., “Intelligent control of a prosthetic ankle joint using gait recognition,Control Eng. Pract. 49, 113 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimi, V., Fakoorian, S. A., Nguyen, T. T. and Simon, D., “Robust adaptive impedance control with application to a transfemoral prosthesis and test robot,J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 140, 121002 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotine, J.-J. E. and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991).Google Scholar
Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S. and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Modeling and Control (Wiley, New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Sadedel, M., Yousefi-Koma, A., Khadiv, M. and Mansouri, S., “Investigation on dynamic modeling of SURENA III humanoid robot with heel-off and heel-strike motions,Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng. 41, 923 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashemzadeh, F. and Tavakoli, M., “Position and force tracking in nonlinear teleoperation systems under varying delays,Robotica 33, 10031016 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T., Jiang, L., Fan, S., Wu, X. and Feng, W., “Development and experimental evaluation of multifingered robot hand with adaptive impedance control for unknown environment grasping,Robotica 34, 11681185 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimi, V., Simon, D. and Richter, H., “Stable robust adaptive impedance control of a prosthetic leg,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, ASME 2015, Columbus, Ohio, USA (2015) pp. V001T009A003–V001T009A003.Google Scholar
Sharifi, M., Behzadipour, S. and Salarieh, H., “Nonlinear bilateral adaptive impedance control with applications in telesurgery and telerehabilitation,J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 138, 111010 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimi, V., Shu, T., Zhao, H., Ambrose, E., Ames, A. D. and Simon, D., “Robust control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis device with experimental verification,” American Control Conference (ACC), 2017, IEEE, Seattle, WA, USA (2017) pp. 517522.Google Scholar
Azimi, V., Simon, D., Richter, H. and Fakoorian, S. A., “Robust composite adaptive transfemoral prosthesis control with non-scalar boundary layer trajectories,” American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, IEEE (2016) pp. 30023007.Google Scholar
Sharifi, M., Behzadipour, S., Salarieh, H. and Tavakoli, M., “Cooperative modalities in robotic telerehabilitation using nonlinear bilateral impedance control,Control Eng. Pract. 67, 5263 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifi, M., Behzadipour, S. and Vossoughi, G., “Model reference adaptive impedance control of rehabilitation robots in operational space,”4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), IEEE, Rome, Italy (2012) pp. 16981703.Google Scholar
Sharifi, M., Salarieh, H., Behzadipour, S. and Tavakoli, M., “Tele-echography of moving organs using an impedance-controlled telerobotic system,Mechatronics 45, 6070 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafi, M., Sharifi, M., Adams, K. and Tavakoli, M., “Robotic assistance for children with cerebral palsy based on learning from tele-cooperative demonstration,Int. J. Intell. Rob. Appl. 1, 4354 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtyra, M., “Multibody simulation model of human walking,Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. Int. J. 31(3), 357377 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westervelt, E. R., Grizzle, J. W., Chevallereau, C., Choi, J. H. and Morris, B., Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007).Google Scholar
Winter, D. A., Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotine, J.-J. and Coetsee, J., “Adaptive sliding controller synthesis for non-linear systems,Int. J. Control 43, 16311651 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimi, V., Nguyen, T. T., Sharifi, M., Fakoorian, S. A. and Simon, D., “Robust ground reaction force estimation and control of lower-limb prostheses: Theory and simulation,IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 99, 112 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narendra, K. S. and Annaswamy, A. M., Stable Adaptive Systems (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2012).Google Scholar
Peasgood, M., Kubica, E. and McPhee, J., “Stabilization of a dynamic walking gait simulation,J Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2, 6572 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar