Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:38:05.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A novel five-degrees-of-freedom decoupled robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Jaime Gallardo-Alvarado ,
Horacio Orozco-Mendoza  and
José M. Rico-Martínez
Jaime Gallardo-Alvarado*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Av. Tecnológico y A. García Cubas, 38010 Celaya, GTO, México
Horacio Orozco-Mendoza
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Av. Tecnológico y A. García Cubas, 38010 Celaya, GTO, México
José M. Rico-Martínez
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, FIMEE, Universidad de Guanajuato, Salamanca – Valle de Santiago km 3.5 Salamanca, GTO, México
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this work a new nonoverconstrained redundant decoupled robot, free of compound joints, formed from three parallel manipulators, with two moving platforms and provided with six active limbs connected to the fixed platform, called LinceJJP, is presented. Interesting applications such as multi-axis machine tools with parallel kinematic architectures, solar panels, radar antennas, and telescopes are available for this novel spatial mechanism.

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , October 2010 , pp. 909 - 917
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gough, V. E., “Contribution to Discussion to Papers on Research in Automobile Stability and Control and in Type Performance,” Proceedings Automation Division Institution of Mechanical Engineers (1957) pp. 392–395.Google Scholar
2.Gough, V. E. and Whitehall, S. G., “Universal Tyre Testing Machine,” Proceedings of the FISITA Ninth International Technical Congress, IMechE 1, London, UK (1962) pp. 117–137.Google Scholar
3.Stewart, D., “A platform with six degrees of freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. I 180 (15), 371–386 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Clavel, R., Conception d'un robot parallle rapide 4 degrs de libert Ph.D. Thesis (Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL, 1991).Google Scholar
5.Clavel, R., “Device for the movement and positioning of an element in space,” US Patent No. 4,976,582 (Dec. 11, 1990).Google Scholar
6.Hunt, K. H. and Primrose, E. J. F., “Assembly configurations of some in-parallel-actuated manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 28 (1), 31–42 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Zlatanov, D., Dai, M. Q., Fenton, E. G. and Benhabib, B., “Mechanical design and kinematic analysis of a three-legged six degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator,” Proc. ASME Robot. Spatial Mech. Mech. Syst. Conf. 45, 529–36 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Gallardo-Alvarado, J., Alici, G., Pérez-González, L., “A new family of constrained redundant parallel manipulators,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., (Sep. 30, 2009), doi:10.1007/s11044-009-9174-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gao, F., Peng, B., Li, W. and Zhao, H., “Design of a novel 5-DOF fully parallel kinematic machine tool based on workspace,” Robotica 23 (1), 35–43 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gao, F., Peng, B., Zhao, H. and Li, W., “A novel 5-DOF fully parallel kinematic machine tool,” Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Tech. 31 (1–2), 201–207 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gallardo-Alvarado, J., Rico-Martínez, J. M. and Alici, G., “Kinematics and singularity analyses of a 4-dof parallel manipulator using screw theory,” Mech. Mach. Theory 41 (9), 1048–1061 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Gallardo-Alvarado, J., Orozco-Mendoza, H. and Maeda-Sánchez, A., “Acceleration and singularity analyses of a parallel manipulator with a particular topology,” Meccanica 42 (3), 223–238 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Gallardo, J., Rodríguez, R., Caudillo, M. and Rico, J. M., “A family of spherical parallel manipulators with two legs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43 (2), 201–216 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Innocenti, C. and Wenger, P., “Position Analysis of the RRP-3(SS) Multiloop Spatial Structure,” Proceedings of DETC'04 ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, UT (2004) paper DETC2004-57382 CD-ROM format.Google Scholar
15.Carbone, G. and Ceccarelli, M., “A serial–parallel robotic architecture for surgical tasks,” Robotica 23 (03), 345–354 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Carbone, G. and Ceccarelli, M., “A stiffness analysis for a hybrid parallel-serial manipulator,” Robotica 22 (5), 567–576 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tanev, T. K., “Kinematics of a hybrid (parallel–serial) robot manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 35 (9), 1183–1196 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zheng, X. Z., Bin, H. Z. and Luo, Y. G., “Kinematic analysis of a hybrid serial–parallel manipulator,” Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Tech. 23 (11–12), 925–930 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Gallardo-Alvarado, J., “Kinematics of a hybrid manipulator by means of screw theory,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 14 (3–4), 345–366 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lu, Y. and Leinonen, T., “Solution and simulation of position-orientation for multi-spatial 3-RPS parallel mechanisms in series connection,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 14 (1), 47–60 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Lu, Y. and Hu, B., “Solving driving forces of 2(3-SPR) serial–parallel manipulator by CAD variation geometry approach,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 128 (6), 1349–1351 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Brodsky, V., Glozman, D. and Shoham, M., “Double Circular-Triangular Six Degrees-of-Freedom Parallel Robot,” Sixth International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Salzburg, Austria (1998) pp. 155–164.Google Scholar
23.Austad, A., “Arm device,” IPN number WO 87,03239 (Jun. 4, 1987).Google Scholar
24.Raghavan, M., “The Stewart platform of general geometry has 40 configurations,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 115 (2), 277–282 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Innocenti, C., “Forward Kinematics in Polynomial Form of the General Stewart Platform,” Proceedings ASME 25th Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Atlanta, GA (1998) pp. 1–10. CD-ROM Paper DETC98/MECH-5894.Google Scholar
26.Rolland, L., “Certified solving of the forward kinematics problem with an exact algebraic method for the general parallel manipulator,” Adv. Robot. 19 (9), 995–1025 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Chen, S. L. and You, I. T., “Kinematic and singularity analyses of a six DOF 6-3-3 parallel link machine tool,” Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Tech. 16 (11), 835–842 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Hunt, K. H., “Structural kinematics of in-parallel actuated robot arms,” ASME J. Mech. Transm. Auto. Des. 105 (4), 705–712 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Innocenti, C. and Parenti-Castelli, V., “Direct position analysis of the Stewart platform mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory 25 (6), 611–621 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Pettinato, J. S. and Stephanou, H. E., “Manipulability and Stability of a Tentacle Based Robot Manipulator,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ (1989) pp. 458–63.Google Scholar
31.Paljug, E., Ohm, T. and Hayati, S., “The JPL Serpentine Robot: A 12-DOF System for Inspection,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan (1995) pp. 3143–3148.Google Scholar
32.Chirikjian, G., Pamecha, A. and Ebert-Uphoff, I., “Evaluating efficiency of self-reconfiguration in a class of modular robots,” J. Robot. Syst. 13 (5), 317–338 (1996).3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Kyriakopoulos, K. J., Migadis, G. and Sarrigeorgidis, K., “The NTUA snake: Design, planar kinematics, and motion planning,” J. Robot. Syst. 16 (1), 37–72 (1999).3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Hanan, M. W. and Walker, I. A., “Kinematics and the implementation of an elephant's trunk manipulator and other continuum style robots,” J. Robot. Syst. 20 (2), 45–63 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Yanming, L., Peisun, M., Changjun, Q., Xueguan, G., Jianbin, W. and Haihong, Z., “Design and study of a novel hyper-redundant manipulator,” Robotica 21 (5), 505–509 (2003).Google Scholar
36.Merlet, J.-P., website http://www-sop.inria.fr/coprin/equipe/merlet/merlet-eng.htmlGoogle Scholar
37.Bonev, I., website http://www.parallemic.org/Google Scholar
38.Di Gregorio, R., “A New Decoupled Parallel Manipulator.” Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Robotics in Alpa-Adria-Danube Region, RAAD 2001, Vienna, Austria (2001) pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
39.Gogu, G., “Mobility of mechanisms: a critical review,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40 (9), 1068–1097 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Hunt, K. H., “Structural kinematics of in-parallel-actuated robot arms,” ASME J. Mech. Transm. Auto. Des. 105, 705–712 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Huang, Z. and Fang, Y. F., “Kinematic characteristics analysis of 3 DOF in-parallel actuated pyramid mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory 31 (8), 1009–1018 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Huang, Z. and Wang, J., “Instantaneous Motion Analysis of Deficient-Rank 3-DOF Parallel Manipulator by Means of Principal Screws,” Proceedings of A Symposium Commemorating the Legacy, Works, and Life of Sir Robert Stawell Ball Upon the 100th Anniversary of a Treatise on the Theory of Screws, University of Cambridge, Trinity College, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK (2000) pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
43.Huang, Z. and Wang, J., “Identification of principal screws of 3-DOF parallel manipulators by quadric degeneration,” Mech. Mach. Theory 36 (8), 893–911 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Huang, Z., Wang, J. and Fang, Y., “Analysis of instantaneous motions of deficient-rank 3- RPS parallel manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 37 (2), 229–240 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Dai, J. S., Huang, Z. and Lipkin, H., “Mobility of overconstrained parallel mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 128 (1), 220–229 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Tsai, L.-W., Robot Analysis (John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999).Google Scholar
47.Gallardo, J., Orozco, H., Rodríguez, R. and Rico, J. M., “Kinematics of a class of parallel manipulators which generates structures with three limbs,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 17 (1), 27–46 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Gallardo-Alvarado, J., Aguilar-Nájera, C. R., Casique-Rosas, L., Pérez-González, L. and Rico-Martínez, J. M., “Solving the kinematics and dynamics of a modular spatial hyper-redundant manipulator by means of screw theory,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20 (4), 307–325 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Rico, J. M. and Duffy, J., “An application of screw algebra to the acceleration analysis of serial chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 31 (4), 445–457 (1996).Google Scholar
50.Rico, J. M., Gallardo, J. and Duffy, J., “Screw theory and higher order kinematic analysis of open serial and closed chains,” Mech. Mach. Theory 34 (4), 559–586 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.Rico, J. M. and Duffy, J., “Forward and inverse accceleration analyses of in-parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 122 (3), 299–303 (2000).Google Scholar
52.Gallardo, J., Rico, J. M., Frisoli, A., Checcacci, D. and Bergamasco, M., “Dynamics of parallel manipulators by means of screw theory,” Mech. Mach. Theory 38 (11), 1113–1131 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Gallardo-Alvarado, J. and Rico-Martínez, J. M., “Jerk influence coefficients, via screw theory, of closed chains,” Meccanica 36 (2), 213–228 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Gosselin, C. M. and Angeles, J., “The optimum kinematic design of a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator,” ASME J. Mech. Transm. Auto. Des. 111 (2), 202–207 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar