Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:48:46.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new stabilizing solution for motion planning and control of multiple robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Avinesh Prasad ,
Bibhya Sharma  and
Jito Vanualailai
Avinesh Prasad
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Information & Mathematical Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Suva, FIJI
Bibhya Sharma*
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Information & Mathematical Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Suva, FIJI
Jito Vanualailai
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Information & Mathematical Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Suva, FIJI
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper formulates a new scalable algorithm for motion planning and control of multiple point-mass robots. These autonomous robots are designated to move safely to their goals in a priori known workspace cluttered with fixed and moving obstacles of arbitrary positions and sizes. The control laws proposed for obstacle and collision avoidance and target convergence ensure that the equilibrium point of the given system is asymptotically stable. Computer simulations with the proposed technique and applications to a team of two planar (RP) manipulators working together in a common workspace are presented. Also, the robustness of the system in the presence of noise is verified through simulations.

Keywords

Point-mass robotsMotion planningPlanar robot armsAsymptotic stability
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 5: RAAD , May 2016 , pp. 1071 - 1089
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014

References

1.Sharma, B., New Directions in the Applications of the Lyapunov-based Control Scheme to the Findpath Problem Ph.D. Thesis (University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji Islands, July 2008). PhD Dissertation, http://www.staff.usp.ac.fj/~sharma_b/Bibhya_PhD.pdf.Google Scholar
2.Sharma, B., Vanualailai, J. and Singh, S., “Tunnel passing maneuvers of prescribed formations,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Burgard, W., Moors, M., Stachniss, C. and Schneider, F. E., “Coordinated multi-robot exploration,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 21 (3), 376–386 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hu, H., Tsui, P. W., Cragg, L. and Völker, N., “Architecture for multi-robot cooperation over the internet,” Int. J. Integr Comput.-Aided Eng. 11 (3), 213–226 (2004).Google Scholar
5.Yamaguchi, H., “A distributed motion coordination strategy for multiple nonholonomic mobile robots in cooperative hunting operations,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 43 (4), 257–282 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Arrichiello, F., Coordination Control of Multiple Mobile Robots Ph.D. Thesis (Universita Degli Studi Di Cassino, Cassino, Italy, November 2006). PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
7.Dawson, D. M., Zergeroglu, E., Dixon, W. E. and Zhang, F., “Robust tracking and regulation control for mobile robots,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 10 (4), 199–216 (2000).Google Scholar
8.Rimon, E., “Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8 (5), 501–517 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Tanner, H. G., Loizou, S. and Kyriakopoulos, K. J., “Nonholonomic navigation and control of cooperating mobile manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19 (3), 53–64 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Arkin, R. C., “Motor schema-based mobile robot navigation,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 8 (4), 92–112 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Adams, M. D., Hu, H. and Probert, P. J., “Towards a Real-Time Architecture for Obstacle Avoidance and Path Planning in Mobile Robots,” Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4 (1990).Google Scholar
12.Khosla, P. and Volpe, R., “Superquadric Artificial Potential for Obstacle Avoidance and Approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1988) pp. 1778–1784.Google Scholar
13.Vanualailai, J., Ha, J-H. and Sharma, B., “An asymptotically stable collision-avoidance system,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 43 (9), 925–932 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Sharma, B., Prasad, A. and Vanualailai, J., “A collision-free algorithm of a point-mass robot using neural networks,” J. Artif. Intell. 3 (1), 49–55 (2012).Google Scholar
15.Prasad, A., Sharma, B. and Vanualailai, J., “Motion planning and control of autonomous robots in a two-dimensional plane,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 6 (12), 1163–1168 (2012).Google Scholar