Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:48:39.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling and Analysis of the Multiple Dynamic Coupling Effects of a Dual-arm Space Robotic System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2020

Jianqing Peng Open the ORCID record for Jianqing Peng [Opens in a new window] ,
Wenfu Xu ,
Zhonghua Hu ,
Bin Liang  and
Aiguo Wu
Jianqing Peng
Affiliation:
The School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150001, China. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Wenfu Xu*
Affiliation:
The School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150001, China. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Zhonghua Hu
Affiliation:
The School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150001, China. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Bin Liang
Affiliation:
Department of Automation, School of Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, China. Email: [email protected]
Aiguo Wu
Affiliation:
The School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin150001, China. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A dual-arm space robot has large potentials in on-orbit servicing. However, there exist multiple dynamic coupling effects between the two arms, each arm, and the base, bringing great challenges to the trajectory planning and dynamic control of the dual-arm space robotic system. In this paper, we propose a dynamic coupling modeling and analysis method for a dual-arm space robot. Firstly, according to the conservation principle of the linear and angular momentum, the dynamic coupling between the base and each manipulator is deduced. The dynamic coupling factor is then defined to evaluate the dynamic coupling degree. Secondly, the dynamic coupling equations between the two arms, each arm, and the base are deduced, respectively. The dynamic coupling factor is suitable not only for single-arm space robots but also for multi-arm space robot systems. Finally, the multiple coupling effects of the dual-arm space robotic system are analyzed in detail through typical cases. Simulation results verified the proposed method.

Keywords

Dual-arm space robotOn-orbit servicingTrajectory planningDynamic coupling factorMultiple dynamic coupling effects
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 38 , Issue 11 , November 2020 , pp. 2060 - 2079
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Oda, M., “Space Robot Experiments on NASDA’s ETS-VII Satellite-Preliminary Overview of the Experiment Results,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, USA (1999) pp. 1390–1395.Google Scholar
Shan, M., Guo, J. and Gill, E., “Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods,” Prog. Aerosp Sci. 80, 18–32 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Abad, A., Ma, O., Pham, K. and Ulrich, S., “A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 68, 1–26 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenchev, D., Umetani, Y. and Yoshida, K., “Analysis of a redundant free-flying spacecraft/manipulator system,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 8(1), 1–6 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, P., Zhang, F., Meng, Z. and Liu, Z., “Adaptive control for space debris removal with uncertain kinematics, dynamics and states,” Acta Astronaut. 128(11–12), 416–430 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleshill, E., Oshinowo, L., Rembala, R., Bina, B., Rey, D. and Sindelar, S., “Dextre: Improving maintenance operations on the International Space Station,” Acta Astronaut. 64(9), 869–874 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, P., Zhang, F., Cai, J., Wang, D., Meng, Z. and Guo, J., “Dexterous tethered space robot: Design, measurement, control and experiment,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 53(3), 1452–1468 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, F. and Huang, P., “Releasing dynamics and stability control of maneuverable tethered space net,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22(2), 983–993 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanos, K. and Papadopoulos, E., “On Cartesian Motions with Singularities Avoidance for Free-Floating Space Robots,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA (2012) vol. 20, pp. 5398–5403.Google Scholar
Nanos, K. and Papadopoulos, E., “Avoiding dynamic singularities in Cartesian motions of free-floating manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 51(3), 2305–2318 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Shum, H.Y., Kanade, T. and Lee, J., “Parameterization and adaptive control of space robot systems,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 30(2), 435–451 (1994).Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Xie, Y., “Prediction error based adaptive Jacobian tracking for free-floating space manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 48(4), 3207–3221 (2012).Google Scholar
Xu, W., Li, C., Wang, X., Liang, B., Liu, Y. and Xu, Y., “Study on non-holonomic cartesian path planning of free-floating space robotic system,” Adv. Rob. 23(1–2), 113–143 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Liu, Y., Liang, B., Wang, X. and Xu, Y., “Unified multi-domain modeling and simulation of space robot for capturing a moving target,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 23(3), 293–331 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. and Shum, H., “Dynamic control and coupling of a free-flying space robot system,” J. Rob. Syst. 11(7), 573–589 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergerman, M., Lee, C. and Xu, Y., “Dynamic Coupling of Underactuated Manipulators,” 4th IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Albany, NY, USA (1995) pp. 500–505.Google Scholar
Ali, S., Moosavian, A. and Papadopoulos, E., “On the kinematics of multiple manipulator space free-flyers and their computation,” J. Rob. Syst. 15(4), 1–19 (1998).Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E., Ali, S. and Moosavian, A., “Dynamics and control of space free-flyers with multiple manipulators,” Adv. Rob. 9(6), 603–624 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, S., Moosavian, A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Explicit dynamics of space free-flyers with multiple manipulators via SPACEMAPLE,” Adv. Rob. 18(2), 223–244 (2004).Google Scholar
Hafez, A. A., Anurag, V. V., Shah, S. V., Krishna, K. M. and Jawahar, C. V., “Reactionless visual servoing of a dual-arm space robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China (2014) pp. 4475–4480.Google Scholar
Hafez, A. A., Mithun, P., Anurag, V., Shah, S. and Krishna, K. M., “Reactionless visual servoing of a multi-arm space robot combined with other manipulation tasks,” Rob. Auton. Syst. 91, 1–10 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Luo, J., Yuan, J. and Walter, U., “Coordinated trajectory planning of dual-arm space robot using constrained particle swarm optimization,” Acta Astron. 146, 259–272 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., Xu, W., Pan, E., Yan, L., Liang, B. and Wu, A., “Dual-arm coordinated capturing of an unknown tumbling target based on efficient parameters estimation,” Acta Astron. 162, 589–607 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S. V., Sharf, I. and Misra, A. K., “Reactionless Path Planning Strategies for Capture of Tumbling Objects in Space Using a Dual-Arm Robotic System,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation & Control, Boston, MA, USA (2013) pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Huang, P., Xu, Y. and Liang, B., “Dynamic balance control of multi-arm free-floating space robots,” Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 2(2), 398–403 (2006).Google Scholar
Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S., “The kinematics and dynamics of space manipulators: The virtual manipulator approach,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 9(4), 3–21 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Peng, J., Liang, B. and Mu, Z., “Hybrid modeling and analysis method for dynamic coupling of space robots,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 52(1), 85–98 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., Xu, W., Wang, Z. and She, Y., “Dynamic Analysis of the Compounded System Formed by Dual-arm Space Robot and the Captured Target,” International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenzhen, China (2013) pp. 1532–1537.Google Scholar
Xu, W., Liu, Y. and Xu, Y., “The coordinated motion planning of a dual-arm space robot for target capturing,” Robotica 30(5), 755–771 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Liang, B., Li, C. and Xu, Y., “Autonomous rendezvous and robotic capturing of non-cooperative target in space,” Robotica 28(5), 705–718 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., Liang, B., Li, C., Liu, Y. and Xu, Y., “Autonomous target capturing of free-floating space robot: Theory and experiments,” Robotica 27(2), 425–445 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., Xu, W., Liang, B. and Wu, A., “Virtual stereo-vision measurement of non-cooperative space targets for a dual-arm space robot,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69(1), 1–13 (2019).Google Scholar
Xu, W., Meng, D., Liu, H., Wang, X. and Liang, B., “Singularity-free trajectory planning of free-floating multiarm space robots for keeping the base inertially stabilized,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 49(12), 1–13 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar