Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:07:49.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic study on a self-propelled bionic underwater robot with undulation and jet propulsion modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2018

Ou Xie ,
Qixin Zhu ,
Lin Shen  and
Kun Ren
Ou Xie*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, P.R. China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Qixin Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, P.R. China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Lin Shen
Affiliation:
Transmatic Precision Metal Forming (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215129, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected]
Kun Ren
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, P.R. China. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper proposed a novel type of bionic underwater robot (BUR). The undulation and jet propulsion modes on the self-propelled BUR were combined, and the kinematic characteristics of the two propulsion modes were thoroughly compared. First, the prototype and swimming strategy of the BUR were presented, and a dynamic model of the BUR was established based on several assumptions. Then, a central pattern generator (CPG) model allowing free adjustment of frequency and amplitude was employed to achieve the undulation propulsion of carangiform fish and the jet propulsion of jellyfish. Also, the kinematic characteristics of the two propulsion modes were investigated through experiments under different caudal fin actuation parameters. The experimental results indicate that the developed prototype can realize the undulation and jet propulsion by the means of the coordinated movement of the multi-caudal fins. By adjusting the CPG parameters, the BUR can switch the propulsion mode smoothly. Furthermore, the propulsion velocity of the BUR initially increased rapidly with the frequency and then slowed down when the frequency was greater than 0.8 Hz in both propulsion modes. The undulation propulsion velocity increased with the amplitude in the measurement ranges, however, the jet propulsion velocity initially increased quickly with the amplitude and then kept constant and even decreased when the amplitude was greater than 11 cm. Under the same caudal fin actuation parameters, the average velocity in undulation propulsion mode was higher than that in jet propulsion mode.

Keywords

Bionic underwater robot (BUR)undulation propulsion modejet propulsion modekinematics
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 1613 - 1626
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ryuh, Y. S., Yang, G. H. and Liu, J. D., “A school of robotic fish for mariculture monitoring in the sea coast,” J. Bionic Eng. 12, 37–46 (2015).Google Scholar
2. Sitorus, P. E., Nazaruddin, Y. Y. and Leksono, E. “Design and implementation of paired pectoral fins locomotion of labriform fish applied to a fish robot,” J. Bionic Eng. 6, 37–45 (2009).Google Scholar
3. Williams, S. B., Newman, P. M. and Rosenblatt, J., “Autonomous underwater navigation and control,” Robotica 19, 481–496 (2011).Google Scholar
4. Bandyopadhyay, P. R., “Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30, 109–139 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Lionel, L., “Underwater robots part I: Current systems andproblem pose,” In: Mobile Robotics Towards New Applications (Lazinica, A., ed.) (InTech Open, Austria/Germany, 2006) pp. 335–360.Google Scholar
6. Bandyopadhyay, P. R., Beal, D. N. and Menozzi, A., “Biorobotic insights into how animals swim,” J. Exp. Biol. 211, 206–214 (2008).Google Scholar
7. Tong, B. G. and Zhuang, L. X., “Hydrodynamic model for undulation swimming of fish and its application,” Chin. J. Nature 1, 1–7 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Wang, Z. L., Li, J. and Hang, G. R., “Mechanism of jet propulsion in aquatic life and its application to biomimetic jet propulsion vehicles,” Robot 31, 281–228 (2009).Google Scholar
9. Liu, J. D. and Hu, H. S., “Biological Inspiration: From carangiform fish to multi-joint robotic fish,” J. Bionic Eng. 7, 35–48 (2010).Google Scholar
10. Linden, P. F. and Turner, J. S., “‘Optimal’ vortex rings and aquatic propulsion mechanisms,” Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 647–653 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Lighthill, M. J., “Note on the swimming of slender fish,” J. Fluids Mech. 9, 305–317 (1960).Google Scholar
12. Anderson, E. J. and Demont, M. E., “The mechanics of locomotion in the squid Loligo pealei: Locomotory function and unsteady hydrodynamics of the jet and intramantle pressure,” J. Exp. Biol. 203, 2851–2863 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Kim, B., Park, S. G. and Huang, W. X., “Self-propelled heaving and pitching flexible fin in a quiescent flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 62, 273–281 (2016).Google Scholar
14. Xia, D., Chen, W. and Wu, Z. J., “Research on hydrodynamics of carangiform mode robotic fish swimming under self-propulsion,” J. Mech. Eng. 49, 54–61 (2013).Google Scholar
15. Jiang, H. S. and Grosenbaugh, M. A., “Numerical simulation of vortex ring formation ion the presence of background flow with implications for squid propulsion,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20, 103–123 (2006).Google Scholar
16. Chowdhury, A. R., Kumar, V. and Prasad, B., “Kinematic study and implementation of a bio-inspired robotic fish underwater vehicle in a Lighthill mathematical framework,” Robot. Biomim. 1, 1–16 (2014).Google Scholar
17. Salumae, T. and Kruusmaa, M., “A flexible fin with bio-inspired stiffness profile and geometry,” J. Bionic Eng. 8, 418–428 (2011).Google Scholar
18. Blevins, E. L. and Lauder, G. V., “Rajiform locomotion:Three-dimensional kinematics of the pectoral fin surface during swimming in the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon orbignyi,” J. Exp. Biol. 215, 3231–3241 (2012).Google Scholar
19. Heo, S., Wiguna, T. and Park, H. C., “Effect of an artificial caudal fin on the performance of a biomimetic fish robot propelled by piezoelectric actuators,” J. Bionic Eng. 4, 151–158 (2007).Google Scholar
20. Nguyen, P. L., Lee, B. R. and Ahn, K. K., “Thrust and swimming speed analysis of fish robot with non-uniform flexible tail,” J. Bionic Eng. 13, 73–83 (2016).Google Scholar
21. Kim, H. and Lee, J., “Design, swimming motion planning and implementation of a legged underwater robot (CALEB10: D.BeeBot) by biomimetic approach,” Ocean Eng. 130, 310–327 (2017).Google Scholar
22. Li, J., Guo, Y. L. and Wang, Z. L., “A bionic jellyfish robot propelled by bio-tentacle propulsors actuated by shape memory alloy wires,” J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 1, 104–110 (2014).Google Scholar
23. Ajallooeian, M., Ahmadabadi, M. N., Araabi, B. N. and Moradi, H., “Design, implementation and analysis of an alternation-based central pattern generator for multidimensional trajectory generation,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 60, 182–198 (2012).Google Scholar
24. Wu, X. and Ma, S. “Adaptive creeping locomotion of a CPG-controlled snake-like robot to environment change,” Auton. Robots 28, 283–294 (2010).Google Scholar
25. Zhou, C. and Low, K. H. “Design and locomotion control of a biomimetic underwater vehicle with fin propulsion,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 17, 25–35 (2012).Google Scholar
26. Yu, J., Wang, M., Tan, M. and Zhang, J. “Three-dimensional swimming,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 18, 47–58 (2011).Google Scholar
27. Bajcar, T. et al. “Kinematic properties of the jellyfish Aurelia sp,” Jellyfish Blooms. 2, 279–289 (2009).Google Scholar
28. Breder, C. M. “The locomotion of fishes,” Zoologica. 4, 159–297 (1926).Google Scholar
29. Webb, P. W. “Form and function in fish swimming,” Sci. Am. 25, 58–68 (1984).Google Scholar
30. Wu, Z. X., Yu, J. Z. and Su, Z. S., “Control and implementation of S-start for a multijoint biomimetic robotic fish,” Acta Autom. Sin. 39, 1915–1922 (2013).Google Scholar
31. Wang, M., Yu, J. Z. and Tan, M., “CPG-based multi-modal swimming control for robotic dolphin,” Acta Autom. Sin. 40, 1933–1941 (2014).Google Scholar
32. Curet, O. M., Patankar, N. A., Lauder, G. V. and MacIver, M. A. “Mechanical properties of a bio-inspired robotic knifefish with an undulatory propulsor,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 6, 1–9 (2011).Google Scholar
33. Ren, Q. Y., Xu, J. X. and Fan, L. P., “A GIM-Based biomimetic learning approach for motion generation of a multi-joint robotic fish,” J. Bionic Eng. 10, 423–433 (2013).Google Scholar
34. Gao, F., Wang, Z. L. and Wang, Y. K., “A prototype of a biomimetic mantle jet propeller inspired by cuttlefish actuated by SMA wires and a theoretical model for its jet thrust,” J. Bionic Eng. 11, 412–422 (2014).Google Scholar