Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:24:37.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometric modelling of bounded and frictional grasps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Y. L. Xiong ,
D. J. Sanger  and
D. R. Kerr
D. J. Sanger
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT (UK)
D. R. Kerr
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT (UK)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper, as an extension of an earlier paper, presents a geometrical representation and theoretical foundation of robot grasping that is affected by friction and by the magnitudes of normal contact forces. Grasp analysis and synthesis are based on the concepts of constraint cone (region), restraint cone and freedom cone in the force screw-space and location screw-space. In fact, the freedom cone is the aggregate of all the screws repelling and reciprocal to the grasp geometry (denoted by the restraint cone). Moreover, the constraint cone and the constraint region describe the effect of friction and the influence of the amplitudes of normal forces. The conditions of equilibrium grasp, stable grasp, form closure, force closure, and relative form closure are derived from the geometrical representation, and approaches are suggested for the design of adaptable fixtures, and for automatic grasp planning. It is shown that relative form closure is of great significance for frictional grasp, since it is possible to generate enough internal forces in the subspace spanned by the contacts and consequently produce corresponding friction forces in the reciprocal subspace.

Keywords

Geometric modellingBounded graspsFrictional graspsGrasp analysis or synthesis.
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 1993 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Xiong, Y.L., Sanger, D.J. and Kerr, D.R., The Geometric Modelling of Boundless Grasps Robotica 11, No. 1,19–26 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Salisbury, J.K. and Roth, B., Kinematic and Force Analysis of Articulated Mechanical Hands ASME J. Mechanical Design 105, 35–41 (1983).Google Scholar
3.Li, Z.X. and S.S., Sastry, Task-Oriented Optimal Grasping by Multi-fingered Robot Hands IEEE J. Robotics and Automation 4, 32–43 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lakshminarayana, K., Mechanics of Form Closure ASME Paper No 78-DET-32(1978).Google Scholar
5.Kerr, D.R. and Sanger, D.J., The Analysis of Kinematic Restraint Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, New Delhi, India 299–303 (1993).Google Scholar
6.Hunt, K.H., Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1989).Google Scholar
7.Ohwovoriole, M.S. and Roth, B., An Extension of Screw Theory ASME J. Mechanical Design 103, 725–735 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ngugen, V.D., Constructing Force-Closure Grasps Int. J. Robotics Research 7, No. 3, 1–16 (1988).Google Scholar
9.Xiong, Y.L., Sanger, D.J. and Kerr, D.R., Optimal Synthesis of Point Contact Restraint Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. 206, 95–103 (1992).Google Scholar
10.Kerr, D.R. and Sanger, D.J., Restraint Analysis of a Rigid Body Using Frictional Elastic Contacts ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 109, 450–454 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kerr, D.R. and Sanger, D.J., Grasping Using a Three-Fingered Gripper Proceedings of 26th Machine Tool Design and Research Conference,Manchester, UK123–126(1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Dai, J.S. and Kerr, D.R., Analysis and Synthesis of Frictionless Planar Grasping in an Image SpaceProc. 22nd. ASME Mechanisms Conf.,Scottsdale, Arizona, USA(1992) pp. 283–291.Google Scholar