Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:15:45.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discrete modular serpentine robotic tail: design, analysis and experimentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Wael Saab ,
William S. Rone  and
Pinhas Ben-Tzvi
Wael Saab
Affiliation:
Robotics and Mechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
William S. Rone
Affiliation:
Robotics and Mechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Pinhas Ben-Tzvi*
Affiliation:
Robotics and Mechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents the design, analysis and experimentation of a Discrete Modular Serpentine Tail (DMST). The mechanism is envisioned for use as a robotic tail integrated onto mobile legged robots to provide a means, separate from the legs, to aid stabilization and maneuvering for both static and dynamic applications. The DMST is a modular two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) articulated, under-actuated mechanism, inspired by continuum and serpentine robotic structures. It is constructed from rigid links with cylindrical contoured grooves that act as pulleys to route and maintain equal displacements in antagonistic cable pairs that are connected to a multi-diameter pulley. Spatial tail curvatures are produced by adding a roll-DOF to rotate the bending plane of the planar tail curvatures. Kinematic and dynamic models of the cable-driven mechanism are developed to analyze the impact of trajectory and design parameters on the loading profiles transferred through the tail base. Experiments using a prototype are performed to validate the forward kinematic and dynamic models, determine the mechanism's accuracy and repeatability, and measure the mechanism's ability to generate inertial loading.

Keywords

Mechanism designRobotic tailCable-driven robotKinematicsDynamicsSimulation
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 7 , July 2018 , pp. 994 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hickman, G. C., “The mammalian tail: A review of functions,” Mammal Rev. 9 (4), 143–157 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Proske, U., “Energy conservation by elastic storage in kangaroos,” Endeavour 4 (4), 148–153 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Howell, A. B., “Speed in animals, their specialization for running and leaping,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropology 3 (1), 109–110 (1944).Google Scholar
4. Benton, M. J., “Studying function and behavior in the fossil record,” PLoS Biol. 8 (3), e1000321 (2010).Google Scholar
5. Libby, T., Moore, T. Y., Chang-Siu, E., Li, D., Cohen, D. J., Jusufi, A. and Full, R. J., “Tail-assisted pitch control in lizards, robots and dinosaurs,” Nature 481 (7380), 181–184 (2012).Google Scholar
6. Jusufi, A., Kawano, D., Libby, T. and Full, R., “Righting and turning in mid-air using appendage inertia: Reptile tails, analytical models and bio-inspired robots,” Bioinspiration Biomimetics 5 (4), 045001 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Kajita, S. and Espiau, B., Springer Handbook of Robotics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 361–389.Google Scholar
8. Saab, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Design and Analysis of a Discrete Modular Serpentine Robotic Tail for Improved Performance of Mobile Robots,” International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (2016) p. V05AT07A061.Google Scholar
9. Rone, W. S. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Mechanics modeling of multisegment rod-driven continuum robots,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 6 (4), 041006 (2014).Google Scholar
10. Rone, W. S. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Continuum robot dynamics utilizing the principle of virtual power,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30 (1), 275–287 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Rone, W. S. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Dynamic modeling and simulation of a yaw-angle quadruped maneuvering with a planar robotic tail,” ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 138 (8), DS-15-1456 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Saab, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Maneuverability and Heading Control of a Quadruped Robot Utilizing Tail Dynamics,” Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (2017).Google Scholar
13. Saab, W., Rone, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Robotic Tails: A State of The Art Review,” Robotica (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rone, W., Saab, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Design, Modeling and Optimization of the Universal-Spatial Robotic Tail,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2017).Google Scholar
15. Kamidi, V., Saab, W. and Pinhas, B.-T., “Design and Analysis of a Novel Planar Robotic Leg for High-Speed Locomotion,” International Conference on Intelligent Robots (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Rone, W., Saab, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Design, Modeling, and Integration of the Universal-Spatial Robotic Tail,” J. Mech. Robot. (2018).Google Scholar
17. Saab, W., Rone, W., Kumar, A. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Design and Integration of a Novel Spatial Articulated Robotic Tail,” Trans. Mechatronics (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wertz, J. R., Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control (Springer Science & Business Media, Springer Netherlands, 2012).Google Scholar
19. Oates, G. C., Aircraft Propulsion Systems Technology and Design (Aiaa, Portland, OR, 1989).Google Scholar
20. Lee, S.-H. and Goswami, A., “Reaction Mass Pendulum (RMP): An Explicit Model for Centroidal Angular Momentum of Humanoid Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2007) pp. 4667–4672.Google Scholar
21. Carpenter, M. D. and Peck, M. A., “Reducing base reactions with gyroscopic actuation of space-robotic systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25 (6), 1262–1270 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Ge, S. and Cheng, H., “A Comparative Design of Satellite Attitude Control System with Reaction Wheel,” First NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (2006) pp. 359–364.Google Scholar
23. Machairas, K. and Papadopoulos, E., “On Quadruped Attitude Dynamics and Control Using Reaction Wheels and Tails,” European Control Conference (2015) pp. 753–758.Google Scholar
24. Liu, G.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Lin, H.-Y., Chen, S.-T. and Lin, P.-C., “A bio-inspired hopping kangaroo robot with an active tail,” J. Bionic Eng 11 (4), 541–555 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. He, G. and Geng, Z., “Exponentially stabilizing an one-legged hopping robot with non-SLIP model in flight phase,” Mechatronics 19 (3), 364–374 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Chang-Siu, E., Libby, T., Tomizuka, M. and Full, R. J., “A Lizard-Inspired Active Tail Enables Rapid Maneuvers and Dynamic Stabilization in a Terrestrial Robot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2011) pp. 1887–1894.Google Scholar
27. Patel, A. and Braae, M., “Rapid Acceleration and Braking: Inspirations from the Cheetah's Tail,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2014) pp. 793–799.Google Scholar
28. Kohut, N., Haldane, D., Zarrouk, D. and Fearing, R., “Effect of Inertial Tail on Yaw Rate of 45 Gram Legged Robot,” International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machinces (2012) pp. 157–164.Google Scholar
29. Patel, A. and Braae, M., “Rapid Turning at High-Speed: Inspirations from the Cheetah's Tail,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2013) pp. 5506–5511.Google Scholar
30. Kopman, V., Laut, J., Acquaviva, F., Rizzo, A. and Porfiri, M., “Dynamic modeling of a robotic fish propelled by a compliant tail,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 40 (1), 209–221 (2015).Google Scholar
31. Berenguer, F. J. and Monasterio-Huelin, F. M., “Zappa, a quasi-passive biped walking robot with a tail: Modeling, behavior, and kinematic estimation using accelerometers,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (9), 3281–3289 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Briggs, R., Lee, J., Haberland, M. and Kim, S., “Tails in Biomimetic Design: Analysis, Simulation, and Experiment,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2012) pp. 1473–1480.Google Scholar
33. Chang-Siu, E., Libby, T., Brown, M., Full, R. J. and Tomizuka, M., “A Nonlinear Feedback Controller for Aerial Self-Righting by a Tailed Robot,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2013) pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
34. Mutka, A., Orsag, M. and Kovacic, Z., “Stabilizing a Quadruped Robot Locomotion using a Two Degree of Freedom Tail,” 21st Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (2013) pp. 1336–1342.Google Scholar
35. Birglen, L., Laliberté, T. and Gosselin, C. M., Underactuated Robotic Hands (Springer, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007).Google Scholar
36. Balasubramanian, R. and Dollar, A. M., “A Framework for Studying Underactuation in the Human Hand,” Annual Meeting of the Americal Society of Biomechanics (2010) pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
37. Kier, W. M. and Smith, K. K., “Tongues, tentacles and trunks: The biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats,” Zoological J. Linnean Soc. 83 (4), 307–324 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Robinson, G. and Davies, J. B. C., “Continuum Robots–A State of the Art,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1999) pp. 2849–2854.Google Scholar
39. McMahan, W., Jones, B. A. and Walker, I. D., “Design and Implementation of a Multi-Section Continuum Robot: Air-Octor,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2005) pp. 2578–2585.Google Scholar
40. Tondu, B. and Lopez, P., “The McKibben muscle and its use in actuating robot-arms showing similarities with human arm behaviour,” Ind. Robot: An Int. J. 24 (6), 432–439 (1997).Google Scholar
41. Mazzolai, B., Margheri, L., Cianchetti, M., Dario, P. and Laschi, C., “Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions,” Bioinspiration Biomimetics 7 (2), 025005 (2012).Google Scholar
42. Simaan, N., Taylor, R. and Flint, P., “A Dexterous System for Laryngeal Surgery,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2004) pp. 351–357.Google Scholar
43. Tsukagoshi, H., Kitagawa, A. and Segawa, M., “Active Hose: An Aartificial Elephant's Nose With Maneuverability For Rescue Operation,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2001) pp. 2454–2459.Google Scholar
44. Wolf, A., Brown, H. B., Casciola, R., Costa, A., Schwerin, M., Shamas, E. and Choset, H., “A Mobile Hyper Redundant Mechanism for Search and Rescue Tasks,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2003) pp. 2889–2895.Google Scholar
45. Kwok, K.-W., Mylonas, G. P., Sun, L. W., Lerotic, M., Clark, J., Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A. and Yang, G.-Z., “Dynamic Active Constraints for Hyper-Redundant Flexible Robots,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2009) pp. 410–417.Google Scholar
46. Kim, Y.-J., Cheng, S., Kim, S. and Iagnemma, K., “A stiffness-adjustable hyperredundant manipulator using a variable neutral-line mechanism for minimally invasive surgery,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30 (2), 382–395 (2014).Google Scholar
47. Zhang, J. and Simaan, N., “Design of underactuated steerable electrode arrays for optimal insertions,” J. Mech. Robot. 5 (1), 011008 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. McMahan, W., Chitrakaran, V., Csencsits, M., Dawson, D., Walker, I. D., Jones, B. A., Pritts, M., Dienno, D., Grissom, M. and Rahn, C. D., “Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2006) pp. 2336–2341.Google Scholar
49. Cieslak, R. and Morecki, A., “Elephant trunk type elastic manipulator-a tool for bulk and liquid materials transportation,” Robotica 17 (01), 11–16 (1999).Google Scholar
50. Bajo, A., Goldman, R. E. and Simaan, N., “Configuration and Joint Feedback for Enhanced Performance of Multi-Segment Continuum Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (2011) pp. 2905–2912.Google Scholar
51. Chirikjian, G. S., “Conformational modeling of continuum structures in robotics and structural biology: A review,” Adv. Robot. 29 (13), 817–829 (2015).Google Scholar
52. Weber, B., Zeller, P. and Kühnlenz, K., “Multi-Camera-Based Real-Time Configuration Estimation of Continuum Robots,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2012) pp. 3350–3355.Google Scholar
53. Bajo, A. and Simaan, N., “Kinematics-based detection and localization of contacts along multisegment continuum robots,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 28 (2), 291–302 (2012).Google Scholar
54. Chen, Y., Oliveira, J. M. and Hunter, I. W., “Two-axis Bend Sensor Design, Kinematics and Control for a Continuum Robotic Endoscope,” 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2013) pp. 704–710.Google Scholar
55. Cianchetti, M., Renda, F., Licofonte, A. and Laschi, C., “Sensorization of Continuum Soft Robots for Reconstructing Their Spatial Configuration,” 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (2012) pp. 634–639.Google Scholar
56. Sareh, S., Noh, Y., Li, M., Ranzani, T., Liu, H. and Althoefer, K., “Macrobend optical sensing for pose measurement in soft robot arms,” Smart Mater. Struct. 24 (12), 125024 (2015).Google Scholar
57. Rollinson, D. and Choset, H., “Virtual Chassis for Snake Robots,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2011) pp. 221–226.Google Scholar
58. Rone, W. S. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Multi-Segment Continuum Robot Shape Estimation Using Passive Cable Displacement,” IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (2013) pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
59. Granosik, G., Borenstein, J. and Hansen, M. G., Serpentine Robots for Industrial Inspection and Surveillance (Citeseer, Germany, 2006).Google Scholar
60. Wright, C., Buchan, A., Brown, B., Geist, J., Schwerin, M., Rollinson, D., Tesch, M. and Choset, H., “Design and Architecture of the Unified Modular Snake Robot,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2012) pp. 4347–4354.Google Scholar
61. Date, H. and Takita, Y., “Adaptive Locomotion of a Snake Like Robot Based on Curvature Derivatives,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2007) pp. 3554–3559.Google Scholar
62. Maity, A. and Majumder, S., “Serpentine Robots: A Study of Design Philosophy,” International Conference on Advanced Robotics (2011) pp. 549–555.Google Scholar
63. Chirikjian, G. S. and Burdick, J. W., “The kinematics of hyper-redundant robot locomotion,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 11 (6), 781–793 (1995).Google Scholar
64. Hirose, S. and Yokoshima, K., “2 DOF Moray drive for hyper redundant manipulator,” In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 1735–1740).Google Scholar
65. Chirikjian, G. S. and Burdick, J. W., “A hyper-redundant manipulator,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 1 (4), 22–29 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Li, Z. and Du, R., “Design and analysis of a bio-inspired wire-driven multi-section flexible robot,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10 (4), 209 (2013).Google Scholar
67. Li, Z., Du, R., Lei, M. C. and Yuan, S. M., “Design and Analysis of a Biomimetic Wire-Driven Robot Arm,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2011) pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
68. Li, Z., Du, R., Yu, H. and Ren, H., “Statics Modeling of an Underactuated Wire-Driven Flexible Robotic Arm,” 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (2014) pp. 326–331.Google Scholar
69. Suh, J.-w., Kim, K.-y., Jeong, J.-w. and Lee, J.-j., “Design considerations for a hyper-redundant pulleyless rolling joint with elastic fixtures,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 20 (6), 2841–2852 (2015).Google Scholar
70. Cheng, N. G., Lobovsky, M. B., Keating, S. J., Setapen, A. M., Gero, K. I., Hosoi, A. E. and Iagnemma, K. D., “Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-Cost, Highly Articulated Manipulator Enabled by Jamming of Granular Media,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2012) pp. 4328–4333.Google Scholar
71. Kim, Y.-J., Cheng, S., Kim, S. and Iagnemma, K., “Design of a Tubular Snake-Like Manipulator with Stiffening Capability by Layer Jamming,” 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2012) pp. 4251–4256.Google Scholar
72. Jacobsen, S. C., Iversen, E. K., Knutti, D. F., Johnson, R. T. and Biggers, K. B., “Design of the Utah/MIT Dextrous Hand,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1986) pp. 1520–1532.Google Scholar
73. Loucks, C. S., Johnson, V. J., Boissiere, P. T., Starr, G. P. and Steele, J. P., “Modeling and Control of the Stanford/JPL Hand,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1987) pp. 573–578.Google Scholar
74. Hirose, S. and Umetani, Y., “The development of soft gripper for the versatile robot hand,” Mech. Mach. Theory 13 (3), 351–359 (1978).Google Scholar
75. Catalano, M. G., Grioli, G., Farnioli, E., Serio, A., Piazza, C. and Bicchi, A., “Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand,” The Int. J. Robot. Res. 33 (5), 768–782 (2014).Google Scholar
76. Palli, G. (2007). Model and control of tendon actuated robots (Doctoral dissertation, alma).Google Scholar
77. Ozawa, R., Kobayashi, H. and Hashirii, K., “Analysis, classification, and design of tendon-driven mechanisms,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30 (2), 396–410 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Colgate, E. and Hogan, N., “An Analysis of Contact Instability in Terms of Passive Physical Equivalents,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1989) pp. 404–409.Google Scholar
79. Saab, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Design and Analysis of a Robotic Modular Leg,” International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (2016) p. V05AT07A062.Google Scholar
80. Saab, W., Rone, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Robotic modular leg: Design, analysis and experimentation,” J. Mech. Robot. 9 (2), 024501–024501–024506 (2017).Google Scholar
81. Adams, M.S.C. and Documentation, C., 2005. Msc. Software Corporation.Google Scholar
82. McGhee, R. B. and Frank, A. A., “On the stability properties of quadruped creeping gaits,” Math. Biosci. 3, 331–351 (1968).Google Scholar