Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:00:34.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a Bio-inspired Wall-Climbing Robot Composed of Spine Wheels, Adhesive Belts and Eddy Suction Cup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2020

Jinfu Liu Open the ORCID record for Jinfu Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Linsen Xu ,
Shouqi Chen ,
Hong Xu ,
Gaoxin Cheng  and
Jiajun Xu
Jinfu Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, CAS, Hefei, China University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China E-mail: [email protected]
Linsen Xu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, CAS, Hefei, China Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Sensing and Advanced Robot Technology, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Shouqi Chen
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China E-mail: [email protected]
Hong Xu
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China E-mail: [email protected]
Gaoxin Cheng
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China E-mail: [email protected]
Jiajun Xu
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A novel wall-climbing robot with multiple attachment modes is proposed. For uneven surfaces, the mechanical model of a spine wheel is brought out to grab the surfaces with its multi-spines. For smooth surfaces, an adhesive belt is obtained by the industrial synchronous belt and the polyurethane material to adhere to the surfaces. To avoid the robot overturning, an adsorption device with flexible skirt edge is presented. In addition, the normal force and motor torque are evaluated respectively. Finally, the prototype of the wall-climbing robot is manufactured and tested, and the experimental results show that the robot could climb the wall surface 0–360° with a maximum load of 0.5 kg.

Keywords

Wall-climbing robotSpine wheelAdhesive beltEddy suction cupFlexible skirt edge
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 3 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sato, E., Iki, S., Yamanishi, K., Horibe, H. and Matsumoto, A., “Dismantlable adhesion properties of reactive acrylic copolymers resulting from cross-linking and gas evolution,” J. Adhes. 93(10), 811–822 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, M., Lourençoa, J., Viegas, C., Neto, P. and de Almeida, A. T., “The hybrid Omni Climber robot: Wheel based climbing, arm based plane transition, and switchable magnet adhesion,” Mechatronics 36, 136–146 (2016).10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purtov, J., Frensemeier, M., and Kroner, E., “Switchable adhesion in vacuum using bio-inspired dry adhesives,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(43), 24127–24135 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishi, A., “Development of wall-climbing robots,” Comput. Electric. Eng. 22(2), 123–149 (1996).10.1016/0045-7906(95)00034-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, B. L., Collie, A. A. and Billingsley, J., “Robug II: An Intelligent Wall Climbing robot,” Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California (IEEE, 1991) pp. 2342–2347.Google Scholar
Kim, D., Hong, H., Kim, H. S. and Kim, J., “Optimal design and kinetic analysis of a stair-climbing mobile robot with rocker-bogie mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory 50, 90–108 (2012).10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, B. L., Galt, S. and Chen, S., “Using genetic algorithms to establish efficient walking gaits for an eight-legged robot,” Int. J. Syst. Sci. 32(6), 703–713 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, I. M., Trong, T. D., Lee, Y. H., Moon, H., Koo, J., Park, S. K. and Choi, H. R., “Development of wall climbing robot system by using impeller type adhesion mechanism,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 72(1), 57–72 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, M., Dulimarta, H., Danghi, G., Mukherjee, R., Tummala, R. L. and Aslam, D., “Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Under-Actuated Miniature Biped Climbing Robot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Takamatsu, Japan, (IEEE, 2000) pp. 1999–2005.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. and Li, X., “Experimental investigation on climbing robot using rotation-flow adsorption unit,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 105, 112–120 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, C., Murphy, M. and Sitti, M., “Gecko Inspired Surface Climbing Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Shenyang, China, (IEEE, 2004) pp. 431–436.Google Scholar
Menon, C. and Sitti, M., “Biologically Inspired Adhesion Based Surface Climbing Robots,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain (IEEE, 2005) pp. 2715–2720.Google Scholar
Seo, T. W. and Sitti, M., “Tank-like module-based climbing robot using passive compliant joints,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18(1), 397–408 (2013).10.1109/TMECH.2011.2182617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unver, O. and Sitti, M., “A Miniature Ceiling Walking Robot with Flat Tacky Elastomeric Footpads,” 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan (IEEE, 2009) pp. 2276–2281.10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Wang, X., Mei, T. and Sun, S., “Mechanical analyses on the digital behavior of the Tokay Gecko (Gekko Gecko) based on a multi-level directional adhesion model,” Proc. R. Soc. 471(2179), 1–20 (2015).Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, S., Asbeck, A. T., Cutkosky, M. R. and Provancher, W. R., “SpinybotII: Climbing Hard Walls with Compliant Microspines,” International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Seattle, WA, USA, (IEEE, 2005) pp. 601–602.Google Scholar
Asbeck, A. T., Kim, S., McClung, A., Parness, A. and Cutkosky, M. R., “Climbing Walls with Microspines,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, USA (IEEE, 2006) pp. 4315–4317.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Asbeck, A. T., Cutkosky, M. R., Provancher, W. R. and Lanzetta, M., “Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 25(25), 1165–1179 (2006).Google Scholar
Saunders, A., Goldman, D. I., Full, R. J. and Buehler, M., “The rise climbing robot: Body and leg design,” International Society for Optical Engineering, Orlando, Florida, United States, 2006, p. 623017.Google Scholar
Autumn, K., Buehler, M., Cutkosky, M., Fearing, R., Full, R. J., Goldman, D., Groff, R., Provancher, W., Rizzi, A. A., Saranli, U. and Saunders, A., “Robotics in scansorial environments,” Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 5804, 291–302 (2005).Google Scholar
Spenko, M. J., Haynes, G. C., Sanders, J. A., Cutkosky, M. R., Rizzi, A. A., Full, R. J. and Koditschek, D. E., “Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot,” J. Field Robot. 25(4–5), 223–242 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, G. C., Khripin, A., Lynch, G., Amory, J., Saunders, A., Rizzi, A. A. and Koditschek, D. E., “Rapid Pole Climbing with a Quadrupedal Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan (IEEE, 2009) pp. 2762–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parness, A., Frost, M., Thatte, N., King, J. P., Witkoe, K., Nevarez, M., Garrett, M., Aghazarian, H. and Kennedy, B., “Gravity-independent rock-climbing robot and a sample acquisition tool with microspine grippers,” J. Field Robot. 30(6), 897–915 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D., Zhang, Q. and Liu, S., “Design and realization of a flexible claw of rough wall climbing robot,” Adv. Mater. Res. 328, 388–392 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Sun, S., Wu, X. and Mei, T., “A wheeled wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine mechanisms,” J. Bionic Eng. 12(1), 17–28 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., Wu, S., Zhu, P. and Liu, R., “Analysis on the Dynamic Climbing Forces of a Gecko Inspired Climbing Robot Based on GPL Model,” 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Hamburg, Germany, (2015) pp. 3314–3319.Google Scholar
Ji, A., Zhao, Z., Manoonpong, P., Wang, W., Chen, G. and Dai, Z., “A bio-inspired climbing robot with flexible pads and claws,” J. Bionic Eng. 15(2), 368–378 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederegger, S. and Gorb, S., “Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate,” J. Insect Physiol. 49(6), 611–620 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X., Research on the Bio-Inspired Dry Adhesive Mechanism and the Wall-Climbing Robot Ph.D. Dissertation (School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 2015).Google Scholar