Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:12:48.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and analysis of CICABOT: a novel translational parallel manipulator based on two 5-bar mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2011

M. F. Ruiz-Torres
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigacion en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnologia Avanzada, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Cerro Blanco 141, Colinas del Cimatario, Queretaro, Mexico
E. Castillo-Castaneda*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigacion en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnologia Avanzada, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Cerro Blanco 141, Colinas del Cimatario, Queretaro, Mexico
J. A. Briones-Leon
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigacion en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnologia Avanzada, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Cerro Blanco 141, Colinas del Cimatario, Queretaro, Mexico
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

This work presents the CICABOT, a novel 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator (TPM) with large workspace. The manipulator consists of two 5-bar mechanisms connected by two prismatic joints; the moving platform is on the union of these prismatic joints; each 5-bar mechanism has two legs. The mobility of the proposed mechanism, based on Gogu approach, is also presented. The inverse and direct kinematics are solved from geometric analysis. The manipulator's Jacobian is developed from the vector equation of the robot legs; the singularities can be easily derived from Jacobian matrix. The manipulator workspace is determined from analysis of a 5-bar mechanism; the resulting workspace is the intersection of two hollow cylinders that is much larger than other TPM with similar dimensions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lindem, T. J. and Charles, P. A. S., “Octahedral machine with a hexapodal triangular servostrut section,” USA Patent 5401128 (1995).Google Scholar
2.Toyama, T., Yamakawa, Y. and Susuki, H., “Machine tool having parallel structure,” USA Patent 5715729 (1998).Google Scholar
3.Yau, C. L., “Systems and methods employing a rotary track for machining and manufacturing,” USA Patent 6196081 (2001).Google Scholar
4.Clavel, R., “Device for the movement and positionin of an element in space,” USA Patent 4976582 (1990).Google Scholar
5.Pierrot, F., Company, O., Shibukawa, T. and Morita, K., “Four-degree-of-freedom parallel robot,” USA Patent 6516681 (2003).Google Scholar
6.Tsai, L. W., “Multi-degree of freedom mechanism for machine tools and the like,” USA Patent 5656905 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Sheldon, P. C., Six Axis Machine Tool, USA Patent 5388935 (1995).Google Scholar
8.Huang, T., Li, Z. X., Li, M., Chetwynd, D. G. and Gosselin, C. M.. “Conceptual design and dimensional synthesis of a novel 2-DOF translational parallel robot for pick-and-place operations,” J. Mech. Des. 126 (5), 449455 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chablat, D. and Wenger, P., “Architecture optimization of a 3-DOF translational parallel mechanism for machining applications, the orthoglide,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19, 403410 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ruggiu, M., “Kinematics analysis of the CUR translational manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 10871098 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gosselin, C. M. and Angeles, J., “The optimum kinematic design of a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator,” J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des. 111, 202207 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF spherical parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 126, 101108 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF translational parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 126, 8392 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Yu, J., Dai, J. S., Bi, S. and Zong, G., “Numeration and type synthesis of 3-DOF orthogonal translational parallel manipulators,” Prog. Nat. Sci. 18, 563574 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Refaat, S., Hervé, J. M., Nahavandi, S. and Trinh, H., “Asymmetrical three-DOFs rotational-translational parallel-kinematics mechanisms based on Lie group theory,” Eur. J. Mech. A 25, 550558 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hervé, J. M. and Sparacino, F., “Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots Generating Spatial Translation,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy (1991) vol. 1, pp. 803813.Google Scholar
17.Angeles, J., “The qualitative synthesis of parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 126, 617624 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lee, C. and Hervé, J. M., “Translational parallel manipulators with doubly planar limbs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 41, 433455 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Stocco, L. J. and Salcudean, S. E., “Hybrid serial/parallel manipulator,” USA Patent 6047610 (2000).Google Scholar
20.Monsarrat, B. and Gosselin, C., “Workspace analysis and optimal design of a 3-Leg 6-DOF parallel platform mechanism,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19, 954966 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Liu, X., Wang, J. and Zheng, H., “Optimum design of the 5R symmetrical parallel manipulator with surrounded and good-condition workspace,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 54, 221233 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ionescu, T. G., “Terminology for mechanisms and machine science,” Mech. Mach. Theory 38 597901 (2003).Google Scholar
23.Gogu, G., “Mobility of mechanisms: A critical review,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 10681097 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Hunt, K., Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1978).Google Scholar
25.Gogu, G., “Chebychev–Grübler–Kutzbach's criterion for mobility calculation of multi-loop mechanisms revisited via theory of linear transformations,” Eur. J. Mech. A 24, 427441 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Gogu, G., Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots, Part 1—Methodology (Springer, The Netherlands, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar