Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T20:30:59.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contour tracking of an unknown planar object by regulating force for mobile robot navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2006

Seul Jung*
Affiliation:
BK 21 Mechatronics Group, Intelligent Systems and Emotional Engineering Laboratory, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Korea
Poongwoo Jeon
Affiliation:
BK 21 Mechatronics Group, Intelligent Systems and Emotional Engineering Laboratory, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Korea
T. C. Hsia
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In this paper, a novel contour-tracking control method of an unknown planar object by lateral force regulation for wheeled mobile robot navigation is presented. The robot is required to follow the contour of an unknown object toward the goal position. Based on mobile robot dynamic equations, a force-control algorithm is proposed to maintain constant contact with a planar object. Measured contact force from an object is used not only to regulate a contact force in a lateral direction, but also to control the orientation angle of the robot to avoid collision with an object. Simulation and experiment of contour-tracking tasks of a wheeled mobile robot are conducted. Experimental results show that the contact force is well-regulated, and the robot arrives at the goal position successfully.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Borenstein, J., “Experimental evaluation of a fiber optic gyroscope for improving dead-reckoning accuracy in mobile robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation 1998 pp. 3456–3461.Google Scholar
2.Jetto, L., Longhi, S. and Venturini, G., “Development and experimental validation of an adaptive extended Kalman filter for the localization of mobile robots,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15 (2), 219229 (Apr. 1999).Google Scholar
3.Larsen, T. D., Hansen, K. L., Anderson, N. A. and Ravn, O., “Design of Kalman filters for mobile robots; evaluation of the kinematics and odometric approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Piscataway, NJ 1999 pp. 1021–1026.Google Scholar
4.Tsai, C. C., “A localization system of a mobile robot by fusing dead-reckoning and ultrasonic measurements,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, Minnesota (May 18–21, 1998) pp. 144–149.Google Scholar
5.Jang, P. S., Jang, E. S., Jeon, S. W. and Jung, S., “Neural network based guidance control of a mobile robot,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, Automations and Systems 2003 pp. 1099–1104.Google Scholar
6.Sarkar, N., Yun, X., and Kumar, V., “Control of mechanical systems with rolling constraints: Application to dynamic control of mobile robots,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 31, 5569 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Komanovsky, I. and McClamroch, N. H., “Developments in non-hononomic control problems,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 15 (6), 2036 1995.Google Scholar
8.Jang, Z. P. and Nijmeijer, H., “Tracking control of mobile robots: A case study in backstepping,” Automatica 33 (7), 13931399 1997.Google Scholar
9.Wu, W., Chen, H. and Wang, Y., “Backstepping design for path tracking of mobile robots,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1999 pp. 1822–1827.Google Scholar
10.Kanayama, Y., Kimura, Y., Miyazaki, F. and Noguchi, T., “A stable tracking control method for a non-holonomic mobile robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 1991 pp. 1236–1241.Google Scholar
11.Kanayama, Y. and Fahroo, F., “A new line tracking method for non-holonomic vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automations 1997 pp. 2908–2913.Google Scholar
12.Chung, Y., Park, C. and Harashima, F., “A position control differential drive wheeled mobile robot,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 48 (4), 853863 2001.Google Scholar
13.Hogan, N., “Impedance control: An approach to manipulator, part i, ii, iii,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 3, 124 1985.Google Scholar
14.Raibert, M. and Craig, J., “Hybrid position/force control of manipulators,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 102, 126133 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Anderson, R. and Spong, M. W., “Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation 1987 pp. 1073–1080.Google Scholar
16.Liu, G. J. and Goldenberg, A. A., “Robust hybrid impedance control of robot manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation 1991 pp. 287–292.Google Scholar
17.Colbaugh, R., Seraji, H. and Glass, K., “Direct adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 10, 217248 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Jung, S. and Hsia, T. C., “Robust neural force control scheme under uncertainties in robot dynamics and unknown environment,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 47 (2), 403412 2000.Google Scholar
19.Byrne, R. H., Abdallah, C. T., and Dorato, P., “Experimental results in robust lateral control of highway vehicles,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 70–76 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Fritz, H., “Longitudinal and lateral control of heavy duty trucks for automated vehicle following in mixed traffic: Experimental results from the CHAUFFEUR project,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications 1999 pp. 1348–1352.Google Scholar
21.Cai, L., Rad, A. B. and Cai, K. Y., “A robust fuzzy PD controller for automatic steering control of autonomous vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2003 pp. 549–554.Google Scholar