Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:27:03.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blend of independent joint control and variable structure systems for uni-drive modular robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Hamidreza Karbasi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Jan Paul Huissoon*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Amir Khajepour
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In this paper, a control design methodology for a new class of modular robots, so-called “uni-drive modular robots” is introduced. Uni-drive modular robots have a substantial advantage over regular modular robots in terms of the mass of each module since then employ only a single drive for powering all the joints. The drive is mounted at the robot base and all joints tap power from this single drive using clutches. By controlling the engagement time of the clutches, the position and velocity of the joints are regulated. After reviewing the structure of the uni-drive modular robot, a self-expansion formula to generate the dynamics of the robot is introduced. The control of uni-drive n-module robots is realized by blending independent joint control and theory of variable structure systems via a pulse width modulation technique. A uni-drive modular robot is used to conduct simulations and validate the control design technique.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ambrose, R., Design, Construction and Demonstration of Modular, Reconfigurable Robots Ph.D. Thesis (Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1991).Google Scholar
2.Chocron, O., “Evolutionary design of modular robotic arms,” Robotica 26 (3), 323330 (May–Jun. 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Liu, G. J., Abdul, S. and Goldenberg, A. A., “Distributed control of modular and reconfigurable robot with torque sensing,” Robotica 26 (1), 7584 (Jan.–Feb. 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fei, Y. Q., Zhao, X. F. and Song, L. B., “A method for modular robots generating dynamics automatically,” Robotica 19 (1), 5966 (Jan.–Feb. 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chen, I. and Yang, G., “Configuration Independent Kinematics for Modular Robots,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN (1996) pp. 14401445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cohen, R., Lipton, M., Dai, M. and Benhabib, B., “Conceptual design of a modular robot,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 114, 117125, (Mar. 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Fukuda, T. and Nakagawa, S., “Dynamically Reconfigurable Robotic System,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA (1988) pp. 15811586.Google Scholar
8.Paredis, C., Brown, H., Casciola, R., Moody, J. and Khosla, P., “A Rapidly Deployable Manipulator System,” International Workshop on Some Critical Issues in Robotics, Singapore (1995) pp. 175185.Google Scholar
9.Wurst, K., “The Conception and Construction of a Modular Robot System,” International Symposium on Industrial Robotics, San Francisco, CA (1986) pp. 3744.Google Scholar
10.Matsumaru, T., “Design and Control of the Modular Robot System: Tomms,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan (1995) pp. 21252131.Google Scholar
11.Schmitz, D., Khosla, P. and Kanade, T., “The CMU Reconfigurable Modular Manipulator System,” Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-88-7 (Carnegie Mellon University, 1988).Google Scholar
12.Ishii, Y., Fukuzawa, T., Ichikawa, Y., Suzuki, M., Naito, S. and Iwatsuka, N., “A Joint Connection Mechanism and Control System for a Reconfigurable Manipulator,” SICE '92, Kobe, Japan (1992) pp. 10951098.Google Scholar
13.Yim, M., Shen, W., Salemi, B., Rus, D., Mall, M., Lipson, H., Klavins, E., Chirikjian, G. S., “Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems: Challenges and opportunities for the future,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14 (1), 4352 (Mar. 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Yim, M., “A Reconfigurable Modular Robot with Many Modes of Locomotion,” Proceedings of the JSME International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Tokyo, Japan, (1993) pp. 10951098.Google Scholar
15.Karbasi, H., Huissoon, J. P. and Khajepour, A., “Experimental and theoretical analysis of a uni-drive modular robot: Design and Modeling,” Proceedings of DETC/CIE'02: 27th ASME biennial mechanisms and robotics conference, CDRom-DETC2002/MECH-34351, Montreal, Canada (Sep. 29–Oct. 2, 2002).Google Scholar
16.Karbasi, H., Khajepour, A., Huissoon, J. P. and Park, S. J., “A New Modular Robot: Uni-Drive with Pulse Width Modulation Control,” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications, ISBN: 0-88986-313-x, Tampa, FL (Nov. 2001) pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
17.Karbasi, H., Huissoon, Jan P. and Khajepour, A., “Uni-drive modular robots: Theory, design and experiments,” J. Mech. Mach. Theory 39, 183200 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chen, W. J. and Xie, M., “On the Design of a Novel Dexterous Hand,” Ninth International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Tokyo, Japan, (Oct. 25–27, 1992) pp. 6165.Google Scholar
19.Sira-Ramirez, H., Zribi, M. and Ahmad, S., “Pulse width modulated control of robotic manipulator,” Int. J. Syst. Sci. 24 (8), 14231437 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Choi, S. and Cho, D.-W., “Control of wheel slip ratio using sliding mode controller with pulse width modulation,” J. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 39 267284 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Han, S.-S., Choi, S.-B. and Cheong, C.-C., “Position control of x-y table mechanism using electro-rheological clutches,” J. Mech. Mach. Theory 35, 15631577 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Hamidreza, Karbasi Uni-Drive Modular Robots Ph.D. Thesis (Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo, 2003).Google Scholar
23.Park, S. J., The Conceptual Design of a Multi-Linked Modular Robot and the Feasibility Study of the Modular Robot Joint Drive Method Master Thesis (Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo, 2002).Google Scholar
24.Young, K. K. D., “Controller design for a manipulator using theory of variable structure systems,” IEEE Trans. Sys., Man, Cyber. SMC-8 (2), 101109 (Feb. 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Slotine, J. J. E. and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1991).Google Scholar
26.Utkin, V. I., “Variable structure systems with Sliding mode,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-22 (2), 212222 (Feb. 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar