Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T16:24:27.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis and Evaluation on Unloading Ratio of Zero-g Simulation System Based on Torques of Space Manipulator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2019

Sihui Tian
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Xiaoqiang Tang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-Precision Manufacturing Equipments and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Yuqi Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In this paper, a dynamic model of a seven-joints manipulator operated in a zero-g simulation system is established. The errors of the friction, the suspension force, and the flexible deformation of arms are considered. Furthermore, the unloading ratio, which can evaluate the performance of the simulation system, is presented. It can reflect the level of similarity between the system and the space environment directly and effectively. The results of experimental and theoretical analyses verify the correctness of the model. It helps us to get the joint torques when the actual space manipulator without the torque sensor operates in this system and guarantees the safety of the experiments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flores-Abad, A., Ma, O., Pham, K. and Ulrich, S., “A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 68(8), 126 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellery, A., Kreisel, J. and Sommer, B., “The case for robotic on-orbit servicing of spacecraft: Spacecraft reliability is a myth,” Acta Astronaut. 63(5), 632648 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alshibli, M. M., “Modeling and control of a free-flying space robot interacting with a target satellite,” Mech. Industrial Eng., 1516 (2005).Google Scholar
Dengyun, Y. U., “Suggestion on development of Chinese space manipulator technology,” Spacecraft Eng. 16(4), 18 (2007).Google Scholar
Fujii, H., Yoneoka, H. and Uchiyama, K., “Experiments on Cooperative Motion of a Space Robot,” Ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems ’93, IROS, vol. 3 (1993) pp. 21552162.Google Scholar
Yang, Q. and Liu, H. W., “Robot Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Micro-gravity Conditions,” 4th International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering, 985990 (2015).Google Scholar
Sato, Y., Ejiri, A., Iida, Y. and Kanda, S., “Micro-g Emulation System Using Constant-Tension Suspension for a Space Manipulator,” Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3 (1991) pp. 18931900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junshan, L. I., Min, X. U., Zhang, S. and Chu, J., “Design of ground microgravity compensation experiment system based on the suspension spring,” Machinery Electronics, vol. 8 (2014) pp. 3437.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., “Gravity compensation for rocker-bogie rovers through single string tension,” J. Mech. Eng. 49(7), 113124 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, S., Tang, X. and Xiang, C., “Equivalence analysis of mass and inertia for simulated space manipulator based on constant mass. Machines 5(4), 31 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korayem, M. H., Heidari, A. and Nikoobin, A., “Maximum allowable dynamic load of exible mobile manipulators using finite element approach,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 36(5–6), 606617 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Chen, X. and Han, W., “Modeling of a space exible probecone docking system based on the kane method,” Chinese J. Aeron, 27(2), 248258 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H. and Huang, Y., “Robust adaptive output feedback tracking control for fiexible-joint robot manipulators based on singularly perturbed decoupling,” Robotica, 36(6), 822838 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Fonseca, I. M., Goes, L. C. S., Seito, N., da Silva Duarte, M. K. and de Oliveira, E. J., “Attitude dynamics and control of a spacecraft like a robotic manipulator when implementing on-orbit servicing,” Acta Astron. vol. 137 (2016) pp. 490497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, G., Iagnemma, K. and Dubowsky, S., “The precise control of manipulators with high joint-friction using base force/torque sensing,” Automatica 36(7), 931941 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr Brown, H. B. and Dolan, J. M, “A novel gravity compensation system for space robots,” Nov. 11, 250 (1994).Google Scholar
Lpez-Martnez, J., Garca-Vallejo, D., Gimenez-Fernandez, A. and Torres-Moreno, J. L., “A flexible multibody model of a safety robot arm for experimental validation and analysis of design parameters,” J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn. 9(1), 110 (2014).Google Scholar
Simoni, L., Beschi, M., Legnani, G. and Visioli, A., “Modelling the temperature in joint friction of industrial manipulators,” Robotica, 122 (2017).Google Scholar
Arvo, J., “Fast random rotation matrices,” Graphics Gems III (1992) pp. 117120.Google Scholar
Zheng, Q., Tang, Q. and Zhang, L., “Review of modelling and analysis methods of space manipulators,” Manned Spaceflight 23(1), 8296 (2017).Google Scholar
Kibble, T. W. B. and Berkshire, F. H., Classical Mechanics (5th ed.), (Imperial College Press, London, 2004) p. 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar