Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:15:19.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-dimensional swimming robotic fish with slide-block structure: design and realization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2013

Yongnan Jia*
Affiliation:
Intelligent Control Laboratory, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
Long Wang
Affiliation:
Intelligent Control Laboratory, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

This paper focuses on the mechanism design of a slide-block structure and its application on a biomimetic modular robotic fish for three-dimensional swimming. First, as a barycenter-adjustor, the slide-block structure is integrated into a mechanical design of a robotic fish, which is constructed by a control module, a driving module, and a fan-shaped caudal fin. The three-dimensional locomotion of robotic fish is decomposed into two-dimensional locomotion in horizontal plane and ascent–descent locomotion in vertical plane. Both the kinematics of the horizontal swim and the dynamics of the ascent–descent swim are analyzed by the curve fitting method. Finally, experimental results validate the three-dimensional swimming capability of the robotic fish. Furthermore, the impact of two design parameters on the swimming capability of the robotic fish is discussed by the experimental method. The experimental results confirm that the robotic fish with one driving module and a fan-shaped low-aspect-ratio caudal foil can produce higher propulsive speed than other parameter combinations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lauder, G. V. and Liem, K. F., “The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 150, 95197 (1983).Google Scholar
2.Nelson, J. S., Fishes of the World, 4th ed. (John Wiley, New York, NY, 2006).Google Scholar
3.Barrett, D., Grosenbaugh, M. and Triantafyllou, M., “The Optimal Control of a Flexible Hull Robotic Undersea Vehicle Propelled by an Oscillating Foil,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (1996) pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
4.Lighthill, M. J., “Note on the swimming of slender fish,” J. Fluid Mech. 9, 305317 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wu, T. Yao-Tsu, “Hydromechanics of swimming propulsion. Part 3. Swimming and optimum movements of slender fish with side fins,” J. Fluid Mech. 46, 545568 (1971).Google Scholar
6.Mason, R. and Burdick, J., “Experiments in Carangiform Robotic Fish Locomotion,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1 (2000) pp. 428435.Google Scholar
7.McIsaac, K. and Ostrowski, J., “A Geometric Approach to Anguilliform Locomotion: Modeling of an Underwater eel Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4 (1999) pp. 28432848.Google Scholar
8.Kato, N. and Furushima, M., “Pectoral Fin Model for Manuever of Underwater Vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (1996) pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
9.Yu, J., Wang, L. and Tan, M., “A Framework for Biomimetic Robot Fish's Design and its Realization,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference (2005) pp. 1593–1598.Google Scholar
10.Hu, H., Liu, J., Dukes, I. and Francis, G., “Design of 3D Swimming Patterns for Autonomous Robotic Fish,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vols. 1–12 (2006) pp. 24062411.Google Scholar
11.Kalantar, S. and Zimmer, U. R., “Scale-Adaptive Polygonal Formations of Submersible Vehicles and Tracking Isocontours,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vols. 1–3 (2008) pp. 31463151.Google Scholar
12.Zhang, D., Wang, L. and Yu, J., “Coordinated Control of Two Biomimetic Robotic Fish in Pushing-Object Task,” IET Control Theory Appl. 3, 281C293 (2009).Google Scholar
13.Morgansen, K. A., Triplett, B. I. and Klein, D. J., “Geometric methods for modeling and control of free-swimming fin-actuated underwater vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 23, 11841199 (2007).Google Scholar
14.Hu, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, W., Wang, Q. and Zhang, L., “Modular Design and Motion Control of Reconfigurable Robotic Fish,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vols. 1–14 (2007) pp. 51565161.Google Scholar
15.Zhou, C., Cao, Z., Wang, S. and Tan, M., “The Posture Control and 3D Locomotion Implementation of Biomimetic Robot Fish,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vols. 1–12 (2006) pp. 54065411.Google Scholar
16.Gumusel, L., Buoyancy Gravity-Powered Underwater Robot Master's thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, 1987.Google Scholar
17.Baz, A. and Gumusel, L., “Optimum design of a buoyancy and gravity-driven underwater robot,” J. Robot. Syst. 13 (7), 461473 (1996).Google Scholar
18.Baz, A. and Gumusel, L., “Experimental and theoretical evaluation of the buoyancy and gravity-driven underwater robots,” Robotica 13 (3), 273286 (1995).Google Scholar
19.Sfakiotakis, M., Lane, D. M. and Davies, J. B. C., “Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 24, 237252 (1999).Google Scholar
20.Lindsey, C. C., “Form, function and locomotory habits in fish,” Fish Physiol. 7, 1C100 (1978).Google Scholar
21.Low, K. H. and Chong, C. W., “Parametric study of the swimming performance of a fish robot propelled by a flexible caudal fin,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 5, 046002 (2010).Google Scholar
22.Bandyopadhyay, P. R., Beal, D. N. and Menozzi, A., “Research article biorobotic insights into how animals swim,” J. Exp. Biol. 211, 206214 (2008).Google Scholar