Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:19:07.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prostatic resection: an example of safe robotic surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

B. L. Davies
Affiliation:
Robotics Centre, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London SW72BX (U.K.)
W. S. Ng
Affiliation:
Robotics Centre, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London SW72BX (U.K.)
R. D. Hibberd
Affiliation:
Robotics Centre, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London SW72BX (U.K.)

Extract

A special-purpose robot for prostatectomies has been developed. Details of the robot mechanism, control system and human/computer interface (HCI) are discussed with special emphasis on software methods to ensure system safety. The clinical application of the system is described and software requirements for operating-theatre use are indicated. These requirements include safe error recovery, facilitation of reliable surgical procedures, and an effective HCI.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Davies, B.L., and Hibberd, R.D. et al. , “A Surgeon Robot Prostatectomy—A Laboratory EvaluationJ. Medical Engineering & Technology 13, No. 6, 273277 (11, 1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Timoney, A. G., Ng, W.S., Davies, B.L., Hibberd, R.D. and Wickham, J.E.A., “The use of robots in surgery: The development of a frame for prostatectomy”, J. Endourology 5, No. 2, 165168 (06, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ng, W.S., Timoney, A.G., Davies, B.L., Hibberd, R.D. and Wickham, J.E.A., “A Robotic Approach to Prostatectomy” DTI-IARP Programme, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Sensor Fusion and Environmental Modelling,Oxford(Sept., 1991) Session 4a.Google Scholar
4.Davies, B.L., Hibberd, R.D., Ng, W.S., Timoney, A.G. and Wickham, J.E.A., “Mechanical Constraints – The Answer to Safe Robotic Surgery?Innovation et Technologie en Biologie et Medicine 13, No. 4, 425436 (1992).Google Scholar
5.Holtgrewe, H.L. et al. , “Factors in Influencing the Mortality and Morbidity of Transurethral Prostatectomy: A study of 2015 casesJ. Urology 87, 450453 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Edwards, R., “Robotics in Medicine: Safety AspectsRobotics in Medicinex Seminar, I. Mech. E. (14 06, 1990).Google Scholar
7.Rawson, E., “Some points arising from the CITI conference ‘Safety of Software Controlled Medical Equipment’” Appendix A, Functional specification for the control and interfacing of sub-systems in SAR, Doc Ref: L002 (Oct., 1989).Google Scholar
8.Kwee, H.H. et al. , The MANUS Telethesis; A Progress Report (Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, 1990/1991).Google Scholar
9.Taylor, Russell H. and Paul, Howard A. et al. , “Taming the Bull: Safety in a Precise Surgical Robot”, Proceedings of the 5th Int'l Conference on Advanced Robotics,Pisa(June, 1991) pp. 865870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ng, W.S., Transfer Report: “Development of a Surgeon Assistant Robot for Prostatectomy”. No. RCR/01'91 (Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Oct, 1991).Google Scholar
11.Armbrust, S. & Forgeron, T., Programmers' Reference Manual for IBM PCs (Dow Jones-Irwin, Illinois, 1987).Google Scholar
12.Kernighan, B.W. and Ritchie, D.M., The C (ANSI) Programming Language (Prentice Hall International, 1988).Google Scholar
13.Macro, J. and Buxton, A., The Craft of Software Engineering (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.. 1987).Google Scholar