Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:12:55.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Path planning of the hybrid parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Hamid Rakhodaei ,
Mozafar Saadat ,
Alireza Rastegarpanah  and
Che Zulkhairi Abdullah
Hamid Rakhodaei
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
Mozafar Saadat*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
Alireza Rastegarpanah
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
Che Zulkhairi Abdullah
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents a new configuration for ankle rehabilitation using a 9-DOF (degree of freedom) hybrid parallel robot. The robot contains nine linear actuators serially connecting two movable platforms and one stationary platform. The optimization is based on the singularity and dynamic analysis of the robot. The obtained data of the ankle motions from a series of experiments were applied to the model in order to investigate the motion of the end-effector and the force required for each actuator in a particular path. The end-effector tracking simulation results validated the proposed theoretical analysis of the required rehabilitation path of the foot.

Keywords

Control of robotic systemsPath planningDesignForce controlParallel manipulators
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 173 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Huang, T., Zhao, X. and Whitehouse, D. J., “Stiffness estimation of a tripod-based parallel kinematic machine,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18 (1), 50–58 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wang, Z., Chen, L. and Sun, L., “An Integrated Parallel Micromanipulator with Flexure Hinges for Optical Fiber Alignment,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Harbin, China (Aug. 5–8, 2007) pp. 2530–2534.Google Scholar
3.Wu, D., Du, Z., Tian, H., Jiang, Z. and Sun, L., “FPGA-based Control System for 6-UPS Medical Parallel Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation, Changsha, China (Dec. 18–20, 2010) pp. 744–748.Google Scholar
4.Hu, B., Sui, C., Han, J., Yu, J. and Lu, Y., “Static and stiffness model of serial-parallel manipulator formed by k parallel manipulators connected in series,” J. Mech. Robot. ASME 4 (2), (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tanev, T. K., “Kinematic of hybrid (parallel-serial) robot manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 35, 1183–1196 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Liu, X. J., Wang, J. and Pritschow, G., “A new family of spatial 3-DoF fully-parallel manipulators with high rotational capability,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 475–494 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Rojas, N. and Thomas, F., “On closed-form solutions to the position analysis of Baranov trusses,” Mech. Mach. Theory 50, 179–196 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lua, Y., Shi, Y., Huanga, Z., Yub, J., Li, S. and Tiana, X., “Kinematics/statics of a 4-DOF over-constrained parallel manipulator with 3 legs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 44, 1497–1506 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Department of Health, The National Service Framework for Long-Term Conditions (DH, London, 2008).Google Scholar
10.Díaz, I., Gil, J.J and Sánchez, E., “Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: Literature review and challenges,” J. Robot. 2011, 11, (2011).Google Scholar
11.Homma, K., Fukuda, O. and Nagata, Y., “Study of a Wire-Driven Leg Rehabilitation System,” Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan (Sep. 28–Oct. 2, 2004) pp. 1451–1456.Google Scholar
12.Sui, P., Yao, L., Dai, J.S. and Wang, H., “Development and Key Issues of the Ankle Rehabilitation Robots,” Proceedings of the 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, México (Jun. 19–25, 2011) pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
13.Timmermans, A., Seelen, H. A. M., Willmann, R. D. and Kingma, H., “Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: Concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 6, 1 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Teasell, R., Bayona, N. and Salter, K., “Progress in clinical neurosciences: Stroke recovery and rehabilitation,” Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 33 (4), 357–364 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Urton, M. L., Kohia, M., Davis, J. and Neill, M. R., “Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke,” Occup. Ther. Int. 14 (1), 11–27 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Boian, R. F., Burdea, G. C., Deutsch, J. E. and Winter, S. H., “Street Crossing Using a Virtual Environment Mobility Simulator,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation (IWVR 2004), Lausanne, Switzerland (2004) pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
17.Riener, R., Lünenburger, L., Rer, N. and Colombo, G., “Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and assessment,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43 (5), 679–694 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Emken, J. L., Wynne, J. H., Harkema, S. J. and Reinkensmeyer, D. J., “A robotic device for manipulating human stepping,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 22 (1), 185–189 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dai, J. S. and Zhao, T., “Sprained ankle physiotherapy based mechanism synthesis and stiffness analysis of a robotic rehabilitation device,” Auton. Robots 16, 207–218 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Berenson, D., Abbeel, P. and Goldberg, K., “A Robot Path Planning Framework that Learns from Experience,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minnesota, USA (May 14–18, 2012) pp. 3671–3678.Google Scholar
21.Shih, B. Y., Chang, H. and Chen, C. Y, “Path planning for autonomous robots – A comprehensive analysis by a greedy algorithm,” J. Vib. Control 19, 130–142 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Satici, A. C., Erdogan, A. and Patoglu, V., “Design of a Reconfigurable Ankle Rehabilitation Robot and Its Use for the Estimation of the Ankle Impedance,” Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Kyoto, Japan (Jun. 23–26, 2009) pp. 256–264.Google Scholar
23.Vicon Nexus, Available at: http://www.vicon.com/products/nexus.html; accessed on Oct. 10, 2013.Google Scholar
24.Jamshidi, N., Hamidi Esfahani, M., Farzad, A. and Jamshidi, M., “Design and testing of statistical methods to classify the severity of steppage gait based on centre of pressure data,” Med. Hypotheses 79, 334–337 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Stebbins, J., Harrington, M., Thompson, N., Zavatsky, A. and Theologis, T., “Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children,” Gait Posture 23 (4), 401–410 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Vatandas, O. E. and Hacioglu, A., “The Effect of Radius of Joint Location on Workspace Analysis of the 6–6 Stewart Platform Mechanism,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST'09), Istanbul, Turkey (Jun. 11–13, 2009) pp. 728–731.Google Scholar
27.Charters, T., Enguicca, R. and Freitas, P., “The 60th European study group with industry report on the Stewart platform problem,” Math. Ind. Case Stud. 1, 66–80 (2009).Google Scholar