Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:57:07.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parametric excitation-based inverse bending gait generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Yuji Harata ,
Fumihiko Asano ,
Kouichi Taji  and
Yoji Uno
Yuji Harata*
Affiliation:
Division of Mechanical Systems and Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8527, Japan
Fumihiko Asano
Affiliation:
School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1, Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa, 923-1292, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Kouichi Taji
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8603, Japan. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Yoji Uno
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8603, Japan. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a gait generation method based on the parametric excitation principle, appropriate motion of the center of mass restores kinetic energy lost by heel strike. The motion is realized by bending and stretching a swing-leg regardless of bending direction. In this paper, we first show that inverse bending restores more mechanical energy than forward bending, and then propose a parametric excitation-based inverse bending gait for a kneed biped robot, which improves gait efficiency of parametric excitation walking.

Keywords

Parametric excitationDynamic bipedal walkingEnergy restorationForward bendingInverse bending
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , October 2011 , pp. 831 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McGeer, T., “Passive dynamic walking,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 9 (2), 62–82 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Goswami, A., Espiau, B. and Keramane, A., “Limit cycles in a passive compass gait biped and passivity-mimicking control laws,” J. Auton. Robots 4 (3), 273–286 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Asano, F., Yamakita, M. and Furuta, K., “Virtual Passive Dynamic Walking and Energy-Based Control Laws,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, (Oct. 31–Nov. 5, 2000) pp. 1149–1154.Google Scholar
4.Asano, F., Luo, Z.-W. and Hyon, S., “Parametric Excitation Mechanisms for Dynamic Bipedal Walking,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Apr. 18–22, 2005) pp. 611–617.Google Scholar
5.Asano, F. and Luo, Z.-W., “Energy-efficient and high-speed dynamic biped locomotion based on principle of parametric excitation,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 24 (6), 1289–1301 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Asano, F., Hayashi, T., Luo, Z.-W., Hirano, S. and Kato, A., “Parametric Excitation Approaches to Efficient Bipedal Walking,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Oct. 29–Nov. 2, 2007) pp. 2210–2216.Google Scholar
7.Harata, Y., Asano, F., Luo, Z.-W., Taji, K. and Uno, Y., “Biped gait generation based on parametric excitation by knee-joint actuation,” Robotica 27 (07), 1063–1073 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Spong, M. W., “The swing up control for the acrobot,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 15 (2), 49–55 (1995).Google Scholar
9.Lavrovskii, E. K. and Formalskii, A. M., “Optimal control of the pumping and damping of swing,” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 57 (2), 311–320 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Asano, F. and Luo, Z.-W., “The Effect of Semicircular Feet on Energy Dissipation by Heel-Strike in Dynamic Bipedal Locomotion,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Apr. 10–14, 2007) pp. 3976–3981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar