Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:30:23.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new tuning procedure for nonlinear PID global regulators with bounded torques for rigid robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Jorge Orrante-Sakanassi ,
Víctor Santibánez  and
Víctor M. Hernández-Guzmán
Jorge Orrante-Sakanassi
Affiliation:
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de La Laguna, AP 49-1, Torreón, Coah., C.P. 27001, México
Víctor Santibánez*
Affiliation:
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de La Laguna, AP 49-1, Torreón, Coah., C.P. 27001, México
Víctor M. Hernández-Guzmán
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ingeniería, AP 3-24, Querétaro, Qro., C.P. 76150, México
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper we propose new tuning conditions for three saturated nonlinear proportional-integral-derivative (PID) global regulators with bounded torques for robot manipulators, which have been presented previously in the literature. The motivation of this work relies on the fact that the tuning conditions presented previously in the literature for assuring global asymptotic stability are so restrictive that it had been impossible, until now, to carry out experimental tests. New tuning criteria of unsaturated PID controllers for robot manipulators with stability conditions more relaxed than those presented previously in the literature have been proposed recently in some works by the authors. This was achieved by setting the stability conditions as expressions that have to be satisfied at each joint instead of general conditions for the whole robot. Based on this idea, we now obtain stability conditions for saturated global PID controllers which are so relaxed that they have allowed to perform, by the first time, experimental tests using controller gains which completely satisfy the proposed stability conditions. The results of such experiments are presented in this paper, where we have used a two-degrees-of-freedom robot manipulator.

Keywords

Robot manipulatorsSaturated PID controlGlobal asymptotic stabilityTuning conditions
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 33 , Issue 9 , November 2015 , pp. 1926 - 1947
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arimoto, S. and Miyazaki, F., “Stability and Robustness of PID Feedback Control for Robot Manipulators of Sensory Capability,” In: Robotics Researches: First International Symposium (Brady, M. and Paul, R., eds.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1984) pp. 783–799.Google Scholar
2. Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T. and Suzuki, H., “Asymptotic Stability and Robustness of PID Local Feedback for Position Control of Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Automation Robotics and Computer Vision, Singapore (Sep. 1990) pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
3. Kelly, R., “A tuning procedure for stable PID control of robot manipulators,” Robotica 13, 141–148 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Ortega, R., Loria, A. and Kelly, R., “A semiglobally stable output feedback PI2D regulator for robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40, 1432–1436 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Cervantes, I. and Kelly, R., “PID regulation of robot manipulators: Stability and performance,” Syst. Control Lett. 41, 73–83 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Meza, J. L., Santibanez, V. and Campa, R., “An estimate of the domain of attraction for the PID regulator of manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Autom. 22, 187–195 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Hernández-Guzmán, V. M., Santibánez, V. and Silva-Ortigoza, R., “A new tuning procedure for PID control of rigid robots,” Adv. Robot. 22, 1007–1023 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Kelly, R., “Global positioning of robot manipulators via PD control plus a class of nonlinear integral actions,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 43 (7), 141–148 (Jul. 1998).Google Scholar
9. Arimoto, S., “Fundamental problems of robot control – Part I. Innovations in the realm of robot servo-loops,” Robotica 13, 19–22 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Santibañez, V. and Kelly, R., “A Class of Nonlinear PID Global Regulators of Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Lueven, Bélgica (May 16–20, 1998) pp. 3601–3608.Google Scholar
11. Meza, J. L. and Santibañez, V., “Analysis via Passivity Theory of a Class of Nonlinear PID Global Regulators for Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Robotics and Applications RA'99, Santa Barbara, CA, USA (Oct. 28–30, 1999) pp. 288–293.Google Scholar
12. Hernández-Guzmán, V. M. and Silva-Ortigoza, R., “Improving performance of saturation-based PID controllers for rigid robots,” Asian J. Control 13 (2), 295–303 (2011).Google Scholar
13. Sun, D., Hu, S., Shao, X. and Liu, C., “Global stability of a saturated nonlinear PID controller for robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 17, 892–899 (2009).Google Scholar
14. Loria, A., Lefeber, E. and Nijmeijer, H., “Global asymptotic stability of robot manipulators with linear PID and PI2D control,” Stability and Control Theory and Applications 3 (2), 138–149 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Colbaugh, R., Barany, E. and Glass, K., “Global Regulation of Uncertain Manipulators using Bounded Controls,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, USA (Apr. 20–25, 1997) pp. 1148–1155.Google Scholar
16. Colbaugh, R., Barany, E. and Glass, K., “Global Stabilization of Uncertain Manipulators using Bounded Controls,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Albuquerque, USA (Jun. 4–6, 1997) pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
17. Loria, A., Kelly, R., Ortega, R. and Santibanez, V., “On global output feedback regulation of eular-lagrange systems with bounded inputs,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 42, 1138–1143 (1997).Google Scholar
18. Kelly, R. and Santibanez, V., “A Class of Global Regulators with Bounded Control Actions for Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan (Dec. 11–13, 1996) pp. 3382–3387.Google Scholar
19. Santibanez, V. and Kelly, R., “On global regulation of robot manipulators: Saturated linear state feedback and saturated output linear state feedback,” Eur. J. Control 3, 104–113 (1997).Google Scholar
20. Santibanez, V. and Kelly, R., “A new set-point controller with bounded torques for robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 45, 126–133 (1998).Google Scholar
21. Zavala-Rio, A. and Santibanez, V., “Simple extension of the PD-with-gravity-compensation control law for robot manipulators with bounded inputs,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 14, 958–965 (2006).Google Scholar
22. Zavala-Rio, A. and Santibanez, V., “A natural saturating extension of the PD-with-desired-gravity-compensation control law for robot manipulators with bounded inputs,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 23, 386–391 (2007).Google Scholar
23. Zergeroglu, E., Dixon, W., Behal, A. and Dawson, D., “Adaptive set-point control of robotic manipulators with amplitude-limited control inputs,” Robotica 18, 171–181 (2000).Google Scholar
24. Dixon, W. E., “Adaptive Regulation of Amplitude Limited for Robot Manipulators with Uncertain Kinematics and Dynamics,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Boston, USA (Jun. 30–Jul. 2, 2004) pp. 3839–3844.Google Scholar
25. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Kelly, R. and Cervantes, I., “Semiglobal stability of saturated linear PID control for robot manipulator,” Automatica 39, 989–995 (2003).Google Scholar
26. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Santibanez, V. and Campa, R., “Stability of robot manipulators under saturated PID compensation,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 16, 1333–1341 (2008).Google Scholar
27. Gorez, R., “Globally stable PID-like control of mechanical systems,” Syst. Control Lett. 38, 61–72 (1999).Google Scholar
28. Meza, J. L., Santibañez, V. and Hernandez, V., “Saturated Nonlinear PID Global Regulator for Robot Manipulators: Passivity-Based Analysis,” Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic (Jul. 4–8, 2005).Google Scholar
29. Santibanez, V., Parada, P. and Camarillo, K., “An Extension of a Saturated Nonlinear PID Global Regulator for Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IX Mexican Robotic Congress, Monterrey, Mexico (Oct. 24–26, 2007).Google Scholar
30. Santibanez, V., Kelly, R., Zavala-Rio, A. and Parada, P., “A New Saturated Nonlinear PID Global Regulator for Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, South Korea (Jul. 6–11, 2008) pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
31. Yarza, A., Santibanez, V. and Moreno-Valenzuela, J., “Global asymptotic stability of the classical PID controller by considering saturation effects in industrial robots,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 8 (4), 34–42 (2011).Google Scholar
32. Su, Y., Muller, P. and Zheng, C., “Global asymptotic saturated PID control for robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18, 1280–1288 (2010).Google Scholar
33. Santibañez, V., Camarillo, K., Moreno-Valenzuela, J. and Campa, R., “A practical PID regulator with bounded torques for robot manipulators,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 8 (3), 544–555 (2010).Google Scholar
34. Kelly, R., Santibanez, V. and Loria, A., Control of Robot Manipulators in Joint Space (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005).Google Scholar
35. Spong, M., Hutchinson, S. and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Modelling and Control (Wiley, New York, 2005).Google Scholar
36. Orrante-Sakanassi, J., Santibañez, V. and Campa, R., “On Saturated PID Controllers for Industrial Robots: The PA10 Robot Arm as Case of Study,” In: Advanced Strategies for Robot Manipulators (Shafiei, E., ed.) (InTech, 2010), 217–248.Google Scholar
37. Horn, R. A. and Johnson, C. R., Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
38. Kelly, R. and Santibanez, V., Control de Movimiento de Robots Manipuladores (Prentice Hall, Madrid, 2003).Google Scholar
39. Reyes, F. and Kelly, R., “Experimental evaluation of model-based controllers on a direct-drive robot arm,” Mechatronics 11, 267–282 (2001).Google Scholar
40. Hernández-Guzmán, V. M., Carrillo-Serrano, R. V. and Silva-Ortigoza, R., “PD control for robot manipulators actuated by switched reluctance motors,” Int. J. Control 86 (13), 73–83 (2013).Google Scholar