2.1. Environment modeling

Environmental modeling is the prerequisite for the simulation of drones to perform various operations. In our experiment, the grid graph method is used to model the environment and the working environment of the UAV is divided into a series of grid areas of identical size. The schematic diagram of environmental modeling is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of environment modeling.

2.2. Path initialization using a balanced split strategy

In ABC-related algorithms, the employed bee and follower bee strategies are local optimization strategies, whereas the scout bee strategy is a global optimization strategy [Reference Konar, Turkmen and Oktay14]. Each nectar represents a feasible solution of the optimization problem, which is a feasible path composed of an array of path codes in the path planning problem [Reference Aslan15]. The honey source-optimized UAV flight path corresponding to the employed bee, the follower bee, and the scout bee are optimized solutions obtained by three strategies.

In the three-dimensional rectangular coordinate system, each path to be optimized is coded to generate an array. The flight path of the drone is represented by the coordinate points composed of three integers of X, Y, and Z in the coordinate system. The form of the encoding array is a singly linked list of length L. As shown in Fig. 2, L is also the dimension and the number of elements in the path planning IB-ABC algorithm, which is the number of coordinate points in the path. The encoding array is used as the path plan and the nectar source location in the IB-ABC algorithm is used to initialize, and randomly generated SN nectar sources are the SN paths in the path planning IB-ABC algorithm.

Figure 2. Path encoding array singly linked list.

Figure 3. Balanced segmentation strategy.

The initialization of the path adopts a balanced split strategy, and the process is as follows:

Set X_i to denote the UAV flight path (original UAV path) corresponding to the i-th nectar source in the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system space (i = 1, 2, …, SN), so that the number of nectar sources, employed bees, and follower bees are all equal to SN. Connect the start point S and the end point T in the coordinate system to form a line segment ST and then divide it into D ₁ + 1 parts of equal length with D ₁ dashed lines perpendicular to ST {L _kk = 1, 2…, D ₁}. Starting from each choose any point on L _k as the coordinate point of the path, where D ₁ vertical dashed line corresponds to D path points (D ₁=D), connect the D path points on each L _k in turn to form a feasible path from S to T, as shown in Fig. 3. Therefore, the path composed of the coordinates of the corresponding D points is the optimization objective, namely X _i. The specific initialization process of each path point $x_{\mathit{i}}^{j}$ in X _i is shown in Eq. (1).

(1) \begin{equation} x_{i}^{j}=x_{\min }^{j}+\mathit{\varphi }\left(x_{\max }^{j}-x_{\min }^{j}\right) \end{equation}

where $x_{\mathit{i}}^{j}$ represents the j-th element of the i-th feasible solution (j = 1, 2, …, D), that is, the j-th coordinate point in the i-th path. $x_{\max }^{j}$ and $x_{\min }^{j}$ represent the upper part of the j-th coordinate point, represented as a line connecting the square points in Fig. 3. The lower limit D represents the dimension and the number of elements of the feasible solution, that is, the number of coordinate points in the path, and $\varphi$ represents a random number between 0 and 1.

2.3. Fitness function design

The factors closely related to the UAV path include path length and safety [Reference Konar16, Reference Lu, Hu, Xi, Gao and Pun17]. The fitness function in this paper includes route length, airway smoothness, airway concealment, and airway threat.

2.3.1. Route length

The fitness function aims to shorten the path as much as possible. Since the planned path is coded by grid coordinates, the path length is the sum of the path lengths calculated from the ordered coordinate points, as shown in Eq. (2).

(2) \begin{align} f_{a1} & =\sum _{i=1}^{n-1}d\left(P_{i},P_{i+1}\right) \nonumber \\[5pt] d\left(P_{i},P_{i+1}\right) &= \sqrt{(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}+1}-\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}+(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}+1}-\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}+(\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}+1}-\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}})^{\mathit{2}}} \end{align}

where P _i and P _i + 1 are point P _i and point P _i + 1, d(P _i, P _i + 1) is the distance between the i-th and i + 1 points, X _i , Y _i , and Z _i represent the three-dimensional coordinates of point i, X _{i + 1} , Y _{i + 1} , and Z _{i + 1} represent the three-dimensional coordinates of the i + 1 point, and f ₁ is the value of the fitness function of the track length.

2.3.2. Airway smoothness

The fitness function also aims to calculate the smoothness of the trajectory on the decision path. The smoothness can be calculated by two adjacent coordinate points, as shown in Eq. (3).

(3) \begin{align} \mathit{\alpha }_{\mathit{i}} &= \textit{atan}\left[\frac{\left(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{-}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\left(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\mathit{+}\left(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{-}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\left(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\mathit{+}\left(\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{-}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\left(\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Z}_{\mathit{i}}\right)}{\mathit{d}\left(\mathit{P}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{-}\mathit{1}}\mathit{,}\mathit{P}_{\mathit{i}}\right)\mathit{*d}\left(\mathit{P}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{,}\mathit{P}_{\mathit{i}}\right)}\right] \nonumber \\[5pt] f_{a2} &= \sum _{i=2}^{n-1}\left(\pi -\alpha _{i}\right) \end{align}

where $\mathit{\alpha }_{\mathit{i}}$ is the route smoothness of two adjacent coordinate points, atan is the tangent function, X _i, Y _i, and Z _i represent the three-dimensional coordinates of point i, X _{i + 1} , Y _{i + 1} , and Z _{i + 1} represent the three-dimensional coordinates of point i + 1, d(P _i-1, P _i) is the distance between the i-1 and i-th point, d(P _i, P _{i + 1}) is the distance between the i-th and i + 1 point, and f ₂ is the smoothness fitness function value.

2.3.3. Airway concealment

The fitness function is designed to calculate the degree of safety of the decision path. The concealment is related to the flight height of the route and the distance between the route and the obstacle. The safety distance is specified in the coordinate system. When the safety distance is exceeded, the degree of concealment decreases; when the distance is lower than the safety distance, the degree of concealment increases. At the same time, it is proved that the movement has not reached the optimal moving distance, and the degree of concealment will be reduced in the next movement and increases the moving distance. The calculation is shown in Eq. (4).

(4) \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} S_{\mathit{i}}=\left(3*\left(h_{\max }+d_{safe}\right)\right)*\sqrt{(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}\mathit{+}(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}}\\[12pt] S_{j}=\left(Z_{i+1}-d_{safe}\right)*\sqrt{(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}\mathit{+}(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{+}\mathit{1}}\mathit{-}\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}})^{2}}\\[12pt] f_{a3}=\left\{\begin{array}{l} \sum _{i=2}^{n-1}S_{i}, d\left(P_{i},P_{i+1}\right)\lt d_{safe}\\[12pt] \sum _{i=2}^{n-1}S_{j}, d\left(P_{i},P_{i+1}\right)\gt d_{safe} \end{array}\right. \end{array} \end{equation}

where h _max represents the height of the highest point in the environment, d _safe is a preset constant representing the safe distance, X _i , Y _i , and Z _i represent the three-dimensional coordinates of point i, X _{i + 1} , Y _{i + 1} , and Z _{i + 1} represent the three-dimensional coordinates of point i + 1, d(P _i-1, P _i) is the distance between the i−1 and i-th point, d(P _i, P _{i + 1}) is the distance between the i-th and i + 1 points, and S _i , S _j, and f ₃ are all the concealment fitness function values under the corresponding conditions

2.3.4. Airway threat

The fitness function is designed to calculate the threat degree between the decision path and the obstacle. The threat degree is related to the obstacle area that the path passes and the distance between the path and the obstacle center. To simplify the calculation, the obstacle is represented by a sphere. The calculation is shown in Eq. (5).

(5) \begin{align} W_{\mathit{t}}&=\sqrt{\left(X_{i}-X_{t}\right)^{2}+\left(Y_{i}-Y_{t}\right)^{2}\mathit{+}\left(Z_{i}-Z_{t}\right)^{2}}\nonumber \\[5pt] f_{{\mathit{t}_{\mathit{i}}}}&=\left\{\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \sum _{\mathit{t}=1}^{k}W_{t},& W_{t}\lt R_{t}\\[5pt] \mathit{0},& W_{t}\gt R_{t} \end{array}\right.\\[5pt] \mathit{f}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{4}} &= \sum _{t=1}^{\mathit{n}}\mathit{f}_{{t_{\mathit{i}}}},\!\quad\qquad \mathit{t}_{\mathit{i}}\;\mathit{=}\;\mathit{1}, \mathit{2}\,\mathit{.}\mathit{.}\mathit{.}\mathit{,}\,\mathit{n} \nonumber \end{align}

W _t represents the distance from any point (X _i, Y _i, Z _i) on the path to the center point of the obstacle t(X _t, Y _t, Z _t), R _t represents the radius of the obstacle, and f _t represents the threat of the t-th obstacle to the path. k indicates that the current is the k-th obstacle, n is the number of obstacles, and f ₄ is the total threat fitness function value of all n obstacles to the path.

Inspired by ref. [Reference Li, Zhang, Liu and Yang20], a weight is set for the fitness function of each cost. The weight represents the importance of the cost. The weight of each cost can be adjusted according to the actual situation to achieve a better adaptation to the environment. It is found that the overall weight size does not exceed 1 is the most appropriate, that is, Σλ _i = 1. The weight of each cost can be adjusted according to the actual situation to achieve a better adaptation to the environment. According to the target weight method, under the condition of Σλ _i = 1, the value of λ _i can be fixed or random, and we find the appropriate value through continuous experiments. We set the sum of all λ as 1, because few people have mentioned influencing factors other than speed and height, so at the beginning of the test, we can only randomly generate different λ weights for four λ, in order to find a more suitable λ value, and then based on this value to carry out the current test. We ran about a dozen tests and picked the one with the lowest number. Therefore, the calculation for the fitness evaluation function of the path is shown in Eq. (6).

(6) \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} \mathit{f} = \mathit{\lambda }_{\mathit{1}}\mathit{f}_{a1}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{2}\mathit{f}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{2}}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{3}\mathit{f}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{3}}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{4}\mathit{f}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{4}}\\[5pt] \mathit{\lambda }_{1}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{2}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{3}\mathit{+}\mathit{\lambda }_{4}\mathit{=}1 \end{array} \end{equation}

f is the weighted sum of the fitness of the path, and λ_i are the weighting parameters of the four fitness values, where i = 1, 2, 3, 4.

3.1. Single way point employed bee strategy considering feedback information

Employed bee strategy refers to sharing information with a certain flight path code array and randomly selected flight paths through the process of crossover and mutation in order to update the flight path code array represented by the nectar [Reference Sood and Panchal18]. Every time the employed bee strategy is used for optimization, it calls the employed bee to perform a search. The optimization result is the nectar source-optimized UAV flight path corresponding to the employed bee, referred to as the employed bee optimized path.

In this paper, the UAV path optimization process is carried out by considering the internal feedback information Tr (invalid search times) of the iteration. The path information sharing and optimization process is shown in Eq. (7).

(7) \begin{align} X_i^{j{\rm{*}}} &= X_{\rm{i}}^j + \varphi (X_k^j - X_i^j)\mu (i),{\textit{j}} \in \left[ {1,D} \right],k \in \left[ {1,SN} \right] \nonumber \\[7pt] \mu (i) &= \frac{{Tr(i)}}{{Tr(i) + Tr(k)}},Tr \in \left[ {1,D} \right],i \ne k \end{align}

$X_{\mathit{i}}^{j}$ is the j-th element of the i-th original UAV flight path, that is, the j-th coordinate point of the i-th UAV flight path, and $X_{\mathit{i}}^{j\mathit{*}}$ is the corresponding position of the employed bee optimization path optimized by the employed bee strategy. The path point coordinate Tr(i) is a constant, which represents the number of times that the path information is not updated after a round of path information optimization for the honey source X _i , and $\varphi$ is a random number between (−1,1). In this scheme, only a single waypoint $X_{\mathit{k}}^{j}$ is used each time to update the flight path of the UAV to ensure the local search ability. Every time the employed bee conducts a search but does not update the nectar source, Tr increases by 1.

After the employed bee strategy updates the path, the greedy selection strategy is executed to calculate the new nectar source amount, which is the fitness value of the X ^* _i employed bee optimized path obtained by Eq. (7). The fitness value of X ^* _i is compared with the fitness value of X _i . If the path fitness of X ^* _i is less than the fitness value of X _i , the employed bee moves to the new nectar source X ^* _i . The performance is that the optimized path of the employed bee corresponding to X ^* _i replaces the flight path of the UAV corresponding to X _i , and vice versa, where the original UAV flight path X _i is retained.

To sum up, Eq. (7) can guarantee the local search ability of the algorithm.

3.2. Two waypoint following bee strategy considering feedback information

The follower bee strategy refers to selecting a nectar source in a certain way and assigning a follower bee to it. Through the mutation process, a new flight path is searched around the UAV path corresponding to the nectar source [Reference Nayyar, guyen, Kumari and Kumar19]. Each time the follower bee strategy is used for optimization, it is called following the bee to perform a search. The optimization result is to follow the bee’s corresponding nectar source to optimize the flight path of the drone, which is referred to as the follower bee optimization path.

In this paper, the method of directly assigning SN follower bees to the nectar source to search in parallel according to the degree of fitness is used, which is further refined as follows.

The calculation of the fitness value ratio P for each UAV path is shown in Eq. (8).

(8) \begin{align} {P_{\rm{i}}} & = \frac{{fitness(i)}}{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{SN} {fitness(j)} }}\nonumber \\[5pt] fitness(i) & = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \dfrac{1}{{1 + f(i)}}\quad\qquad {\textit{ f}{(\textit{i})}} \ge {\rm{0}}\\[12pt] 1 + abs(f(\textit{i}))\quad\; {\textit{ f}{(\textit{i})}} \le {\rm{0}} \end{array} \right. \end{align}

f(i) represents the fitness function value of the optimized path of the i-th hired bee.

By calculating the fitness value ratio between the original flight path and the flight path of the employed bee retained after each employed bee strategy, all the nectar sources are sorted in descending order of the ratio, and a nectar source is randomly selected in order to allocate it following the bee until each follower bee is assigned a nectar source. In this way, employed bees with a larger fitness ratio can be assigned to follower bees earlier. The flight path of the UAV with better adaptability can prioritize the follower bee strategy to find the optimal path around.

In this article, the employed bee strategy has searched and optimized around the UAV path in Section 3.1. In the follower bee strategy, a larger search range than the employed bee strategy is used to optimize the path in a larger local range. The search method is shown in Eq. (9).

(9) \begin{equation} \begin{array}{c} {X{_{i}^{{j*}}}_{0}} = {X}_{m}^{j}{ + \varphi (X}_{k}^{j}{ - X{_{i}^{j}}_{0}}{)\mu (i)}\\[12pt] {\mu (i)} = \dfrac{{Tr(i)}}{{Tr(i) + Tr(k)}}\\[12pt] {j} \in \left[ {1,D} \right],{m},k \in \left[ {1,SN} \right],Tr \in \left[ {1,D} \right],i \ne k \end{array} \end{equation}

${X_{i}^j}_0$ is the j-th element of the optimized path of the i-th employed bee, ${X_{i}^{j*}}_0$ is the path point corresponding to the position of the optimized path of the follower bee after executing the follower bee strategy, and $\varphi$ is a random number between (−1,1). In this scheme, in order to enhance the ability to search for an optimized flight path in the global scope, two elements $X_{\mathit{m}}^{j}$ and $X_{\mathit{k}}^{j}$ are used to update ${X_{i}^j}_0$ .

After the follower bee strategy, the greedy selection strategy is performed again. If the fitness value of the follower bee optimized path is less than the corresponding employed bee optimized path generated by the employed bee strategy, the corresponding employed bee flight path or the original flight path is deleted, and the follower bee optimized path is kept, which is regarded as moving the corresponding employed bee to the corresponding nectar source following the optimized path of the bee. Otherwise, the optimized path of the employed bee is retained.

To sum up, Eq. (9) can enhance the global search ability of the algorithm and make the algorithm jump out of the local minimum.

3.3. Scout strategy with restrictions

The scout bee strategy refers to that in the iterative process. If a nectar source has gone through the employed bee strategy and the follower bee strategy and has not been updated, the drone path is deleted and a different UAV flight path is randomly generated globally, which then enters the iterative process again for optimization [Reference Li, Zhang, Liu and Yang20]. Each time the scout bee strategy is used to optimize the path, the scout bee replaces the employed bee to search. The optimization result is the nectar-optimized UAV flight path corresponding to the scout bee, referred to as the optimized path of the scout bee. Since this strategy re-generates a different UAV flight path globally, it can effectively avoid the algorithm falling into the local optimal value and increase the global search ability of the algorithm.

Table I. Simulation experiment parameters.

Figure 4. The adaptation curve of the drone group.

In the iterative process, a Tr value is set for the flight path of the drone corresponding to each nectar source (Tr is defined in Eq. (7)), which is initially 0. After an employed bee strategy optimization, if the original drone flight path is not replaced by the employed bee optimization path or the follower bee strategy optimization, the employed bee optimization path and the original drone flight path are not replaced by the follower bee optimization path. Then the Tr value corresponding to the original UAV path is increased by 1. On the contrary, when the original UAV flight path corresponding to the i-th nectar source is replaced by the optimized path of the employed bee, the optimized path of the follower bee, or the optimized path of the employed bee is replaced by the optimized path of the follower bee, the value of corresponding UAV flight path Tr(i) is reset to 1.

After each iteration, any Tr(i) that exceeds the threshold Th (a constant set in advance, used to measure the size of Tr) will be reset to L, instead of directly implementing the scout bee strategy. Before the next iteration, compare the average value $\overline{\mathit{T}}$ of Tr with the size of γ ^* D (γ∈(0,1), which is a given parameter to determine the degree of invalid search and D is the path point in each path. If γ ^* D is small, it means that the effective operation efficiency of the current iterative system is too low, and the overall update needs to be performed. At this time, the scout bee strategy is implemented to delete any number of γ ^* SN drone flight paths, including the original drone flight path that has not been optimized, the optimized path of employed bees and the optimized path of the follower bees, initialize the same number of optimized paths of scout bees, reset the corresponding Tr of γ ^* SN nectar source paths to 1, and enter the next iteration. If γ ^* SN is large, go directly to the next iteration and retain all current drone flight paths, including the initial drone flight path that has not been optimized, the employed bee optimization path, and the follower bee optimization path. Do not generate an optimized path for scout bees. The calculation of $\overline{\mathit{T}}$ value is shown in Eq. (10).

(10) \begin{equation} \overline{\mathit{T}}\mathit{=}\left(1/SN\right)\sum _{i=1}^{SN}Tr\left(i\right) \end{equation}

$\overline{\mathit{T}}$ represents the average Tr of SN honey source paths and Tr(i) represents the number of times that the i-th honey source has gone through a round of path optimization without updating the path information so far.

4.1. Multiple drones depart and arrive at the same time

In order to verify the performance of the IB-ABC algorithm in the UAV path planning problem, the simulation experiment parameters are set as shown in Table I. The limit height is the maximum distance that the UAV can fly. The UAV cannot exceed this height during the flight process. Combined with practical problems, this height is set in the simulation experiment. The four experimental objects are set to UAV1-UAV4, the starting point is set to (75, 135, 400), (60, 450, 350), (450, 145, 250), (400, 400, 350), the end point is set to (250, 250, 550), the IB-ABC algorithm is in the experimental group, and the ABC algorithm, the balanced ABC (B-ABC), and gray wolf algorithm are the control group. Among them, the number of populations in the gray wolf algorithm is 20, and the number of iterations is the same as the ABC-related algorithm. Other related parameters are the same as the ABC-related algorithm. The adaptation curve of each UAV is shown in Fig. 4, and the simulation result is shown in Fig. 6. The average value of 10 random experiments is used to obtain a comparison table of algorithm route data, as shown in Table II.

Table II. Comparison of route data.

Figure 5. Algorithm simulation comparison chart.

From the path optimization convergence curve (Fig. 4(a)–(d)), it can be seen that when the UAV group is required to reach the target location at the same time, the ABC algorithm is due to the imbalance problem of its global and local search capabilities, at the end of each iteration cycle, the detection bee strategy will cause the optimization result to mutate in a larger random direction, causing the planned path to iterate in the direction of deterioration, which is specifically manifested as a sharp increase in the path length, and the sharp increase is greater. The B-ABC algorithm reduces the surge and probability of the planned path after the end of the iteration cycle by using a balanced strategy. The IB-ABC algorithm further reduces the randomness of variation and speeds up the convergence speed by considering the internal information of the iteration. Its convergence speed and path length are also better than the gray wolf algorithm.

Based on the two-dimensional and three-dimensional flight trajectories in Fig. 5(a)–(f), the IB-ABC algorithm has improvement in obstacle avoidance, path smoothness, and path length when compared to the ABC and B-ABC algorithms.

Table III. Simulation experiment parameters.

Figure 6. Adaptation curve of UAV group.

Figure 7. Algorithm simulation comparison chart.

Table II shows that the B-ABC and IB-ABC algorithms shorten the path length by 3% and 10%, respectively, when compared with the ABC algorithm. They also reduce the flight time by 7% and 11%, respectively. Since all UAVs depart and arrive at the same time, each UAV has the same planned time. The speed in the table is the average speed, which is calculated by dividing the total distance by the time.

4.2. Multiple UAVs start at the same time and arrive in sequence

In this group of experiments, the performance simulation experiment parameters that verify the IB-ABC algorithm in the UAV path planning problem are shown in Table III. The limit height is the maximum distance that the UAV can fly. The UAV cannot exceed this height during the flight process. Combined with practical problems, this height is set in the simulation experiment. The experimental subjects are set as four UAVs UAV1–UAV4, the IB-ABC algorithm as the experimental group, and the ABC algorithm and B-ABC algorithm as the control group. The adaptation curve of each UAV is shown in Fig. 6, and the simulation result is shown in Fig. 7. The average value of 10 random experiments is used to obtain a comparison table of algorithm route data, as shown in Table IV.

From the path optimization convergence curve (Fig. 6(a)–(d)), it can be seen that when each individual in the UAV swarm is required to arrive at the destination in a fixed order, the ABC algorithm’s imbalance of its global and local search capabilities is more obvious, the degraded iteration phenomenon has increased significantly, and there is an optimization behavior based on the degraded path, which is specifically manifested as a large, sharp increase in the path length. The B-ABC algorithm reduces the surge and probability of the planned path after the end of the iteration cycle by using a balanced strategy. The IB-ABC algorithm further reduces the randomness of variation and increases the convergence speed by considering the internal information of the iteration. Its convergence speed and path length are also better than the gray wolf algorithm.

From the two-dimensional and three-dimensional flight trajectory figures (Fig. 7(a)–(f)), when each individual in the UAV swarm is required to arrive at the destination in a fixed order, the IB-ABC algorithm has significant improvements in planning paths, path length, and optimization degree when compared to the ABC and B-ABC algorithms.

It can be seen from Table IV that, because the B-ABC algorithm concentrates on improving the balance ability of local and global search, there is little improvement in optimizing path parameters, while the IB-ABC algorithm considers the internal information of the iteration. Compared with the ABC algorithm, the IB-ABC algorithm improves the path length by 7.4%. It should be noted that no matter which algorithm is under the control, the speed of UAV1 is always maintained at 30 m/s, which is normal. The setting requires UAV1 to arrive first, and without a given arrival time, UAV1 flies at the speed limit. The speed in the table is the average speed, which is calculated by dividing the total distance by the time.

Table IV. Comparison of route data.