Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:58:14.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motion planning of strongly controllable stratified systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2015

Ignacy Duleba  and
Michal Opalka
Ignacy Duleba*
Affiliation:
Chair of Cybernetics and Robotics, Electronics Faculty, Wroclaw University of Technology, Janiszewski St. 11/17, 50-372 Wroclaw, Poland
Michal Opalka
Affiliation:
Chair of Cybernetics and Robotics, Electronics Faculty, Wroclaw University of Technology, Janiszewski St. 11/17, 50-372 Wroclaw, Poland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper a motion planner for nonholonomic stratified systems was proposed. Those systems may arise easily when reliable systems are designed to be robust against failures in difficult servicing environments. For a special class of the systems, a strong controllability condition was introduced, and a criterion to satisfy the condition was formulated and used to plan the motion of free-floating space manipulators. Modules of the planner were enumerated and their roles were emphasized. Some features of the planner were examined and discussed based on simulation results performed on two models of space manipulators.

Keywords

Motion planningStratified systemsNonholonomic systemsSpace manipulators
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 10 , October 2016 , pp. 2223 - 2240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. LaValle, S. M., Planning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Goodwine, J., Control of Stratified Systems with Robotic Applications Ph.D. Thesis (Pasadena, California, USA: California Institute of Technology, 1998).Google Scholar
3. Harmati, I., Stratified Motion and Manipulation Planning Algorithms in Robotics Ph.D. Thesis (Budapest, Hungary: Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 2004).Google Scholar
4. Harmati, I., Kiss, B. and Szadeczky-Kardoss, E., “On Drift Neutralization of Stratified Systems,” In: Robot Motion and Control, vol. 335 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (Springer London, London, 2006) pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
5. Chow, W., “Über systeme von linearen partiellen Differentialgleichungen erster Ordnung,” Math. Ann. 1 (117), 98–105 (1939).Google Scholar
6. Dubowsky, S. and Papadopoulos, E., “The kinematics, dynamics, and control of free-flying and free-floating space robotic system,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 531–542 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ellery, A., “Robotic in-orbit servicers – the need for control moment gyroscopes for attitude control,” Aeronaut. J. 108 (1082), 207–214 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Froelich, R. and Papapoff, H., “Reaction wheel attitude control for space vehicles,” IRE Trans. Autom. Control 4 (3), 139–149 (1959).Google Scholar
9. Ellery, A., An Introduction to Space Robotics (Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2000).Google Scholar
10. Opalka, M., Motion Planning of Stratified Systems Ph.D. Thesis (Wroclaw: Wroclaw University of Technology, 2014).Google Scholar
11. Duleba, I., Algorithms of Motion Planning for Nonholonomic Robots (Wroclaw University of Tech. Publishing House, Wrocław, 1998).Google Scholar
12. Rouchon, P., Fliess, M., Levine, J. and Martin, P., “Flatness, Motion Planning and Trailer Systems,” Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 3, San Antonio, TX (1993) pp. 2700–2705.Google Scholar
13. Lafferriere, G. and Sussmann, H., “Motion Planning for Controllable Systems without Drift,” Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, Sacramento, CA (1991) pp. 1148–1153.Google Scholar
14. Murray, R. and Sastry, S., “Nonholonomic motion planning: steering using sinusoids,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contol 38 (5), 700–716 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tchon, K. and Jakubiak, J., “Endogenous configuration space approach to mobile manipulators: A derivation and performance assessment of jacobian inverse kinematics algorithms,” Int. J. Control 26 (14), 1387–1419 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Nakamura, Y., Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization (Addison Wesley, New York, 1991).Google Scholar