Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:26:35.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A method for controlling robotic contact tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Shahram Payandeh
Affiliation:
Experimental Robotics Laboratory (ERL), School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia (Canada) V5A 1S6

Summary

In robotic tasks where the manipulator has to make transition from free space motion to constrained one, there always exists a inevitable impact phase (contact transition phase). Examples can be the autonomous exploratory motion of the end-effector in a cluttered environment, or grasping and manipulation of objects using dexterous mechanical end-effector. A number of controllers have been proposed in the literature with various discussions on their practical implications. In this paper a simple and efficient controller is proposed for the robotic contact tasks. The controller is based on the notion of switching control law where the structure of the controller remains unchanged during the phase transition and only the magnitudes of its gains are changed. The proposed control law maintans the stable performance during the impact phase of the manipulator when making contact with general environment. In addition, the controller exhibits stable and robust performance during the post-contact phase with the desired contact force regulation. The stability of the proposed controller is shown using the Lyapunov method which guarantees the exponential rate of convergence of the state during the contact transition to post-contact phase. Experimental results are presented to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed controller.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kazerooni, H., Waibel, B. and Kim, S., “On the stability of Robot Compliant Motion Control: Theory and Experiments”, Transaction of ASME J. of Dynamics Systems Measurements and Control 112, 417425 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mills, J. and Lokhorst, D., “Control of Robotic Manipulators During General Task Execution: A Discontinuous Control Approach”, Int. J. Robotics Research 12, No. 2. 146163 (04 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hyde, J. and Cutkosky, M., “Contact Transition Control: An Experimental Study”, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics an Automation (1993) pp. 363368.Google Scholar
4. G. Marth, Tarn, T.J. and Bejczy, A.K., Stable Phase Transition Control for Robot Arm Motion, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1993) pp. 355362.Google Scholar
5.Payandeh, S.. Loop gain definition in a Robust Force 288 Robotic contact tasks Control Problem, Proceedings of 1993 American Control Conference (1993), pp. 24992502.Google Scholar
6.Kuo, C.Y. and Wang, S., Nonlinear Robust Hybrid Control of Robotic Manipulators, Transaction of ASME, J. of Dynamics Measurements and Control 112, 4854 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mandal, N. and Payandeh, S., Experimental Evaluation of the Importance of Compliance for Robotic Impact Control, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Control Applications (1993) pp. 511516.Google Scholar
8.Payandeh, S. and Goldenberg, A., A Robust Force Controller: Theory and Experiments, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (1991) pp. 3641.Google Scholar
9.Rugh, W.J., Linear System Theory (Prentice Hall, 1993).Google Scholar
10.Asada, H. and Youcef-Toumi, K., Direct-Drive Robots: Theory and practice (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar