Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:23:10.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Force and Position–Velocity Coordination for Delayed Bilateral Teleoperation of a Mobile Robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2019

E. Slawiñski ,
V. Moya ,
D. Santiago  and
V. Mut
E. Slawiñski*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automática (INAUT), Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
V. Moya
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automática (INAUT), Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
D. Santiago
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automática (INAUT), Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
V. Mut
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automática (INAUT), Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This document proposes a control scheme for delayed bilateral teleoperation of a mobile robot, which it is sought to achieve a coordination of the master device position with the slave mobile robot velocity, and at the same time synchronize the force exerted by the operator with force applied by the environment over the mobile robot. This approach allows the operator to improve the sensitive perception of the remote environment in which the robot navigates while he generates commands to control the mobile robot motion. In this paper, variable and asymmetrical communication time delays are taken into account, as well as a non-passive model of the human operator, for which a novel model is proposed that has a more general structure than the typical ones used to date in the teleoperation field. Furthermore, based on the theoretical analysis presented, the state of convergence in the stationary response is obtained. In addition, an experimental performance evaluation is carried out, where the position–velocity error, force error and the time to complete the task are evaluated. In the tests, a human operator commands a remote mobile robot to push objects of different weight while he perceives the weight of each object through the force feedback system. As an outcome, the theoretical and practical results obtained allow concluding that a satisfactory trade-off between stability and transparency is reached.

Keywords

Bilateral teleoperationForce–velocity coordinationTime delayMobile robot
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 37 , Issue 10 , October 2019 , pp. 1768 - 1784
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sheridan, T. B., Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).Google Scholar
Ferre, M., Buss, M., Aracil, R., Melchiorri, C. and Balaguer, C., Advances in Telerobotics, vol. 31 (Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J.-P., “Time-delay systems: An overview of some recent advances and open problems,” Automatica 39(10), 1667–1694 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipahi, R., Niculescu, S.-I., Abdallah, C. T., Michiels, W. and Gu, K., “Stability and stabilization of systems with time delay,” IEEE Control Syst. 31(1), 38–65 (2011).Google Scholar
Hokayem, P. F. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey,” Automatica 42(12), 2035–2057 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawiñski, E., Mut, V. and Santiago, D., “Pd-like controller for delayed bilateral teleoperation of wheeled robots,” Int. J. Control no. just-accepted, 1–24 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamaei, K., Kim, L. H. and Okamura, A. M., “Design and Evaluation of a Trilateral Shared-control Architecture for Teleoperated Training Robots,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, IEEE, Milan, Italy (2015) pp. 4887–4893.Google Scholar
Santiago, D., Slawiñski, E. and Mut, V., “Delayed trilateral teleoperation of a mobile robot,” Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 1–12 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, L. R., Slawiñski, E. and Mut, V. A., “Kinematic nonlinear controller for a miniature helicopter via lyapunov techniques,” Asian J. Control 16(3), 856–870 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawiñski, E., Santiago, D. and Mut, V., “Control for delayed bilateral teleoperation of a quadrotor,” ISA Trans. 71(2), 415–425 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 34(5), 494–501 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeyer, G. and Slotine, J.-J., “Stable adaptive teleoperation,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 16(1), 152–162 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Ding, L., Gao, H. and Tavakoli, M., “Haptic tele-driving of wheeled mobile robots under nonideal wheel rolling, kinematic control and communication time delay,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 99, 1–12 (2018).Google Scholar
Cho, H. C. and Park, J. H., “Stable bilateral teleoperation under a time delay using a robust impedance control,” Mechatronics 15(5), 611–625 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuño, E., Ortega, R., Barabanov, N. and Basanez, L., “A globally stable PD controller for bilateral teleoperators,” IEEE Trans. Rob. 24(3), 753–758 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, C.-C. and Liu, X. P., “Delay-dependent stability criteria of teleoperation systems with asymmetric time-varying delays,” IEEE Trans. Rob. 26(5), 925–932 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuño, E., Basañez, L. and Ortega, R., “Passivity-based control for bilateral teleoperation: A tutorial,” Automatica 47(3), 485–495 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Ding, L., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Gao, H. and Tavakoli, M., “Kinematic bilateral teledriving of wheeled mobile robots coupled with slippage,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(3), 2147–2157 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Yin, Y. and Zhang, D., “Adaptive task-space synchronization control of bilateral teleoperation systems with uncertain parameters and communication delays,” IEEE Access 6, 5740–5748 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, S., Liu, X. P. and El Saddik, A., “Teleoperation systems with symmetric and unsymmetric time varying communication delay,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 62(11), 2943–2953 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. A., “Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 9(5), 624–637 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, E., Mut, V. A., Fiorini, P. and Salinas, L. R., “Quantitative absolute transparency for bilateral teleoperation of mobile robots,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A Syst. Hum. 42(2), 430–442 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. and Salcudean, S. E., “Transparency in time-delayed systems and the effect of local force feedback for transparent teleoperation,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Automat. 18(1), 108–114 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. and Salcudean, S. E., “Bilateral parallel force/position teleoperation control,” J. Field Robot. 19(4), 155–167 (2002).Google Scholar
Hashemzadeh, F. and Tavakoli, M., “Position and force tracking in nonlinear teleoperation systems under varying delays,” Robotica 33(4), 1003–1016 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadi, K., Talebi, H. and Zareinejad, M., “A novel position and force coordination approach in four channel nonlinear teleoperation,” Comput. Electr. Eng. 56, 688–699 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, R. and Schreckenghost, D., “Survey of Metrics for Human-robot Interaction,” Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, IEEE Press (2013) pp. 197–198.Google Scholar
Lee, D., Martinez-Palafox, O. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral Teleoperation of a Wheeled Mobile Robot Over Delayed Communication Network,” Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA (2006) pp. 3298–3303.Google Scholar
Salinas, L. R., Santiago, D., Slawiñski, E., Mut, V. A., Chavez, D., Leica, P. and Camacho, O., “P+d plus sliding mode control for bilateral teleoperation of a mobile robot,” Int. J. Control Automa. Syst. 16(4), 1927–1937 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawiñski, E., Postigo, J. F. and Mut, V., “Bilateral teleoperation through the internet,” Rob. Auton. Syst. 55(3), 205–215 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar