Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:53:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of head and tail as swinging appendages on the dynamic walking performance of a quadruped robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

Xiuli Zhang ,
Jiaqing Gong  and
Yanan Yao
Xiuli Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
Jiaqing Gong
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
Yanan Yao
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We designed a quadruped robot with a one-degree-of-freedom (1-DOF)-pitch head, a 1-DOF-roll tail, and 14 active DOFs in total, which are controlled via a central pattern generator (CPG) based on a Hopf oscillator. Head and tail movements are coupled to the leg movements with fixed phase differences. Experiments show that tail swinging in roll can equilibrate feet–ground reaction forces (GRF), reducing yaw errors and enabling the robot to maintain its direction when trotting. Head swing in pitch has the potential to increase flight time and stride length of the swinging legs and increase the robot's forward velocity when running in bounds.

Keywords

Quadruped robotSwinging appendageRhythmic motionBiologically inspiredCentral pattern generator
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 12 , December 2016 , pp. 2878 - 2891
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hickman, G., “The mammalian tail: A review of functions,” Mamm. Rev. 9 (4), 143–157 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Jusufi, A., Goldman, D. I., Revzen, S. and Full, R. J., “Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4215–4219 (2008).Google Scholar
3. Jusufi, A., Kawano, D.T., Libby, T., Full, R. J., “Righting and turning in mid-air using appendage inertia: reptile tails, analytical models and bio-inspired robots” Bioinspir. Biomim. 5, 045001 (2010).Google Scholar
4. Jusufi, A., Zeng, Y., Full, R. J. and Dudley, R., “Aerial righting reflexes in flightless animals,” Integr. Comp. Biol. 51, 937–943 (2011).Google Scholar
5. Libby, T., Moore, T., Chang-Siu, E., Li, D., Cohen, D., Jusufi, A. and Full, R., “Tail-assisted pitch control in lizards, robots and dinosaurs,” Nature 481 (7380), 181–184 (2012).Google Scholar
6. Chang-Siu, E., Libby, T., Tomizuka, M. et al., “A Lizard-Inspired Active Tail Enables Rapid Maneuvers and Dynamic Stabilization in a Terrestrial Robot,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA (Sep. 25–30, 2011) pp. 1887–1894.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, A. M., Libby, T., Chang-Siu, E. et al. “Tail Assisted Dynamic Self-Righting,” Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, Sage Publications Ltd, London, England (2012) pp. 611–620.Google Scholar
8. Attenborough, D., “The life of mammals: the complete series,” BBC Episode 5: meat eaters (2002–2003).Google Scholar
9. Walker, C., “Balance in the cat: Role of the tail and effects of sacrocaudal transection,” Behav. Brain Res. 91, 41–47 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Briggs, R., Lee, J. and Haberland, M., “Tails in biomimetic design: Analysis, simulation, and experiment,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal (2012) pp. 1473–1480.Google Scholar
11. Patel, A. and Braae, M., “Rapid turning at high-speed: Inspirations from the cheetah's tail,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, Tokyo, Japan (2013) pp. 5506–5511.Google Scholar
12. Patel, A. and Braae, M., “Rapid acceleration and braking: Inspirations from the cheetah's tail,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation, 2014 IEEE International Conference on, Hong Kong, China (2014) pp. 793–799.Google Scholar
13. Proske, U., “Energy conservation by elastic storage in kangaroos,” Endeavour 4 (4), 148–153 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Zeglin, G. J., Uniroo-a One Legged Dynamic Hopping Robot (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1991).Google Scholar
15. Liu, G. H., Lin, H. Y. et al., “Design of a kangaroo robot with dynamic jogging locomotion,” Proceedings of the System Integration, 2013 IEEE/SICE International Symposium, Kobe, Japan (2013) pp. 306–311.Google Scholar
16. Pijnappels, M., “Armed against falls: The contribution of arm movements to balance recovery after tripping,” Exp. Brain Res. 201, 689–699 (2010).Google Scholar
17. Roos, P. E., “The role of arm movement in early trip recovery in younger and older adults,” Gait Posture 27, 352–356 (2008).Google Scholar
18. Dr. Guero's Amazing Tightrope Walking Robot (Video). http://www.robots-dreams.com/2012/10/dr-gueros-amazing-tightrope-walking-robot-video.html. Oct.19, 2012.Google Scholar
19. Karakasiliotis, K., Schilling, N., Cabelguen, J.-M. et al., “Where are we in understanding salamander locomotion: Biological and robotic perspectives on kinematics,” Biol. Cybern. 107, 529–544 (2013).Google Scholar
20. Schilling, M., Hoinville, T., Schmitz, J. et al., “Walknet, a bio-inspired controller for hexapod walking,” Biol. Cybern. 107 (4), 397–419 (2013).Google Scholar
21. Schilling, M., Paskarbeit, J., Hoinville, T. et al., “A hexapod walker using a hierarchical architecture for action selection,” Front. Comput. Neurosc. 7–126, 1–17 (2013).Google Scholar
22. Necker, R., “Head-bobbing of walking birds,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 193, 1177–1183 (2007).Google Scholar
23. Fujita, M., “Head-bobbing and non-bobbing walking of black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus),” J. Comp. Physiol. A 192 (5), 481–488 (2006).Google Scholar
24. Nyakatura, J. A. and Andrada, E., “On vision in birds: Coordination of head-bobbing and gait stabilises vertical head position in quail,” Front. Zool. 11 (27) (2014).Google Scholar
25. Santos, C., Oliveira, M., Rocha, A. et al., “Head Motion Stabilization During Quadruped Robot Locomotion: Combining Dynamical Systems and a Genetic Algorithm,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation, IEEE International Conference on, Kobe, Japan (2009) pp. 2294–2299.Google Scholar
26. Mederreg, L., Hugel, V. and Bonnin, P., “The RoboCoq Project - Modelling and Design of Bird-Like Robot Equipped with Stabilized Vision,” In: Climbing and Walking Robots: and Their Supporting Technologies (Muscato, G. and Longo, D., eds.) 6th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, Professional Engineering, Bury St Edmunds, UK (2003) pp. 761–768.Google Scholar
27. Ijspeert, A. J., “Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review,” Neural. Netw. 21, 642–653 (2008).Google Scholar
28. Pearson, K., Ekeberg, O. and Bueschges, A., “Assessing sensory function in locomotor systems using neuro-mechanical simulations,” Trends. Neurosci. 29 (11), 625–631 (2006).Google Scholar
29. Cruse, H., Duerr, V. and Schmitz, J., “Insect walking is based on a decentralized architecture revealing a simple and robust controller,” Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 365 (1850), 221–250 (2007).Google Scholar
30. Ijspeert, A. J., Crespi, A., Ryczko, D. et al., “From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model,” Science 315 (5817), 1416–1420 (2007).Google Scholar
31. Wang, T., Hu, Y. and Liang, J., “Learning to swim: A dynamical systems approach to mimicking fish swimming with CPG,” Robotica 31, 361–369 (2013).Google Scholar
32. Kimura, H., Fukuoka, Y. and Cohen, A. H., “Adaptive dynamic walking of a quadruped robot on natural ground based on biological concepts,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 26 (5), 475–490 (2007).Google Scholar
33. Matos, V., Santos, C. P. and Pinto, C. M. A., “A Brainstem-Like Modulation Approach for Gait Transition in a Quadruped Robot,” Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, St Louis, Missouri, USA (2009) pp. 2665–2670.Google Scholar
34. Hudson, P. E.. Cheetah vs Greyhound - World's Fastest Dog in Super Slow Motion. BBC, Earth Unplugged-Slo Mo #29. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jc8Hno4M0Qs. Aug. 22, 2013.Google Scholar
35. Walton, C.. Preakness 2014 Horse Race VIDEO - California Chrome - HD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLGZbeC1kzc. May 17, 2014.Google Scholar

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 1

Download Zhang supplementary material(Video)
Video 2.1 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 2

Download Zhang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 39.3 KB

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 3

Download Zhang supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.6 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 4

Download Zhang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 39.5 KB

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 5

Download Zhang supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.6 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 6

Download Zhang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 39 KB

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 7

Download Zhang supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Zhang supplementary material

Zhang supplementary material 8

Download Zhang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 39 KB