Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:12:06.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and simulation of control systems of an inverted pendulum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Qing Feng  and
Kazuo Yamafuji
Qing Feng
Affiliation:
University of Electro-communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka Chofu Tokyo 182 (Japan)
Kazuo Yamafuji
Affiliation:
University of Electro-communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka Chofu Tokyo 182 (Japan)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This is a preliminary study to provide useful information for the design of the control of a monocycle which is one of the intelligent movable robots. In this paper, the two-degree-of-freedom monocycle is modeled by an inverted pendulum with a controlling arm pivoted at its upper end. The controlling arm is rotated to give the pendulum restoring moment.

The feedback control systems for the model have been designed using two methods – the pole assignment and the optimal control, respectively. Simulations of the control systems designed with the above methods are carried out on a personal computer. Although the pendulum can be stabilized with either of these methods, it is found that the optimal control method is superior to the pole assignment one, because in the former the control system can be designed to be suitably corresponding to the design demands based on a definite criterion.

Keywords

Inverted PendulumDesign of Control SystemsPole Assignment MethodOptimal Control MethodSimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 235 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Golliday, C.L. and Hemami, H. “Postural Stability of the Two-Degree-of-Freedom Biped by General Linear Feed back” IEEE Trans. Aut. Cont.. AC-21, 74–79 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mori, S., Nishihara, H. and Furuta, K. “Control of unstable mechanical system; Control of pendulum” Int. J. Control, 23, No. 5, 673–692 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hayashi, S., Kanoh, H. and Masubuchi, M. “Postural control of An Inverted Pendulum (in Japanese)” Trans. SICE 13, No. 5, 425–432 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gilbert, E. “Controllability and Observability in Multivariable Control System” J. SIAM. Control, 1, No. 2, 128–151 (1963).Google Scholar
5.Wonham, W.M. “On Pole Assignment in Multi-input Controllable Linear System” IEEE Trans. Aut. Cont. AC-12, 660–665 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kleinman, D.L. “On an Iterative Technique for Riccati Equation Computation IEEE Trans. Aut. Cont. AC-13, 114–115 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Uchiyama, T. et al. “Development of a precision multi-articulated robot” Preprint for the Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 584–596 (1982).Google Scholar