Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:42:51.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Intelligence: building birds out of beer cans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Masoud Yazdani  and
Blay Whitby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

John Searle's attack on various interpretations of Artificial Intelligence has been the most thorough challenge to the philosophical foundations of Artificial Intelligence. In this paper we attempt to contribute to a growing body of argument as to why Searle is mistaken in his attack. We propose an analogy between intelligent objects and flying objects, leading to a definition of Artificial Intelligence similar to that of aerodynamics, but one which attempts to present general laws of intelligence in man and machines alike.

Keywords

ArtificialIntelligenceGeneral LawsManMachines
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 89 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Searle, J., ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3, 417–457 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sloman, A., ‘Strong, Strong and Weak Strong AI’ Cognitive Studies Programme (University of Sussex, Brighton, 1985).Google Scholar
3.Searle, J., Minds, Brains and Science: the 1984 Reith Lectures (BBC Publications, London, 1984).Google Scholar
4.Kay, A., ‘Computer Software’ Scientific American 251 (3), 41–47 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Feldman, J.A. and Ballard, D.H., ‘Connectionist models and their properties’ Cognitive Science. 6, 205–254 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar