Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:37:52.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some econometric evidence contradictory to the received wisdom on health and religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2001

SAMUEL CAMERON
Affiliation:
Development and Project Planning Centre, University of Bradford, Pemberton Building, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
Get access

Abstract

It is not uncommon for the invading economist to arrive at radically different conclusions in areas of social inquiry, hitherto left to specialists from other fields. For example, before the arrival of Chicagoan economics, the received wisdom in the criminological field was that deterrent punishments (especially capital punishment) did not work. In this paper, we attend to the simple question: ‘Is religion a beneficial influence on the health of individuals?’ This has not hitherto attracted much attention from economists. However, epidemiological studies have overwhelmingly concluded that the answer to the above question is ‘yes'. In the context of a simple two equation recursive set up, this paper provides sharply contrasting evidence of there being no relationship between the two variables except where an arbitrary five point measure of subjective health status is used. Although the relationship in this case is negative in accordance with the received wisdom, its magnitude is so small that it may be dismissed as inconsequential for reasons discussed in the main body of the paper. This paper deals solely with physical health unlike some of the prior research which also investigates mental health status.

Type
Technical article
Copyright
© 2000 Risk Decision and Policy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)