Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:26:12.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative risk estimates relative to the average peer predict behavioral intentions and concern about absolute risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2002

WILLIAM M.P. KLEIN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901, USA. Tel: (207) 872–3183. Fax: (207) 872–3096. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study explored whether comparisons of one's perceived absolute risk of being overweight to that of other people are predictive of concern about one's risk and intentions to reduce it. One hundred and six North American college students rated their absolute risk, concern, and intentions, and compared their risk with that of several comparison referents including average targets (e.g., ‘the average same-sex student in the US’), single targets (e.g., ‘best friend’), temporal targets (e.g., ‘yourself a few years ago’), and exemplar targets (e.g., ‘prototypical person with weight problem’). Participants showed high concern and intentions when comparing unfavorably with many of the average targets, even when controlling for absolute risk. Comparisons with single targets were generally related to concern, though not to intentions. Temporal and exemplar comparisons were unrelated to concern and intentions. Comparative risk (particularly with average targets) may elicit worry about one's risk and encourage protective measures, irrespective of one's absolute risk.

Type
Technical Paper
Copyright
© Risk Decision and Policy, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)