Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:55:35.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Producción en masa del azúcar cubano, 1899–1929: Economías de escala y elección de técnicas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2010

Alan Dye
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Abstract

Technological changes gave Cuba one of the most technically advanced cane sugar industries in the world in the first part of this century. In this paper, we show quantitatively that production techniques in sugar manufacturing, as in many other processing industries, underwent enormous increases in their optimal scales due to the adoption of continuous-processing technologies and mass production. These same continuous-processing technologies were those which heralded the managerial revolution à la Chandler. In Cuba, the large turn-of-the-century sugar enterprise, to take a global perspective, was not the latifundio of antiquity; it was an element of the large industrial enterprise of the twentieth century, and it was a mark of global participation and industrial leadership in the newly transformed techniques of sugar manufacture.

Resumen

Ciertos cambios tecnológicos dotaron a Cuba de una de las industrias azucareras más avanzadas del mundo en la primera mitad del presente siglo. En este trabajo mostramos cuantitativamente que las técnicas de producción en la fabricación de azúcar, como en muchas otras industrias de elaboración, experimentaron enormes incrementos en sus escalas óptimas debido a la adopción de tecnologías de proceso continuo y de producción en masa. En Estados Unidos estas mismas tecnologías de proceso continuo fueron las que anunciaron la revolución en la gestión administrativa al estilo Chandler. En Cuba, la gran fábrica azucarera de comienzo de siglo, para adoptar una perspectiva global, no era el latifundio de antaño; era un elemento de la gran empresa industrial del siglo XX, e indicaba participación global y liderazgo industrial en las técnicas recientemente transformadas de fabricación del azúcar.

Type
Artículos
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Albert, B., y Graves, A. (eck) (1988): The World Sugar Economy in War and Depression, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergad, L. W. (1990): Cuban Rural Society in the Nineteenth Century: the Social and Economic History of Monoculture in Matanzas, Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bernal, A. M. (1988): Economía e Historia de los Latifundios, Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. M. (1915): Java: Past and Present, 2 vols., London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Castillo Del, J. (1985): «The Formation of the Dominican Sugar Industry: From Competition to Monopoly, from National Semiproletariat to Foreign Proletariat», en Fraginals, Manuel Moreno, Pons, Frank Moya y Engerman, Stanley (eds.): Between Slavery and Free Labor: The Spanish-Speaking Caribbean in the Nineteenth Century, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. (1972): «Anthracite Coal and the Beginnings of the Industrial Revolution in the United States», Business History Review, 46, 141–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. (1977): The Visible Hand, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of the Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. (1990): Scale and Scope, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of the Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. (1984): «Technological Change as Historical Process: The Case of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry, 1915–1940», Journal of Economic History, 44, 775–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. (1987): «Factor Substitution and Induced Innovation in North American Draft Pulping: 1914–1940», Explorations in Economic History, 24, 197219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuba, República de, Secretaría de Agricultura, Comercio y Trabajo, (1916/19171930): Industria Azucarera, Memoria de la Zafra, Annual series, La Habana, Imprenta y Papelería de Rambla, Bouza y Ca.Google Scholar
Cuba, República de, Secretaría de Agricultura, Comercio y Trabajo, Secretaría de Hacienda (1903/19041929): Industria Azucarera y sus Derivados, serie anual, La Habana, Imprenta Mercantil; P. Fernández y Ca.; Imp. y Lit. «Habanera»; Imprenta y Papelería «La Propagandista»; Montalvo y Cárdenas; Imp. Carasa y Ca.; Fernández Solana y Cía.; Tipos Molina y Cía.Google Scholar
Czarnikow-Rionda, (1930): Czarnikow-Rionda Annual Sugar Review.Google Scholar
David, P. (1975): Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
David, P. (1989): «Computer and Dynamo: the Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-too-Distant-Mirror», Stanford University, CEPR Publication núm. 172.Google Scholar
Deerr, N. (1911): Cane Sugar: A Textbook on the Agriculture of the Sugar Cane, the Manufacture of Cane Sugar, and the Analysis of Sugar House Products, Manchester, Norman Rodger.Google Scholar
Deerr, N. (1950): History of Sugar, 2 vols., London, Chapman and Hall, Ltd.Google Scholar
Denslow, D. (1987): Sugar Production in Northeastern Brazil and Cuba, 1858–1908, South American and Latin Economic History series, Bruchey, Stuart y Klein, Herbert (eds.), Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Dye, A. (1991): Tropical Technology and Mass Production: the Expansion of Cuban Sugarmills, 1899–1930, tesis doctoral inédita, University of Illinois at Urbana-Cham-paign.Google Scholar
Dye, A. (1992): «Cane Contracting and Renegotiation: A Fixed Effects Analysis of the Adoption of New Sugar Technologies in the Cuban Sugar Industry, 1899–1929», Explorations in Economic History (en prensa).Google Scholar
Eichner, A. S. (1969): The Emergence of Oligopoly: Sugar Refining as a Case Study, Baltimore, Maryland, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, S. (1983): «Contract Labor, Sugar and Technology in the Nineteenth Century», Journal of Economic History, 43, 635–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fao (1971): The World Sugar Economy in Figures, 1880–1959, Commodity Reference Series, no. 1.Google Scholar
Ferrara, O. (1915): Anuario Estadístico de la República de Cuba, La Habana, Imprenta «El Siglo XX».Google Scholar
Guerra, Y Sánchez, R. (1944): Azúcar y población en las Antillas, 3.a ed., La Habana, Cultural.Google Scholar
Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association (1921): The Sugar Industry of Hawaii and the Labor Shortage, compilado por la Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association.Google Scholar
Hoernel, R. B. (1976): «Sugar and Social Change in Oriente, Cuba, 1898–1946», Journal of Latin American Studies, 8, 215–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, L. C. (1985): A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1780–1930, 2 vols., Charlottesville, Univ. of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Jenks, L. H.: Our Cuban Colony, New York, Vanguard Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. (1972): «The Origins and Early Development of Cane Farming in Trinidad», Journal of Caribbean History, 5, 4673.Google Scholar
Leon, J. A. (1848): On Sugar Cultivation in Louisiana, Cuba, &c., and the British Possessions, Londonm P.Oliver.Google Scholar
Luzóon, J. L. (1987): Economía, Pobhción y Territorio en Cuba (1899–1983), Madrid, Ediciones Cultura Hispánica, Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Martín, Rodríguez (1982): Azúcar y Decolonización: Origen y Desenlace de una Crisis Agraria en la Vega de Granada. El «Ingenio de San Juan», 1882–1904, Universidad de Granada, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional.Google Scholar
Maxwell, F. (1927): Economic Aspects of Cane Cultivation, London, Norman Rodger.Google Scholar
Meade, G. P., y Chen, J. P. (1977): Cane Sugar Handbook, 10.a ed., New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, M. (1978): El Ingenio: El Complejo Económico Social Cubano del Azúcar, La Habana, Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, M. (1983): «Plantaciones en el Caribe: el Caso Cuba-Puerto Rico-Santo Domingo (1860–1940)», en Fraginals, Moreno, La Historia como Arma, y otros estudios sobre esclavos, ingenios y plantaciones, Editorial Crítica, Grupo Editorial Grijalbo, 1983.Google Scholar
Moreno Fraginals, M. (1986): «Plantation Economies and Societies in the Spanish Caribbean, 1860–1930», en Bethell, Leslie (ed.), The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. 4, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mowery, D., y Rosenberg, N. (1989): Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth, Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuwer, M. (1988): «From Batch to Flow: Production Technology and Work-Force Skills in the Steel Industry, 1880–1920», Technology and Culture, 29, 808–38.Google Scholar
Pérez, L. A. Jr, (1986): Cuba Under the Platt Amendment, 1902–1934, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, L. A. Jr, (1988): Cuba: Between Reform and Revolution, Oxford Univ. Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pérez, L. A. Jr, (1990): Cuba and the United States, Singular Ties of intimacy, Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Pezuela De La, J. (1863): Diccionario Geográfico, Estadístico e Histórico de la Isla de Cuba, Madrid, Imprenta del Establecimiento de Mellado.Google Scholar
Prinsen Geerligs, H. C. (1917): Chemical Control in Cane Sugar Factories, 2.a ed., London, Norman Rodger.Google Scholar
Prinsen Geerligs, H. C. (1924): Cane Sugar and its Manufacture, 2.a ed., London, Norman Rodger.Google Scholar
Prinsen Geerligs, H. C.; Licht, Messrs F. O., y Mikusch, Gustav (1929): Sugar. Memorandum prepared for the Economic Committee, Liga de Naciones, Comité Económico.Google Scholar
Ramos Mattéi, A. (1984): «The Growth of the Puerto Rican Sugar Industry Under North American Domination: 1899–1910», en Albert, Bill y Adrian, Graves (eds.), Crisis and Change in the International Sugar Economy 1860–1914, Norwich and Edinburgh: ISC Press.Google Scholar
Riverend, Julio Le (1971): Historia Económica de Cuba, 2 vols., La Habana, Instituto Cubano del Libro.Google Scholar
Robertson, C. (1934): World Sugar Production and Consumption, London, John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd. Chs. 2, 4.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (1984): «The Transformation of Sugar Production in Cuba After Emancipation», en Albert, Bill and Graves, Adrian (eds.), Crisis and Change in the International Sugar Economy 1860–1914, Norwich and Edinburgh, ISC Press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (1985): Slave Emancipation in Cuba, Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shlomowitz, R. (1979): «The Search for Institutional Equilibrium in Queensland's Sugar Industry, 1884–1913», Australian Economic History Review, 19, 91122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shlomowitz, R. (1984): «Plantations and Smallholdings: Comparative Perspectives from the World Cotton and Sugar Cane Economies, 1865–1939», Agricultural History, 58, 116.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. (1931): The Tariff History of the United States, 8.a ed., serie Reprints in Economic Classics. Reeditado, New York, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers. Original, 8.a ed., New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (18901930): Wholesale Prices and Price Indexes, Washington D.C., Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
U. S. Tariff Commission (1926): Sugar. Report of the United States Tariff Commission to the President… Washington D.C., Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Willett, Y Gray, (1911, 1930, 1940): Willett and Gray's Weekly Statistical Sugar Trade Journal.Google Scholar
Williamson, H., y Daum, A. (1959): The American Petroleum Industry, Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York, Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wright, P. G. (1924): Sugar in Relation to the Tariff, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Zanetti Lecuona, O., y García Alvarez, A. (1987): Caminos para el Azúcar, La Habana, Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Zanetti Lecuona, O., y García Alvarez, A. (eds.) (1976): United Fruit Company: un caso del dominio imperialista en Cuba, La Habana, Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar