No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
El patrón comercial a finales del siglo XIX: Un análisis comparativo
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2010
Abstract
This paper will focus on the question does the Heckscher-Ohlin theory adequately account for the major aspects of the trade pattern observed prior to WWI, or are there other influences that mattered? I conclude mat although the perfect competition H-O model does not do all that well for the post-world War II period, it is perfectly adequate for die late nineteenth century, the period which motivated Eli F. Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin in the first place.
Resumen
En este ensayo se contrasta para una muestra de 18 países hacia 1913 una versión estàtica de la teoría de Heckscher-Ohlin, en la formulación de Vanek. La conclusión alcanzada es que si bien el modelo de H-O con competencia perfecta no resulta plenamente explicativo para la segunda posguerra mundial, es muy adecuado, sin embargo, para los años finales del siglo xix y primeros del siglo xx.
- Type
- Artículos
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 1994
References
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Abel, J. E., y Bond, N. J. (1929): Illiteracy in Several Countries of the World, United States Bureau of Education.Google Scholar
Adelman, L., y Morris, C. T. (1984): Comparative Patterns of Economic Development 1850–1914, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C. (1979): «International Competition in Iron and Stell, 1850–1913», Journal of Economic History, vol. 39, pp. 911–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairoch, P. (1989): «European Trade Policy, 1815–1914», pp. 1–160 en Mathias, P. y Pollard, S. (comps.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, vol. III.Google Scholar
Balassa, B. (1965): «Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage», The Manchester School, vol. 33, pp. 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board of Governors of the Federal System (1943): Banking and Monetary Statistics 1914–1941, septiembre, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. P. (1983): «Changes in the International Distribution of Resources and their Impact on U. S. Comparative Advantage», Review of Economic and Statistics, vol. LXV, pp. 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, A. (comp.) (1989): Estadísticas Históricas de España, siglo xix–xx, Madrid, Fundación Banco Exterior.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E.; Frankel, J. A. y Jones, R. W. (1990): World Trade and Payments, Harper Collins Publishers, 5a ed.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C. M. (1969): Literacy and Development in the West, apéndice estadístico, Londres, Pinguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. (1989): «Revealed Comparative Advantage in Manufacturing, 1899–1950», Journal of European Economic History, vol. 18, núm. 1, pp. 127–137.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., y Thomas, M. (1986): «Comparative Advantage in UK Manufacturing Trade, 1910–1935», The Economic Journal, vol. 96, pp. 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmstadter, J. (1971): Energy in the World Economy, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Deardorff, A. V. (1984): «Testing Theories and Predicting Trade Flows», en Jones, R. W. y Kenen, P. B. (comps.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. I, pp. 467–517, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Department of Mines (1913): Preliminary Report on the Mineral Production of Canada during the CalendarYear 1912, Ottawa, Goverment Printing Bureau.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K., y Norman, V. D. (1980): Theory of International Trade, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1926): Illiteracy and School Attendance in Canada, Ottawa, capítulo 3.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. (1992): «Comparative Advantaje at the Turn of the Century», Cambridge, Department of Economics, Harvard University, multicopiado.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. (1993a): «The Evolution of Comparative Advantage from 1913 to 1938», Cam bridge, Department of Economics, Harvard University, multicopiado.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. (1993b):, «Measuring Trade Openness in the Late Nineteenth Century: A HeckscherOhlin Approach», Cambridge, Department of Economics, Harvard University, multicopiado.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, G. L., y Modlin, M. J. (1986): Direct-Line Distances. International Edition, Metuchen, The Scarecrow Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Flam, H., y Flanders, M. J. (comps.) (1991): Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, Cambridge, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fraile, P. (1992): «Los mercados del centro y las economías atrasadas de Europa 1900–1930», en Prados de la Escosura, L. y Zamagni, V. (eds.), El desarrollo económico en la Europa del Sur: España e Italia en perspectiva histórica, Madrid, Alianza Universidad, pp. 253–268.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G. (1959): «Industrial Capital Stocks and Energy Consumption», The Economic Journal, vol. LXIX, pp. 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawke, G. R. (1975): «The United States Tariff and Industrial Protection in the Late Nineteenth Century», Economic History Review, núm. 28, pp. 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjerppe, R., y Pihkala, E. (1977): «The Gross Domestic Product of Finland in 1860–1913. A preliminary estimate», Economy and History, vol. XX, núm. 2, pp. 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEERAL (Instituto de Estudios Económicos sobre la Realidad Argentina y Latinoamericana) (1986): «Estadísticas de la evolución económica argentina 1913–1984», Estudios, núm. 9, julio/septiembre, pp. 103–184.Google Scholar
Lains, P. (1989): «Foreign Trade and Economic Growth in the European Periphery. Portugal, 1850–1913», Florencia, European University Institute, multicopiado.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. Z. (1987): «Does Japan Import Too Little: Closed Minds or Markets», Brookings Papers in Economic Activity, núm. 2, pp. 517–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (1974): «The Commodity Composition of International Trade in Manufactures: An Empirical Analysis», Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 26, pp. 350–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (1984): Sources of International Comparative Advantage, Cambridge, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (1988): «Measures of Openness», en Baldwin, R. E. (comps.), Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 147–204.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. E. y Bowen, H. P. (1981): «Cross-Section Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem: Comment», American Economic Review, vol. 71, pp. 1040–1043.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1953): «Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined», Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, pp. 332–349.Google Scholar
Levy-Leboyer, M., y Bourguignon, F. (1985): L'Economie Française au XIXe siècle, París, Economica.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H. (1938): Tariff Levels and The Economic Unity of Europe, Londres, George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Lindergren, A. M. (1945): «Literacy and Illiteracy in Various Countries of the World», Education for Victory, vol. 3, núm. 21.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1982): Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maizels, A. (1963): Industrial Growth and World Trade, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milward, A. S., y Saul, S. B. (1977): The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe 1850–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Agricultura (1911): Estadística Minera de La República 1909, Sección Geología, Mineralogía y Minería, vol. 3, núm. 3, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1980): European Historical Statistics 1750–1975, The MacMillan Press, 2a ed.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1983): International Historical Statistics: The Americas and Australasia, The MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinas, C., y Prados de la Escosura, L. (1989): «Was Spain Different? Spanish Historical Backwardness Revisited», Explorations in Economic History, núm. 26, pp. 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, M. G. (1899), Dictionary of Statistics, Londres, George Rotledge and Sons, Ltd., 4a ed.Google Scholar
OIT (Organización Internacional del Trabajo) (1949, 1955): Yearbook of Labor Statistics, Ginebra.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, K., y Williamson, J. G. (1992): «Were Heckscher and Ohlin Right? Putting History Back into the Factor-Price-Equalization Theorem», Discussion paper number 1593, Cambridge, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K., Taylor, A. M. y Williamsom, J. G. (1993): «Land, Labor and The Wage-Rental Ratio Factor Price Convergence in the Late Nineteenth Century», Discusson Paper Number 1629, Cambridge, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1981): Peaceful Conquest. The Industrialization of Europe 1760–1970, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, N., y Christy, F. T. Jr, (1962): Trends in Natural Resource Commodities, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, L. (1991): «Measuring Outward Orientation in Developing Countries», PER Working Paper no. 566, Banco Mundial.Google Scholar
Rothwell, R. P. (comp.): The Mineral Industry, Its Statistics, Technology and Trade, Nueva York, Scientific Publishing Company, varios números.Google Scholar
Rousch, G. A. (comp.): The Mineral Industry, Its Statistics, Technology and Trade, Nueva York, Scientific Publishing Company, varios números.Google Scholar
Saul, S. B. (1965): «The Export Economy, 1870–1914», Yorkshire Bulletin of Economic and Social Research, vol. XVII, núm. 1.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, G. R. (1983): «The Micro- and Macroeconomics of Foreign Sales to Japan», en Cline, W. R. (comp.), Trade Policy for the 1980s, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, G. R. (1986): «What's wrong with Japanese Trade Structure», Pacific Economic Papers, núm. 137, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Sociedad de Naciones (1927c): Memorandum on Balance of Payments and Foreign Trade 1911–1925. Volumen II. Trade Statistics, Ginebra.Google Scholar
Sothi, P. (1966): Trends of World Illiteracy since 1900 and its Relationships with some Selected Educational Social and Economic Factors, tesis doctoral, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Stedman, L. C., y Kaestle, C. F. (1987): «Literacy and Reading Performance in the United States. From 1880 to Present», Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 22, núm. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tena, A. (1992): «Protección y competitividad en España e Italia, 1890–1960», en Prados de la Escosura, L. y Zamagni, V. (eds.), El desarrollo económico en la Europa del Sur: España e Italia en perspectiva histórica, Madrid, Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar
Toniolo, G. (1977): «Effective Protection and Industrial Growth: The Case of Italian Engineering, 1898–1913», Journal of European Economic History, vol. 6, núm. 3, pp. 659–673.Google Scholar
Tortella, G. (1990): «Education and Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution: A Summary Report», en Van Der Wee, H. y Aerts, E. (comps.), Debates and Controversies in Economic History, Leuven, Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, C. (1981): The Industrialization of the Continental Powers 1780–1914, Nueva York, Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar
Tyszynski, H. (1951): «World Trade in Manufactured Commodities, 1899–1950», The Manchester School, vol. 19, pp. 272–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. (1980): «A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity», Econometrica, vol. 48, pp. 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (1992): «The Evolution of Global Markets in the First and Second World Since 1830: Background evidence and Hypotheses», Working Paper no. 36, Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER/DAE).Google Scholar
Wright, G. (1990): «The Origins of American Industrial Success, 1879–1940», American Economic Review, vol. 8, pp. 651–668.Google Scholar
Yates, P. Lamartine (1959): Forty Years of Foreign Trade, Londres, George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar