Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:13:39.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA (1858-1947)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2015

Tirthankar Roy*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science

Abstract

Interpretations of the role of the state in economic change in colonial (1858-1947) and post-colonial India (1947-) tend to presume that the colonial was an exploitative and the post-colonial a developmental state. This article shows that the opposition does not work well as a framework for economic history. The differences between the two states lay elsewhere than in the drive to exploit Indian resources by a foreign power. The difference was that British colonial policy was framed with reference to global market integration, whereas post-colonial policy was framed with reference to nationalism. The article applies this lesson to reread the economic effects of the two types of state, and reflects on ongoing debates in the global history of European expansion.

Resumen

Las interpretaciones del papel del estado en los cambios económicos de la India colonial (1858-1947) y poscolonial (1947-) tienden a suponer que la India colonial fue un estado explotador y la India postcolonial un estado desarrollista. Este artículo muestra que esta oposición no funciona bien dentro del marco de la historia económica. Las diferencias entre los dos estados se centran en factores distintos al deseo de una potencia extranjera por explotar los recursos de la India. La diferencia reside en que la política colonial británica se construyó en referencia a la integración en el mercado mundial, mientras que la política poscolonial se estructura en torno al nacionalismo. El texto aplica este enfoque a la relectura de los efectos económicos de los dos tipos de estado, y reflexiona sobre los debates en curso acerca de la historia global de la expansión europea.

Type
Panorama
Copyright
© Instituto Figuerola, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to thank two referees and the editors of the Revista for comments and suggestions that led to significant improvements on the version submitted. An earlier draft of the paper was presented in a workshop on Colonial Legacies: Persistence and Long-run Impact on Economic Growth, January 2015, held at the Fundación Ramón Areces, Madrid. The author is grateful to the participants and organisers of the workshop for a stimulating discussion and especially to Rafael Dobado González for his constructive comments and criticisms of the paper.

a

Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. [email protected]

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D.; Johnson, S., and Robinson, J.A. (2001): «The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation». American Economic Review 91 (5), pp. 1369-1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambirajan, S. (1978): Classical Political Economy and British Policy in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, A. K. (1972): «Some International Foundations of Capitalist Growth and Underdevelopment». Economic and Political Weekly 7 (31/33), pp. 1559-1570.Google Scholar
Bagchi, A. K. (1976): «Deindustrialization in India in the Nineteenth Century: Some Theoretical Implications». Journal of Development Studies 12 (3), pp. 135-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balachandran, G. (1996): John Bullion’s Empire: Britain’s Gold Problem and India Between the Wars. Richmond, VA: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Balachandran, G. (ed.) (2005): India and the World Economy, 1850-1950. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banerji, A. (1995): Aspects of Indo-British Economic Relations 1858-1898. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Barber, W. J. (1975): British Economic Thought and India, 1600-1858: A Study of Development Economics. New York, NY and Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berg, M. (1979): «Review of Classical Political Economy and British Policy in India by S. Ambirajan». Journal of Economic Literature 17 (2), pp. 536-538.Google Scholar
Blyn, G. (1966): Agricultural Trends in India, 1891-1947: Output, Availability, and Productivity. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, S. (ed.) (1994): Credit, Markets and the Agrarian Economy. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. (1990): Marxist Theories of Imperialism. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cain, P. J. (2012): «The Economics and Ethics of British Imperialism». The Historical Journal 55 (1), pp. 249-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, B. (1966): The Rise and Growth of Economic Nationalism in India. Delhi: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (1999): «The Economic Theory of the Developmental State», in M. Woo-Cummings (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 182-199.Google Scholar
Darwin, J. (2013): Unfinished Empire: The Global Expansion of Britain. London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Elson, R. E. (1994): Village Java Under the Cultivation System, 1830-1870. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Engerman, S., and Sokoloff, K. L. (2013): «Five Hundred Years of European Colonization: Inequality and Paths of Development», in C. Lloyd, J. Metzer, and R. Sutch (eds.), Settler Economies in World History. Leiden: Brill, pp. 23-53.Google Scholar
Habib, I. (1985): «Studying a Colonial Economy – Without Perceiving Colonialism». Modern Asian Studies 19 (3), pp. 355-381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, F. (2004): State and Locality in Mughal India: Power Relations in Western India, c. 1572-1730. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Headrick, D. (1981): The Tools of Empire. New York, NY and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heston, A. (1983): «National Income», in D. Kumar (ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2 (1757-1970). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 376-462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigoin, A., and Grafe, R. (2012): «A Stakeholder Empire: The Political Economy of Spanish Imperial Rule in America». Economic History Review 65 (2), pp. 609-651.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1999): «The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept», in M. Woo-Cummings (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 32-60.Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, Y. (1983): «Technical Adaptations and Managerial Resources in India: A Study of the Experience of the Cotton Textile Industry from a Comparative Viewpoint». Developing Economies 21 (2), pp. 97-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudaisiya, M. (2014): «The Promise of Partnership: Indian Business, the State, and the Bombay Plan of 1944». Business History Review 88 (1), pp. 97-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C.; Metzer, J., and Sutch, R. (2013): Settler Economies in World History. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lützelschwab, C. (2013): «Settler Colonialism in Africa», in C. Lloyd, J. Metzer, and R. Sutch (eds.), Settler Economies in World History. Leiden: Brill, pp. 141-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, C. (2002): Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–39. The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oak, M., and Swamy, A. V. (2012): «Myopia or Strategic Behavior? Indian Regimes and the East India Company in Late Eighteenth Century India». Explorations in Economic History 49 (3), pp. 352-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammell, J. (2014): The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, T. (1996): «The Role of the State in Initiating Development: A Study of Interwar South and Southeast Asia». Indian Economic and Social History Review 33 (4), pp. 373-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (1999): Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (2011): The Economic History of India 1857-1947. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (2012): India in the World Economy From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (2013): An Economic History of Early Modern India. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T., and Swamy, A. (2016): Law and the Economy in Colonial India. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Semmel, B. (1970): The Rise of Free Trade Imperialism: Classical Political Economy: The Empire of Free Trade and Imperialism, 1750-1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivasubramonian, S. (2000): National Income of India in the Twentieth Century. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sivasubramonian, S. (2004): The Sources of Economic Growth in India 1950-1 to 1999-2000. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, E. (1959): The English Utilitarians and India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunderland, D. (2013): Financing the Raj: The City of London and Colonial India, 1858-1940. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. R. (1979): The Political Economy of the Raj, 1914-1947. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, D. (1965): Classical Political Economy and Colonies. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A (2006): «The Transition to an Advanced Organic Economy». Economic History Review 59 (3), pp. 435-480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar