Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:01:58.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivation and its influence on outcome in rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Sally Guthrie  and
Andrew Harvey
Sally Guthrie
Affiliation:
Rheumatism and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds
Andrew Harvey*
Affiliation:
St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
*
Andrew Harvey, Consultant in Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rehabilitation
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 235 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1McLellan, DL. The UK experience of rehabilitation. In: The national concept of rehabilitation medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1991;: 13–20.Google Scholar
2Wade, DT.Stroke rehabilitation and long term care. Lancet 1992; 339: 791–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3World Health Organization. International classification of impairment disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980.Google Scholar
4Royal College of Physicians. Physical disability in 1986 and beyond. J Coll Physicians Lond 1986; 20: 3–37.Google Scholar
5Fogel, ML, Rosillo, RH.Correlation of psychological variables and progress in rehabilitation. II: motivation, arthritis and flexibility of goals. Dis Nerv Syst 1969; 30: 593–601.Google Scholar
6Hyman, MD.Social psychological determinants of patients' performance in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972; 53: 217–23.Google ScholarPubMed
7Thompson, SC, Sobolew-Shubin, A, Graham, MR, Janigian, AS.Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Soc Sci Med 1989; 28: 239–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8King, P, Barrowclough, C.Rating the motivation of elderly patients on a rehabilitation ward. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 289–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Petri, HL.Motivation: theory and research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1981.Google Scholar
10Locke, EA, Latham, GP.A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.Google Scholar
11Bandura, A.Self efficacy: toward a modifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Skevington, SM.Psychological aspects of pain in RA: a review. Soc Sci Med 1986; 23: 567–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Nicassio, PM, Radojevic, V, Weisman, MH, Culbertson, AL, Lewis, C, Clemmey, P.The role of helplessness in RA. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1114–20.Google Scholar
14Skevington, SM. Pain and locus of control – a social approach. In: Osborne, DJ, Gruneberg, MM, Eiser, JR eds. Research in psychology and medicine. London: Academic Press, 1979;: 61–69.Google Scholar
15Hirst, MA.National survey of young people with disabilities: locus of control and self esteem. Working paper no. 722. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 1990.Google Scholar
16Lazarus, KS.Coping theory and research. Psychosom Med 1993; 55: 234–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Markus, H, Nurius, P.Possible selves. Am Psychol 1986; 41: 954–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Linge, FR.Faith, hope and love: non-traditional therapy in recovery from serious head injury. Can J Psychol 1990; 44: 116–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Hohmann, GW.The insider-outsider position and the maintenance of hope. Rehabilitation 1975; 22: 136–41.Google Scholar
20Herbert, CM, Powell, GE.Insight and progress in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Latham, GP, Erez, M, Locke, EA.Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. J Appl Psychol 1988; 73: 753–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Anderson, E, Anderson, TP, Kottke, IJ.Stroke rehabilitation: maintenance of achieved gains. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977; 58: 345–49.Google ScholarPubMed
23Finkelstein, V. Disability: a social challenge or an administrative responsibility? In: Swain, J, Finkelstein, V, French, S, Oliver, M eds. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. London: Sage in association with the Open University, 1993.Google Scholar
24Williams, GH, Wood, PHN.Coming to terms with chronic illness; the negotiation of autonomy in RA. Int Dis Stud 1988; 10: 128–33.Google Scholar
25Berkman, LF, Syme, SL.Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a 9-year follow up study of Alameda county residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109: 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Blazer, DG.Social support and mortality in a elderly community population. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 684–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Dean, A, Lin, N.The stress-buffering role of social support: problems and prospects for systematic investigation. J Nerv Ment Dis 1977; 165: 402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Brisenden, S.Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disabil Handicap Soc 1986; 1: 173–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Bury, MR. Meanings at risk: the experience of arthritis. In: Anderson, R, Bury, M eds. Living with chronic illness: the experience of patients and their families. London: Unwin-Hymn, 1988;: 89–116.Google Scholar
30Deci, EL, Ryan, RM.Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Thompson, SC.Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychol Bull 1981; 90: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Wallston, KA, Wallston, BS, Smith, S, Dobbins, CJ.Perceived control and health. Curr Psychol Res Rev 1987; 6: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Rotter, JB.Social learning and clinical psychol. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Seligman, MEP.Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google ScholarPubMed
35Hegelson, VS.Moderators of the relation of perceived control and adjustment to chronic illness. J Pers Psychol Soc 1992; 63: 656–66.Google Scholar
36Lefcourt, HM.Locus of control: current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale NJ: Erhbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
37Shadish, WR, Hickman, D, Arrick, MC.Psychological problems of spinal cord injury patients: emotional distress as a function of time and locus of control. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981; 49: 297–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Bulman, RJ, Wortman, LB.Attribution of blame and coping in the real world: severe accident victims react to their lot. J Pers Soc Psychol 1977; 35: 351–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Partridge, CJ, Johnston, M.Perceived control and recovery from stroke. Br J Clin Psychol 1989; 28: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Eysenck, HJ.Expectations as causal elements in behavioural change. Adv Behav Res Ther 1978; 1: 171–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Lorig, K, Chastain, RL, Ung, E, Shoor, S, Holman, RH.Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Wallace, LM.Behavioural contracts. Nursing Times 1987; 83 (47): 33–34.Google ScholarPubMed
43O'Leary, A, Shoor, S, Lorig Holman, K.A cognitive behavioural set for RA. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Johnston, M, Gilbert, P, Partridge, C, Collins, J.Changing perceived control in patients with physical disability: an intervention study with patients, receiving rehabilitation. Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45British Psychological Society. Psychology and physical disability in the NHS. Report of the professional affairs board of the BPS. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 1989: 15.Google Scholar
46Brewin, CR. Attribution therapy. In: Watts, FN ed. New developments in clinical psychology, Volume 2. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 1988;: 20–34.Google Scholar
47Langer, EJ, Rodin, J.The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol 1976; 34: 191–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Corcoran, KJ.Efficacy skills reinforcement and choice behaviour. Am Psychol 1991; 45: 155–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Vallerand, RJ, O'Connor, B.Motivation in the elderly: a theoretical framework and some promising findings. Can J Psychol 1989; 30: 538–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Manne, SL, Zautra, AJ.Coping with arthritis-current status and critique. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 35: 1273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Brown, GK, Nicassio, PM.Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategy in chronic pain patients. Pain 1987; 31: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Newman, S.Coping with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1993; 52: 553–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Newman, SP, Revenson, TA.Coping with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheum 1993; 7: 259–80.Google ScholarPubMed
54Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S.Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.Google Scholar
55Lazarus, RS.Coping theory and research. Psychosom Med 1993; 55: 234–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Greenwald, AC, Pratkanis, AR. The self. In: Wyer, RS, Srull, TK eds. Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984;: 129–78.Google Scholar
57Jevne, R.Enhancing hope in the chronically ill. Humane Med 1993; 9: 121–30.Google Scholar
58Joseph Rowntree Foundation. The effectiveness of an independent living advocate. Social care research findings. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1993.Google Scholar