Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:24:02.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical and legal issues in the care of demented people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

RG Jones
RG Jones*
Affiliation:
University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
*
RG Jones, Senior Lecturer and Consultant Psychiatrist, Health Care of the Elderly, ‘B’ Floor, Medical School, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Psychiatry of old age
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 55 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Jonsen, AR.The end of medical ethics. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 393–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Grimley, Evans J. The sanctity of life. In: Elford, RJ ed. Medical ethics and elderly people. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.Google Scholar
3Oppenheimer, C. Ethics and the psychiatry of old age. In: Jacoby, R, Oppenheimer, C eds. Psychiatry in the elderly. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
4Jackson, J.Telling the truth. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 5–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Pitt, B.Exercising restraint [Editorial]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1988; 2: 207–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Gillett, G. Euthanasia, letting die and the pause. J Med Ethics 1989; 14: 2.Google Scholar
7Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF.Principles of biomedical ethics, third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
8Bloch, S, Chodoff, P.Psychiatric ethics, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
9Ekman, SL, Norberg, A.The autonomy of demented patients: interviews with caregivers. J Med Ethics 1988; 14: 184–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Jones, RG. Problems in senile dementia. In: Elford, RJ ed. Medical ethics and elderly people. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.Google Scholar
11Norman, AJ.Rights and risk. London: National Corporation for the Care of Old People, 1980.Google Scholar
12Age Concern. The law and vulnerable elderly people. London: Age Concern Publications, 1986.Google Scholar
13The Law Commission. Mentally incapacitated adults and decision-making: an overview. Consultation paper no. 119. London: HMSO, 1991.Google Scholar
14A working party report under the auspices of the Age Concern Institute of Gerontology and the Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College, London. The living will: consent to treatment at the end of life. London: Edward Arnold, 1988.Google Scholar
15Dyck, AJ.Ethical aspects of care of the dying incompetent. J Am Geriatr Soc 1984; 32: 661–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Veatch, RM.An ethical framework for terminal care decisions: a new classification of patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1984; 32: 665–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Annas, GJ.Nancy Cruzan and the right to die. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 670–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Elliott, C, Elliott, B.From the patient's point of view: medical ethics and the moral imagination. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 173–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Improving care of elderly people in hospital. Joint publication of the Royal College of Nursing, British Geriatrics Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1986.Google Scholar
20Rabkin, MT.Cost containment – ethical implications. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 413–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Wikler, D.Ethics and rationing: ‘whether’, ‘how’, or ‘how much?’ J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 398–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Schneider, LF, Pollock, VE, Lyness, SA.A meta-analysis of controlled trials of neuroleptic treatment in dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 553–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Levin, E. Carers – problems, strains, and services. In: Jacoby, R, Oppenheimer, C eds. Psychiatry in the elderly. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
24Mace, NL, Rabins, PV.The 36-hour day. London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1986.Google Scholar
25Daniels, N.Am I my parents' keeper? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
26Williams, A.Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical? J Med Ethics 1992; 18: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Dickson, J, Welsh, HG.Priority setting; lessons from Oregon. Lancet 1991; 337: 891–94.Google Scholar
28Tooley, N.Abortion and infantacide. Phil Public Aff 1972; 2: 37–65.Google Scholar
29Brock, DW.Justice and the severely demented elderly. J Med Philos 1988; 13: 73–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Rosser, RM, Watts, VC.The measurement of hospital output. Int J Epidemiol 1972; 1: 361–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Williams, A.Quality-adjusted life-years. Lancet 1987; ii: 1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Black, D.Paying for health. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 117–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Harris, J.Unprincipled QUALYs: a response to Cubbon. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 185–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Stanley, JM.The Apppleton Consensus: suggested international guidelines for decisions to forego medical treatment. J Med Ethics 1989; 15: 129–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party. Withdrawal of life-support from patients in a persistent vegetative state. Lancet 1991; 337: 96–98.Google Scholar
36Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party. Assisted death. Lancet 1990; 336: 610–13.Google Scholar
37Royal College of Psychiatrists. Joint Working Group on the Consent of Non-volitional Patients and de facto Detention of Informal Patients. Council report CR6. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1989.Google Scholar
38van der Maas, PJ, van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Looman, CWN.Clinical practice: euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet 1991; 338: 669–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Millard, P. Kill or care: euthanasia and the doctor in the UK. Geriatr Med 1992; 22: 16.Google Scholar
40Black, D. Guidelines or gumption? The role of medical responsibility: a view from the profession. In: Hirsch, S, Harris, J eds. Consent and the incompetent patient–ethics, law and medicine. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1986: 29–31.Google Scholar
41Wear, AN, Brahams, D.At the coalface: to treat or not to treat: the legal, ethical and therapeutic implications of treatment refusal. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 131–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Briscoe, M, Harris, B.Compulsory detention in hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1141–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43DOH. Mental Health Act 1983, code of practice. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
44Brahams, D.Involuntary hospital admission under Section 47 of the National Assistance Act. Lancet 1987; ii: 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Brahams, D.Sterilisation of a mentally incapable woman. Lancet 1989; i: 1275–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Applebaum, PS, Grisso, T.Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1635–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Roth, LH, Meisel, A, Lidz, CW.Tests of competency to consent to treatment. Am J Psychiatry 1977; 134: 279–84.Google ScholarPubMed
48USA President's Commission for the study of ethical problems in medicine and biomedical and behavioural research, making health care decisions: a report on the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient/practitioner relationship. 1982; 1: 172.Google Scholar
49Tepper, AM, Elwork, A.Competence to consent to treatment as a psycholegal constraint. Law Hum Behav 1884; 8: 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Law Society's Mental Health Sub-Committee. Decision making and mental incapacity. A discussion document. London: The Law Society's Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
51Law Reform Commission of Victoria. Enduring powers of attorney, discussion paper 18. Melbourne: Law Reform Commission of Victoria, 1990.Google Scholar
52Law Reform Commission of British Columbia. Report on the enduring power of attorney: fine tuning the concept. Vancouver: Law Reform Commission of British Columbia, 1990.Google Scholar
53Australian Law Reform Commission. Enduring powers of attorney, third report, no. 47. Canberra: Australian Law Reform Commission, 1988.Google Scholar
54Kosberg, JI.Abuse and maltreatment of the elderly: causes and interventions. Bristol: Wright, 1983.Google Scholar
55Quinn, MJ, Tomita, SK.Elder abuse and neglect: causes, diagnosis and intervention strategies. New York: Springer, 1986.Google Scholar
56Bennett, GJ, Ebrahim, S eds. Legal aspects. In: The essentials of health care of the elderly. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.Google Scholar
57Greaves, DA.Can compulsory removal ever be justified for adults who are mentally competent? J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Muir Gray, JA.Section 47– assault on or protection of the freedom of the individual? A short response to Greaves. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Carson, D. Being prepared. In: Carson, D ed. Making the most of the Court of Protection: a guide to the law relating to the Court of Protection and of making use of the court's services. London: King's Fund Centre, 1987.Google Scholar
60Public Trust Office. Handbook for receivers. London: Public Trust Office, 1988.Google Scholar
61Public Trust Office. Enduring powers of attorney. London: Public Trust Office, 1989.Google Scholar
62Department of Social Security. The Social Security (Claims and Payments) Regulations 1987, reg. 33 SI 1987/1968.Google Scholar
63Jacoby, R. Appointeeship. In: Jacoby, R, Oppenheimer, C eds. Psychiatry in the elderly. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar