Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:41:58.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment and treatment of disorders of visual perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Nadina B Lincoln
Nadina B Lincoln*
Affiliation:
Stroke Research Unit, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
*
Nadina B Lincoln, Stroke Research Unit, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rehabilitation
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 77 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Benton, AL. Visuoperceptive, visuospatial and visuoconstructive disorders. In: Heilman, KM, Valenstein, E eds. Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979: 151–85.Google Scholar
2 Robertson, IH. The relationship between lateralised and non-lateralised attentional deficits in unilateral neglect. In: Robertson, IH, Marshall, JC eds. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993: 257–75.Google Scholar
3 Andrews, K, Brocklehurst, JC, Richards, B, Laycock, PJ. The prognostic value of picture drawings by stroke patients. Rheumatol Rehabil 1980; 19: 180–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Delis, DC, Robertson, LC, Balliet, R. The breakdown and rehabilitation of visuospatial dysfunction in brain injured patients. Int Rehabil Med 1983; 5: 132–38.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Kinsella, G, Ford, B. Hemi-inattention and the recovery patterns of stroke patients. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 102–106.Google ScholarPubMed
7 Denes, G, Semenza, C, Stoppa, E, Lis, A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 1982; 105: 543–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Bernspang, B, Asplund, K, Eriksson, S, Fugl-Meyer, AR. Motor and perceptual impairments in acute stroke patients: effects on self care ability. Stroke 1987; 18: 1081–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Kotila, M, Niemi, ML, Laaksonen, R. Four-year prognosis of stroke patients with visuospatial inattention. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986; 18: 177–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Stone, SP, Pater, P, Greenwood, RS. Selection of acute stroke patients for treatment of visual neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56: 463–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Levine, DN, Warach, JD, Benowitz, L, Calvanio, R. Left spatial neglect: effects of lesion size and premorbid brain atrophy on severity and recovery following right cerebral infarction. Neurology 1986; 36: 362–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB, Towle, D. The recovery of perceptual problems after stroke and the impact on daily life. Clin Rehabil 1991; 4: 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Sunderland, A, Wade, DT, Langton-Hewer, R. The natural history of visual neglect after stroke: indications from two assessment methods. Int Disabil Stud 1987; 9: 55–61;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Shulman, KI, Shedletsky, R, Silver, IL. The challenge of time: clock drawing and cognitive function in the elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1986; 1: 135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Pan, GD, Stern, Y, Sano, M, Mayeux, R. Clock-drawing in neurological disorders. Behav Neurol 1989; 2: 39–48.Google Scholar
16 Barer, DH, Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. Screening for perceptual problems in acute stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Stone, SP, Greenwood, R. Assessing neglect in stroke patients. Lancet 1991; 337: 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Whiting, SE, Lincoln, NB, Bhavnani, G, Cockburn, J. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1985.Google Scholar
19 Crammond, HJ, Clark, MS, Smith, DS. The effect of using the dominant or nondominant hand on performance of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Lincoln, NB, Edmans, JA. A shortened version of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery? Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Riddoch, MJ, Humphrey, GW. Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.Google Scholar
22 Warrington, EK. Visual object and space perception battery. Fareham, Hants: Thames Valley Test Co., 1991.Google Scholar
23 Wilson, B, Cockburn, J, Halligan, P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Fareham, Hants, Thames Valley Test Co, 1988.Google Scholar
24 Wilson, BA, Cockburn, J, Halligan, P. Development of a behavioural test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 98–102.Google Scholar
25 Halligan, PW, Marshall, JC, Wade, DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 1989; 11: 908–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Towle, D, Lincoln, NB. Development of a questionnaire for detecting everyday problems in stroke patients with unilateral visual neglect. Clin Rehabil 1991; 5: 135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Stone, SP, Patel, P, Greenwood, RJ, Halligan, PW. Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect recovery index. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55: 431–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Lincoln, NB, Whiting, SE, Cockburn, J, Bhavnani, G. An evaluation of perceptual retraining. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 99–110.Google ScholarPubMed
29 Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. Treatment of visual perceptual deficits after stroke: four single case studies. Int Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Towle, D, Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. An evaluation of a group treatment programme for stroke patients with perceptual deficits. Int J Rehabil Res 1990; 13: 328–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Diller, L, Weinberg, J. Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: evolution of a rational remediation program. In: Weinstein, GA, Friedland, RP eds. Advances in neurology, volume 18. New York: Raven Press, 1977.Google Scholar
32 Gordon, WA, Hibbard, MR, Egelko, S et al. Perceptual remediation in patients with right brain damage: a comprehensive program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 353–59.Google ScholarPubMed
33 Weinberg, J, Diller, L, Gordon, W et al. Training sensory awareness and spatial organisation in people with right brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 491–96.Google ScholarPubMed
34 Weinberg, J, Piasetsky, E, Diller, L, Gordon, W. Treating perceptual organization deficits in nonneglecting RED stroke patients. J Clin Neuropsychol 1982; 4: 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Soderback, I, Norwell, LA. Intellectual function training in adults with acquired brain damage: evolution. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986; 18: 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Young, GC, Collins, D, Hren, M. Effect of pairing scanning training with block design training in the remediation of perceptual problems in left hemiplegics. J Clin Neuropsychol 1983; 5: 210–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Webster, JS, Jones, S, Blanton, P. Visual scanning training with stroke patients. Behav Ther 1984; 15: 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Gouvier, WD, Cottam, G, Webster, JS, Beissel, GF, Wofford, JD. Behavioural interventions with stroke patients for improving wheelchair navigation. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1984; 6: 186–90.Google Scholar
39 Wagenaar, RC, van Wieringen, PCW, Netelenbos, JB, Meijer, OG, Knik, DJ. The transfer of scanning training effects in visual inattention after stroke: five single case studies. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Ashburn, A, Lynch, M. Disadvantages of the early use of wheelchairs in the treatment of hemiplegia. Clin Rehabil 1988; 2: 327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Robertson, I, Gray, J, McKenzie, S. Microcomputer based cognitive rehabilitation of visual neglect: three multiple baseline single case studies. Brain Inj 1988; 2: 151–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Robertson, IH, Gray, JM, Pentland, B, Waite, LJ. A randomised controlled trial of microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 663–68.Google ScholarPubMed
43 Robertson, IH, North, NT, Geggie, C. Spatiomotor cueing in left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55: 799–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Halligan, PW, Donegan, CA, Marshall, JC. When is a cue not a cue? On the intractability of visuospatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1992; 2: 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 Prada, G, Tallis, R. Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator. Clin Rehabil (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
46 Ladavas, E, Menghini, G, Umilta, C. A rehabilitation study of hemispatial neglect. Cogn Neuropsychol 1994; 11: 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Walker, MF, Drummond, AE, Lincoln, NB. Dressing after stroke. Age Aging (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
48 Loverro, J, Reding, M. Bed orientation and rehabilitation outcome for patients with stroke and hemianopsia or visual neglect. J Neuro Rehabil 1983; 2: 147–50.Google Scholar
49 Rossi, PW, Kheyfets, S, Reding, MJ. Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 1990; 40: 1597–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed