Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:25:30.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON TRUTH HIERARCHIES: A CORRECTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2019

PHILIP D. WELCH
PHILIP D. WELCH*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol
*
*SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL BRISTOL BS8 1TW, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A correction is needed to our paper: to the definition contained within the statement of Lemma 1.5 and thus arguments around it in §3.

Keywords

03B8003B6003D5503D80truth theoryhierarchiesrevision theory
Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 857 - 860
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Field, H. (2003). A revenge-immune solution to the semantic paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32 (3), 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, H. (2008). Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scambler, C. (2019). Ineffability and revenge. Review of Symbolic Logic, doi:10.1017/S1755020318000473.Google Scholar
Welch, P. D. (2008). Ultimate truth vis à vis stable truth. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(1), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, P. D. (2014). Some observations on truth hierarchies. Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar